Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

M/S Rodenia (India) & Ors. v. Syndicate Bank

03 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3089

Where the decretal amount exceeds Rs. 10 lakhs, applications under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC must be filed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, and if filed before the civil court, they should be transferred rather than dismissed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Debt Recovery Tribunal jurisdiction ex parte decree

Aman Lekhi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Jul 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:3053

The Delhi High Court directed the Lieutenant Governor to examine the impact of the East Kidwai Nagar redevelopment project on infrastructure and residents' rights, emphasizing compliance with the Master Plan and statutory approvals before proceeding.

administrative other Significant redevelopment Master Plan of Delhi infrastructure impact right to life

Abhishek Kumar @ Bal Kishan v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Jul 2014 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:3087-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld CBSE's rule limiting name changes in certificates to within ten years of issuance, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to change his name retrospectively in educational certificates.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant name change CBSE Examination Bye-Laws Rule 69.[1]

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Dharmender Kumar & Ors.

03 Jul 2014 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2014:DHC:3091

The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award, affirming 60% disability and 100% functional loss of earning capacity for a rickshaw puller with below-knee amputation, and dismissed the insurer's appeal to reduce compensation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant functional disability physical disability loss of earning capacity non-pecuniary damages

Microsoft Corporation & Anr. v. Mr. Rajeev Trehan & Anr.

03 Jul 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:3094

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded damages against defendants for unauthorized hard disk loading of Microsoft software, affirming copyright infringement and endorsing punitive damages to deter piracy.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant copyright infringement computer software hard disk loading permanent injunction

Sushil Kumar Gupta v. The Chairman ECPF and Gratuity Trusts & Anr.

03 Jul 2014 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2014:DHC:3085

The Delhi High Court held that terminal benefits cannot be withheld without statutory authority or departmental proceedings, and ordered release of withheld benefits with interest to an employee retired while under suspension.

administrative petition_allowed Significant terminal benefits employer’s contribution to CPF gratuity withholding of benefits

Vodafone Spacetel Limited v. Vodafone Mobile Services Limited

03 Jul 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:3086

The Delhi High Court sanctioned Vodafone's Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, resolving objections and confirming regulatory compliance including DoT approval.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Section 391 to 394 Department of Telecommunication approval

Narinder Kumar & Ors. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-VII, Delhi

03 Jul 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vibhu BakhrU · 2014:DHC:3092-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the assessment notice and best judgment assessment, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the income tax assessment and revision order.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 143(2) notice best judgment assessment Section 144 Income Tax Act Section 68 additions

Gopal v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P.K. Bhasin; J.R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3084-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Industrial Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to decide sham contract issues not referred to it and that appellants failed to prove employer-employee relationship with BSNL, dismissing their claims for reinstatement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant employer-employee relationship industrial dispute sham contract industrial tribunal jurisdiction

T.C. Chawla v. C.B.I.

02 Jul 2014 · Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:3036
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted a Junior Engineer accused of accepting a bribe by holding that the statutory presumption under the Prevention of Corruption Act was successfully rebutted through credible defense evidence and contradictions in prosecution testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 20 statutory presumption bribery demand of illegal gratification

Rajesh Bhati v. The State NCT of Delhi

02 Jul 2014 · S.P. Garg · TR 2014:DHC:3032

The Delhi High Court disposed of the criminal appeal of Rajesh Bhati by referring to a common detailed judgment in a related case.

criminal other Procedural criminal appeal disposal common judgment Delhi High Court

Nepal Chand v. The State NCT of Delhi

02 Jul 2014 · S.P. Garg · TR 2014:DHC:3034

The Delhi High Court allowed the criminal appeal of Nepal Chand by applying the reasoning from a related common judgment in Man Mohan Vikal vs. State of NCT of Delhi.

criminal appeal_allowed Procedural appeal conviction Delhi High Court criminal appeal

Man Mohan Vikal v. The State of NCT of Delhi

02 Jul 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:3033

The Delhi High Court acquitted two accused of conspiracy charges due to lack of evidence but upheld the attempt to murder conviction against the third accused based on credible identification and injury evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal conspiracy Section 120B IPC attempt to murder Section 307 IPC

Gujarat Heavy Chemicals Ltd v. Union of India & Anr.

02 Jul 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:3035

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the Central Government's notification prohibiting contract labour in specified activities in limestone and dolomite mines, holding that procedural requirements under Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act were complied with and the prohibition was lawful.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 Section 10 notification prohibition of contract labour limestone and dolomite mines

Mona Kumari Dokania v. Surender Kumar Singh

02 Jul 2014 · Deepa Sharma · 2014:DHC:3051

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation awarded to a minor claimant in motor accident claims by applying correct multipliers and increasing non-pecuniary damages and interest in line with Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 loss of dependency multiplier compensation

Focus Energy Limited v. Neelam Devi & Ors.

02 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3049

The Delhi High Court upheld the imposition of a 25% penalty on the employer for delayed full payment of compensation under the Employee’s Compensation Act, emphasizing that penalty proceedings are separate and require a show cause notice.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4A(3)(b) penalty for delayed compensation show cause notice

National Insurance Co. Ltd v. Huma Kala & Ors.

02 Jul 2014 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2014:DHC:3037

The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurance company's appeal by reducing compensation in a fatal motor accident case, holding no contributory negligence on the deceased and adjusting income assessment to unskilled worker standards.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicle accident compensation contributory negligence income assessment

Bela Rani Bhattcharyya v. Union of India & Ors.

02 Jul 2014 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:3027-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions under Article 226 are not maintainable against COMPAT orders when an effective statutory appeal to the Supreme Court under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002 is available, except in limited circumstances.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 226 Constitution of India Section 53T Competition Act 2002 writ petition maintainability alternative remedy

Sumitra Parashar & Anr v. Raj Rani & Anr

02 Jul 2014 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:3026-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the allowance of amendment to the plaint after trial commencement to add reliefs arising post-institution of suit, emphasizing liberal approach to amendments within limitation to serve justice.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant amendment of plaint Order 6 Rule 17 CPC commencement of trial cause of action

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd v. M/S Toepfer International Asia Pte Ltd

02 Jul 2014 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:3022-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award on demurrage charges, ruling that courts cannot reappraise evidence or substitute their interpretation of contract terms if the arbitral tribunal's view is plausible, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial interference under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 37 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Judicial Review