Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Desh Raj v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3065-DB

Kumar Pal v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3064-DB

The Delhi High Court delivered a reserved judgment in Letters Patent Appeal No. 403/2013 involving Kumar Pal and Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd on July 3, 2014.

other other Letters Patent Appeal Delhi High Court Appellant Respondent

Bharat Singh v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3063-DB

Mahipal v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3062-DB

Hari Om Gupta v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3061-DB

Balbir Singh v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3060-DB

Judgment reserved and delivered in LPA No. 410/2013 between Balbir Singh and Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd by the Delhi High Court on 3rd July 2014.

other other LPA No. 410/2013 Delhi High Court Balbir Singh Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

Rohtash Kumar v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3059-DB

Kumar Pal v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3058-DB

Birpal v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3077-DB

Attar Singh v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3078-DB

Praveen Kumar v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3079-DB

Mam Chand v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3080-DB

Sanjay Kumar v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

03 Jul 2014 · P. K. Bhasin; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:3081-DB

Mukhtiar Singh @ Babloo v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

03 Jul 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:3082

The Delhi High Court affirmed convictions under the NDPS Act but modified sentences considering appellants' mitigating circumstances and economic conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed NDPS Act Section 15 NDPS Act Section 25 NDPS Act conviction

Mukhtiar Singh @ Babloo v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

03 Jul 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:3083

The Delhi High Court affirmed convictions under the NDPS Act but modified sentences based on mitigating factors including economic hardship and prior incarceration.

criminal appeal_allowed NDPS Act Section 15 NDPS Act Section 25 NDPS Act conviction

Daya Ram v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Jul 2014 · S.P. Garg · TR 2014:DHC:3057

The High Court of Delhi allowed the appeals of Daya Ram and Mukesh Kumar against their convictions by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case.

criminal appeal_allowed Procedural appeal conviction criminal case High Court of Delhi

Daya Ram v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Jul 2014 · S.P. Garg · TR 2014:DHC:3056

The Delhi High Court allowed the criminal appeals of Daya Ram and Mukesh Kumar by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related appeal.

criminal appeal_allowed Procedural criminal appeal conviction Delhi High Court appellate judgment

Rajesh Kumar @ Sanjay v. State of NCT Delhi

03 Jul 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:3055

The Delhi High Court set aside convictions under the NDPS Act due to material contradictions in police evidence and failure to associate independent public witnesses, emphasizing the need for strict proof in narcotics cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act possession of ganja independent public witness contradictions in police testimony

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Om Prakash & Ors.

03 Jul 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:3052

The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim, affirming that the multiplier is based on the deceased's age and a 50% addition to income for future prospects is justified for victims below 40 years.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim multiplier future prospects compensation

Ashwani Kumar Aggarwal v. B K Mittal

03 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3090

The Delhi High Court held that probate of a photocopy of a Will cannot be granted without credible evidence under Section 237 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, proving the original Will was lost or destroyed otherwise than by the testator's intentional act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 237 probate of Will copy of Will