Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

T. Murlidhar v. P.V.R. Murthy

01 Jul 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:3005

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance of an oral agreement to sell, holding that the plaint failed to disclose a clear cause of action due to absence of essential contract terms and contradictory evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance oral agreement to sell cause of action Order 7 Rule 11 CPC

Satish Kumar Chojar v. Subhashni Chopra & Ors.

01 Jul 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:2996

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a registered Will but held that absolute ownership vested in the testator's wife, resulting in equal partition among heirs after her intestate death, dismissing the defendants' family settlement claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will Partition Leasehold property Indian Succession Act

Surjit Singh Bhatia & Others v. Tej Raj Singh Goel (HUF)

01 Jul 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:2989

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance due to Plaintiffs' failure to prove continuous readiness and willingness, upheld forfeiture of earnest money paid at contract execution, and directed refund of subsequent payments with interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness earnest money Hindu Undivided Family

M/S CROMPTON GREAVES LTD. v. M/S KUSHA APPLIANCES & ANOTHER

01 Jul 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:2991

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Crompton Greaves Ltd. against defendants for unauthorized use of its registered trademark and copyrighted logo on inferior quality cooler kits, affirming exclusive rights under the Trademark Act, 1999.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Copyright infringement Passing off Permanent injunction

Radnik Exports v. Standard Chartered Bank

01 Jul 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:2990

The Delhi High Court held that once recovery proceedings are initiated before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, the Civil Court's jurisdiction to entertain suits challenging the same claim or seeking injunctions is barred under the DRT Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Debt Recovery Tribunal Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 Section 18 DRT Act Section 30 Indian Contract Act

Maj.Genl.S.B.Akali v. UOI & Ors.

01 Jul 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:2992-DB

The Delhi High Court held the permanent secondment and promotion of an Army Dental Corps officer to DRDO illegal, ordered retrospective promotion of the petitioner, and directed creation of supernumerary posts to remedy wrongful denial of promotion.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Defence Research and Development Organization Permanent secondment Army Dental Corps Army Medical Corps

GOYAL MG GASES PRIVATE LTD. v. MESSER GRIESHEIM GMBH

01 Jul 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:2993-DB

The Delhi High Court is not a 'District Court' under Section 44A CPC and thus lacks jurisdiction to execute foreign decrees, which must be executed by the appropriate District Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 44A Code of Civil Procedure execution of foreign decree District Court High Court jurisdiction

THIESS MINECS INDIA PVT LTD v. NTPC LTD

01 Jul 2014 · VIPIN SANGHI · 2014:DHC:2994

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition restraining termination of a mining development contract, holding that the respondent validly terminated under contractual provisions after due notice and good faith discussions.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Project Agreement Development Stage Termination Notice Clause 8.3(b)

SILOR ASSOCIATES SA v. BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICAL LTD

01 Jul 2014 · VIPIN SANGHI · 2014:DHC:2995
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has the power to direct production of documents without court assistance, and court intervention under Section 27 is only warranted upon non-compliance.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral tribunal Production of documents Section 27 Arbitration Act Section 19 Arbitration Act

Raj Pal v. State

01 Jul 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:3013
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted a Patwari accused of bribery under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to failure of prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt amid contradictory evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 bribery demand and acceptance of bribe foundational facts

CIT v. Narinder Kr. Budhiraja

01 Jul 2014 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; VIBHU BAKHRU · 2014:DHC:3019-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal holding that an addition under Section 69B cannot be deleted solely on the basis of a retracted statement when corroborated by an independent valuation report.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 69B Income Tax Act unexplained investment valuation officer report voluntary statement

CIT v. Narinder Kr. Budhiraja

01 Jul 2014 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; VIBHU BAKHRU · 2014:DHC:3018-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal holding that addition of unexplained investment under Section 69B can be sustained based on valuation corroborating the assessee's statement, and remitted the penalty matter for fresh consideration.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 69B Income Tax Act unexplained investment retracted statement valuation report

Harvinder Singh Chadha v. Saran Kaur Chadha & Ors.

01 Jul 2014 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:3004-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the appellant had no legal share in the disputed property as ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act, and an unregistered family agreement purporting to gift immovable property was invalid, dismissing the property suits as not maintainable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 ancestral property self-acquired property gift of immovable property

M/S Mukti Credits Pvt. Ltd. v. Indraprastha Power Generation Co. Ltd.

30 Jun 2014 · Jyoti Singh · 2020 SCC OnLine Del 113

The Delhi High Court restrained the respondent from encashing the bank guarantee pending final adjudication of arbitral award objections, directing its return to the petitioner as the net amount payable was in the petitioner’s favor.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 petition bank guarantee security deposit

Kavita Kanwar v. State (N.C.T. Delhi) & Ors

27 Jun 2014 · Veena Birbal · 2014:DHC:2988

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the probate denial of a Will due to unexplained suspicious circumstances and lack of proof that the testatrix understood and voluntarily executed the Will.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 validity of Will execution of Will

Newton Engineering and Chemicals Limited v. UEM India Private Limited

19 Jun 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2023:DHC:1644

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the existence of an arbitration agreement prima facie requires arbitration, leaving jurisdictional disputes for the arbitrator to decide.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition arbitration agreement Memorandum of Understanding

Microsoft Corporation & Anr v. Manjeet Singh & Ors

18 Jun 2014 · Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:2987-DB

The Delhi High Court recorded a lawful and reasonable settlement in a copyright infringement suit by Microsoft against defendants using unlicensed software and passed a decree accordingly, disposing of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed copyright infringement settlement agreement Order 23 Rule 3 CPC Section 151 CPC

U.O.I v. B.S. Chhabra

13 Jun 2014 · Gita Mittal; Deepa Sharma · 2014:DHC:2986-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a government servant terminated for unauthorized absence without completing 20 years' qualifying service is not entitled to pension under CCS (Pension) Rules and set aside the Tribunal's order directing pension payment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant CCS Pension Rules pension entitlement pro rata pension unauthorized absence

Bacha Ram v. Union of India

13 Jun 2014 · Gita Mittal; Deepa Sharma · 2014:DHC:2985-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s quashing of disciplinary proceedings for lack of jurisdiction and ruled that the petitioner is entitled to interest on delayed retiral benefits from the date of retirement, with interest on commuted pension payable only from medical fitness certification.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings jurisdiction retiral benefits interest on delayed payment

Suresh Shah v. M/S Tata Consultancy Services Ltd

13 Jun 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:2984

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the arbitrator's refusal to grant interim relief securing disputed rent and stamp duty liabilities, holding that existing securities and pending arbitration suffice pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim relief Section 17 interim measures Stamp duty liability