Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Ankit Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi & Another
The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted to accused Gopal Goyal Kanda in a suicide case, emphasizing that cancellation of bail requires cogent proof of misuse, and restrained prejudicial media reporting to ensure fair trial.
GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS v. ROHTAS SINGH
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing reinstatement of a police officer acquitted on appeal and treating his dismissal period as spent on duty, ensuring parity with similarly situated co-accused.
Sunil Aggarwal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an onerous condition in an anticipatory bail order prohibiting the petitioner from contacting the complainant, holding that courts must impose only relevant and just conditions under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
S.S. Sandhu v. State
The Delhi High Court restored the Magistrate's order directing FIR registration under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., affirming the Magistrate's judicial discretion to order police investigation upon a complaint disclosing a cognizable offence.
Artsy Infrastructure & Projects Pvt Ltd & Ors v. Vatsal Infraprojects Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, clarifying RBI no-objection requirements and affirming directors' liability for RBI violations.
ANK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PVT LTD v. The Sixth Element Sports & Entertainments Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, holding that a separate petition for capital reduction under sections 100 to 104 is not required when substantial compliance is demonstrated.
Rohtash Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a BSF constable found guilty of manhandling colleagues and unauthorized possession of ammunition, ruling that procedural lapses did not vitiate the conviction supported by strong ocular evidence.
Union of India v. Shambhaji Rao
The Delhi High Court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal's award granting Rs. 80,000 compensation per fracture under the Railway Accident Compensation Rules, dismissing the Railway's appeal.
M/S NEW ERA INDUSTRIES v. M/S STAR ALUBUILD PVT LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that an unconditional bank guarantee cannot be restrained from encashment except in cases of egregious fraud or special equity, and dismissed the plaintiff's injunction application against encashment of the bank guarantee.
Perry Kansagra v. Smriti Madan Kansagra
The court upheld the custodial mother’s discretion to choose the minor child’s school, dismissing the father’s appeal to transfer the child’s admission to a different school.
Drive Fast Holdings Pvt Ltd v. Suridhi Retail Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 and allowed exemption from a separate petition for reduction of capital integral to the scheme.
Ankit Infowed Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Regional Director, Northern Region
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, clarifying that RBI no-objection is not mandatory prior to court approval and that directors remain liable for RBI violations despite the sanction.
M/S MBL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding the Government liable for service tax payment and directed the Service Tax Department to refund amounts not payable to the decree-holder.
Aschraj Lal Sahni & Others v. Mukesh Sahni
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to resolve partnership disputes under arbitration clauses, upheld enforcement of interim orders despite obstruction, and held immovable property disputes require consent for arbitration reference.
Avantha Realty Limited v. Biltech Building Elements Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a first motion application under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with shareholder meetings due to consent and directing creditor meetings under court supervision for a Scheme of Amalgamation.
Airwaves Telefilms Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Dolf Leasing Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for amalgamation of multiple companies after finding all procedural compliances fulfilled and no objections raised.
Gobind Ram Arora & Ors v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if no possession or compensation occurs within five years before the 2013 Act, even for subsequent purchasers.
Shilpi Jain and Ors. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court quashed a sealing and demolition order passed without notice or hearing to the affected shop owners, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of natural justice.
Rajiv Chhikara v. Sandhya Mathur
The Delhi High Court upheld divorce on grounds of mental cruelty, holding that unilateral withdrawal of mutual consent after settlement and an apology letter admitting cruelty justified dissolution of marriage.
Pranesh Gupta & Anr. v. Jagdish Bansilal Khurana
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of Rs. 9.93 crores with interest against a defendant who defaulted on multiple loans and dishonoured a repayment cheque.