Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Ram Manglani v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted probate and Letters of Administration in favor of the petitioner after validating the duly executed Will and recording a compromise with the challenger.
Orchid Deepak Diwan v. Raghu Printer Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Orchid Printers and Syndicate Printers under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after addressing regulatory concerns and undertakings on tax liabilities.
AEZ Infratech Pvt Ltd v. SNG Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration agreement is admitted and relied upon in the suit, the court must refer the dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act despite non-filing of the original or certified copy, and that a mandatory arbitration clause prevails over an exclusive jurisdiction clause conferring jurisdiction on courts.
AEZ Infratech Pvt Ltd v SNG Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration clause is admitted and forms the basis of the suit, non-filing of the original or certified copy is not fatal, and the dispute must be referred to arbitration despite an exclusive jurisdiction clause.
AEZ Infratech Pvt Ltd v SNG Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration agreement is admitted and forms the basis of the suit, the court must refer the dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act despite non-filing of the original or certified copy, and that an exclusive jurisdiction clause does not render the arbitration clause optional.
AEZ Infratech Pvt Ltd v SNG Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration clause is admitted and forms the basis of the suit, non-filing of the original or certified copy under Section 8(2) is not fatal and directed reference of the dispute to arbitration despite an exclusive jurisdiction clause.
AEZ Infratech Pvt Ltd v SNG Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration agreement is admitted and forms the basis of the suit, non-filing of the original or certified copy is not fatal and directed reference of the dispute to arbitration despite an exclusive jurisdiction clause.
AEZ Infratech Pvt Ltd v SNG Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration clause is admitted and forms the basis of the suit, the court must refer disputes to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act despite non-filing of the original or certified arbitration agreement and notwithstanding an exclusive jurisdiction clause.
3M Innovative Properties Company & Anr v. M/S Venus Safety & Health Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in a patent infringement suit, holding that a granted patent lacks presumption of validity and that defendants must raise a credible challenge to vacate injunction.
Siri Ram Syal & Sons (Engineers) Pvt. Ltd. v. Ircon International Ltd.
The court held that once an arbitral award becomes a decree, it must be executed as per its terms, rejecting claims based on prior agreements and allowing interest only for delayed payments as per the decree.
AEZ Infratech Pvt Ltd v SNG Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration agreement is admitted and relied upon in the suit, the court must refer the dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act despite non-filing of the original or certified copy of the agreement.
AEZ Infratech Pvt Ltd v SNG Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration clause is admitted and forms the basis of the suit, strict compliance with filing requirements under Section 8(2) is not mandatory and referred the dispute to arbitration despite a conflicting jurisdiction clause.
Joginder Singh Malik v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a police sub-inspector for demanding and accepting bribe, affirming that conscious demand and acceptance proved by witness testimony and phenolphthalein test attract the presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Procter & Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. Anchor Health & Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining use of marks "ALL-AROUND PROTECTION" and "ALL-ROUNDER" as infringing the registered trademark "ALLROUND", recognizing slogans as protectable trademarks when distinctive.
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD & ORS v. NATCO PHARMA LIMITED
Delhi High Court has territorial jurisdiction over a patent infringement suit concerning apprehended marketing within Delhi, and a defendant's statement of non-intention to market does not oust such jurisdiction.
India Tourism Development Corporation Limited v. Susan Leigh Beer
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's finding of negligence against ITDC for a swimming pool injury under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, dismissing the appeal and affirming damages awarded to the plaintiff.
Nisha Gupta v. Ram Kishan Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that when signatures on cheques are admitted in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, forensic examination to determine the age of ink is unnecessary and dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to order such examination.
Dr. Vijay Institute of Education and Technology v. All India Council for Technical Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking a second AICTE inspection for approval of a technical institute, holding that the appellant's failure to comply and obstructing inspection disentitled it from equitable relief.
Ramesh Kirar v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the criminal appeal of Ramesh Kirar by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case.
Parivar Seva Sanstha v. Marie Stopes International
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant’s belated attempt to file additional documents in an eleven-year-old suit, holding that procedural discipline and appealability rules under the CPC must be respected to prevent trial delays.