Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Sudershan Kumar v. Harish Chand Garg
The Delhi High Court held that tenants raising prima facie triable issues on the landlord's bonafide requirement and alternative accommodation are entitled to leave to defend eviction petitions under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Sudershan Kumar v. Harish Chand Garg
The Delhi High Court held that eviction petitions on bonafide requirement grounds must be tested for triable issues at the leave to defend stage, granting leave where genuine disputes exist and emphasizing objective assessment of alternative accommodation.
Union of India v. M/S Track Innovations (India) Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award applying lower tender rates from the date of acceptance and limited interest to post-award period, emphasizing restricted judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Sterlite Optical Technologies Ltd v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that disputes over the mode of computation of copper prices under a broad arbitration clause are arbitrable and set aside the arbitrator's order terminating proceedings without deciding arbitrability.
Amina Bharatram v. Sumant Bharatram & Ors.
The Delhi High Court referred to a larger Bench the question of whether its original civil jurisdiction is ousted by the Family Courts Act, 1984, in matrimonial and maintenance suits, given conflicting judicial precedents.
M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. M/S AFCONS-APIL (JV)
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award applying uniform price escalation indices at the final bill stage, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. M/S R.N SHETTY & COMPANY
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting additional costs and interest to a contractor due to employer's delay in handing over site, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Neha Gupta v. State of Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court dismissed bail cancellation petition and modified charge from Section 308 IPC to Section 323 IPC based on medical evidence of superficial injury.
Ritika Prasad v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
The Delhi High Court directed the university to issue educational degrees reflecting both parents' names, affirming gender equality and compliance with the UGC circular mandating inclusion of mothers' names on academic certificates.
ISCO TRACK SLEEPERS PVT LTD v. DELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court restrained encashment of performance bank guarantees invoked without contractual compliance, holding that judicial intervention against unconditional bank guarantees is exceptional and justified only in cases of fraud or irretrievable harm pending arbitration.
ISCO TRACK SLEEPERS PVT LTD v. DELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court restrained encashment of performance bank guarantees invoked without contractual compliance, holding judicial interference in invocation is limited to cases of fraud or irretrievable harm, pending arbitration.
Yogesh Jain & Ors. v. Rakesh Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award begins only upon proper delivery of a signed copy of the award as mandated by law, and sending it by speed post without registered AD or personal delivery does not constitute valid service.
Yogesh Jain & Ors. v. Rakesh Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 starts only upon delivery of a duly signed copy of the award, and mere dispatch by speed post without registered AD or personal delivery does not suffice, allowing the petitions to proceed on merits.
Maruti Insurance Distribution Services Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer cannot disallow genuine commission payments to dealers based on arbitrary percentage limits, affirming the exclusive commercial discretion of the enterprise under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.
AEZ Infratech Pvt Ltd v SNG Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration agreement is admitted and relied upon in the suit, the court must refer the matter to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act despite non-filing of the original or certified copy, and that an exclusive jurisdiction clause does not negate a mandatory arbitration clause.
Saroj v. Kusum Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal against concurrent findings that the appellant failed to prove title over the property, holding the suit barred under the Benami Transactions Act and no substantial question of law arising under Section 100 CPC.
Ravi Kumar & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of four accused for the murder of Kuldeep, affirming that credible testimony of close relatives corroborated by medical and circumstantial evidence suffices to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Prabhu Dayal Sharma v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Sections 325/34 IPC based on reliable injured witness testimony, rejected alibi pleas, affirmed acquittal in cross-case, and modified sentence by granting probation to the aged appellant.
Kanchan Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for grievous injuries based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, rejected the alibi plea for lack of proof, but reduced the sentence and ordered compensation to victims.
Nutan Kumar v. Rajesh Arora
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging the probate of a registered will, holding that the evidence was properly appreciated and no error apparent on record justified review.