Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
SMS Limited v. Oil & Natural Gas Limited
The Delhi High Court held that unconditional bank guarantees are invocable on demand and refused to grant pre-arbitral injunction restraining ONGC from invoking bank guarantees furnished by SMS for liquidated damages.
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Lovely Bal Shiksha Parishad
The Delhi High Court held that a private school governed by State Education Acts is under State control and exempt from the EPF Act under Section 16(1)(b), dismissing the appeal of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.
State Farms Corporation of India Ltd v. P.S. Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that enhanced gratuity benefits granted by a presidential directive and office memorandum are binding on the employer if affordable, even for employees retired before statutory amendment, directing the petitioner to consider payment accordingly.
Alind Garg & Anr. v. Kundan Massey & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a review application and closure of plaintiffs' evidence due to repeated defaults and insufficient explanation for delay, emphasizing strict adherence to court schedules and CPC amendments.
Jiwan Kumar Goel v. M/S. Civitech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a suit against a company must be filed where the cause of action arises, not merely at the company's registered office, and admissions in pleadings can justify summary dismissal.
M/S ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTILLERS PVT. LTD. v. M/S SENTINO BIO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiff's interim injunction against defendants for trademark infringement and passing off of the mark "Officer's Special" deceptively similar to the registered trademark "Officer's Choice."
Vishwas Bhamburkar v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking FIR registration for a missing project report, emphasizing statutory remedies for non-registration of FIRs and the petitioner's lack of genuine public interest.
Raj Kumar Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging AICTE appointments for lack of maintainability and non-disclosure of prior litigation, emphasizing strict adherence to PIL principles and caution against misuse.
M/S PLANET COLORS ECO TOWNSHIPS LTD. v. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's writ petition and intra-court appeal seeking supervisory relief over mortgaged property development, holding that the statutory remedy of appeal to the Debt Recovery Tribunal under the SARFAESI Act precludes such interference.
Harvinder Singh Chadha v. Saran Kaur Chadha
The Delhi High Court held that the appellant had no legal share in the disputed property as ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and that an unregistered family settlement could not confer any rights, dismissing the suits and appeals for lack of maintainability.
Harvinder Singh Chadha v. Saran Kaur Chadha
The Delhi High Court held that the appellant had no legal share in the disputed property as it was self-acquired by his father post-Hindu Succession Act, and an unregistered family agreement purporting to gift shares was invalid, leading to dismissal of the suits and appeals.
Harvinder Singh Chadha v. Saran Kaur Chadha
The Delhi High Court held that property inherited after the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 is self-acquired, an unregistered gift is invalid, and dismissed suits claiming ancestral rights and ownership based on an unregistered family settlement.
Harvinder Singh Chadha v. Saran Kaur Chadha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the appellant had no legal share in the disputed property as ancestral property and dismissed his suits and appeals for lack of maintainability and cause of action.
M/S ALLIED BLENDERS & DISTILLERS PVT. LTD. v. SHREE NATH HERITAGE LIQUOR PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining use of the mark "Collector's Choice" as deceptively similar to the registered trademark "Officer's Choice" in alcoholic beverages, emphasizing consumer associative memory and likelihood of confusion.
Samanit Enterprises & Anr v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed four consolidated suits challenging demarcation reports and possession claims over disputed land, holding such challenges barred by res judicata and exclusive revenue authority jurisdiction.
Samanit Enterprises & Anr v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed four consolidated suits challenging demarcation reports and possession by DDA, holding such disputes are barred by res judicata and lie exclusively before revenue authorities, not civil courts.
Samanit Enterprises & Anr v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed four consolidated suits challenging a demarcation report and possession by the DDA, holding the suits barred by res judicata and exclusive revenue authority jurisdiction.
Samanit Enterprises & Anr v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed four consolidated suits challenging a demarcation report and possession by DDA, holding such disputes are barred by res judicata and fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of revenue authorities.
UNITED TELECOMS LTD v. IDBI BANK LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition restraining invocation of an unconditional bank guarantee, holding that only clear fraud or irretrievable injury justifies such injunctions, which were not established here.
STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC & ANR v. AJANTA PHARMA LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld an injunction restraining the defendant from using deceptively similar pharmaceutical trademarks to the plaintiff's registered mark CLINDOXYL, applying the anti-dissection rule and emphasizing public interest in preventing consumer confusion.