Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Shri Goverdhan Singh v. M/S Alisha Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act cannot decide disputed factual issues like unauthorized amalgamation of leased premises, and allowed the tenant to continue renovations pending arbitration.
Shri Goverdhan Singh v. M/S Alisha Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld interim reliefs allowing a tenant to continue renovations and use of leased premises despite landlord's objections, holding that disputed factual issues must be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal under the Arbitration Act.
Dharmender Sharma & Anr. v. Sriram Transport Finance Co Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting interest at 18% per annum, rejecting appellants' plea to reduce it to 10%, emphasizing that contractual interest rates agreed by parties prevail unless legally invalid.
Narain Singh v. The State
The Delhi High Court set aside letters of administration granted on a Will not validly executed and attested under Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, emphasizing the mandatory nature of attestation and the need for affirmative evidence of execution.
Vijay Sethi & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside probate granted on a Will bearing only thumb impression without signature, emphasizing the need to prove testamentary capacity and satisfactorily explain suspicious circumstances including delay in filing.
Kohli One Housing & Development Pvt. Ltd. v. C.S. Aggarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected the plaint against certain defendants for lack of cause of action and mala fide amendment attempts, holding that lifting the corporate veil requires proper pleadings and that collusion to obtain interim relief amounts to abuse of process.
Maya John and Anr. v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the university's amendment to the Teaching Assistant Scheme requiring UGC NET clearance within two years and dismissed the appellant's challenge to termination and HRA deduction.
Union of India v. M/S. J.D. Construction and Anr.
The court held that forfeiture of security deposit as liquidated damages cannot be claimed in addition to damages awarded for the same incomplete and defective work under the Contract Act, dismissing the Union of India's appeal against the arbitral award.
Prem Singh v. Dharm Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that the tenant failed to make out a prima facie case for leave to defend under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Shri Jitendra Prasad Agarwal v. Associated Tubewell (India) Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed an administrator to manage Associated Tubewell (India) Ltd due to mismanagement and misuse of company funds and assets by majority shareholders, restraining the managing director from drawing benefits pending investigation.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Global Associates
The Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal reinstating penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars where the assessee's explanation was not bona fide.
P L Singla v. UOI and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed payment of pension and arrears to a retired judicial officer as per the Shetty Commission recommendations accepted by the Supreme Court, without requiring exemption under Rule 49(2)(b) of the CCS Pension Rules.
Allahrakha & Anr. v. Allahwala & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, ruling that tenants cannot challenge landlord's title while in occupation and paying rent, and bona fide need for residential use justifies eviction.
Allahrakha & Anr. v. Allahwala & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, ruling that tenants cannot challenge landlord's title during tenancy and bona fide need justifies eviction.
Saraswti Devi v. Santosh Kumari
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on the ground of landlord's bonafide need under the Delhi Rent Control Act, emphasizing that tenants must raise all defenses upfront and that changed circumstances justify eviction.
Dinesh Kumar Gupta v. Sh. Sunil Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bonafide need, holding that the tenant paying rent is estopped from disputing ownership and no triable issue was raised to defend eviction.
M/S. SAMRAT INDUSTRIES v. UOI AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition challenging penalty and debarment for importing rapeseeds without prior approval under the Import-Export Policy, holding that the contested orders cannot stand in view of the pending CEGAT order interpreting the policy.
Shahid Ali v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging UPSC's exclusion of Arabic and Persian from Civil Services optional subjects, holding the petitioner lacked locus standi and UPSC's decision was lawful and discretionary.
Akhil Bhartiya Railway Mal Godam Mazdoor Kalyan Sanstha v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Railway Mal Godam workers engaged as contract labour by consignors/consignees are not entitled to absorption into Railway or FCI employment, but basic amenities mandated by Railway Board must be provided.
Naresh Kumar Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that enhancement of disciplinary punishment after the original penalty period expired is impermissible and quashed the order removing the petitioner from service.