Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Municipal Employees Union and Anr v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

08 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2542

The Delhi High Court held that while administrative help desks may assist workmen in pending industrial dispute cases, only the Tribunal can adjudicate claims and calculate dues under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor petition_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C(2) Central Government Industrial Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Hema Kalwani & Anr. v. Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr.

08 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2477-DB

The Delhi High Court held that cooperative society members cannot be forced to join a balcony extension project or pay for it, and any damage caused must be restored by the society without compromising building stability.

civil petition_allowed Significant Balcony Extension Project Cooperative Housing Society Unwilling Members Extra FAR

Union of India and Ors. v. Rameshwar Tiwari

08 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2504-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld pension entitlement for an employee confirmed against a permanent post despite initial temporary appointment, restricting arrears payment to three years prior to claim, following binding precedents.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant pensionary benefits temporary appointment confirmation pension arrears

Shivam Iron Store v. Union of India

08 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2475-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST order for fraudulent ITC, holding that the petitioner was supplied relied upon documents and must avail statutory appeal remedies, with no violation of natural justice.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 show cause notice reliance upon documents

HVR Solar Private Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 67 & Anr.

08 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2476-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a personal hearing is mandatory under Section 161 of the DGST Act before rejecting a rectification application that adversely affects a party, setting aside the impugned order for non-compliance with natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 161 DGST Act rectification of order input tax credit natural justice

Jiya Sharma v. Deepak Sharma

08 Apr 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:2499
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for partition of alleged HUF properties for failure to plead the existence and constitution of the HUF with requisite particulars, holding that such deficiency warrants rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Undivided Family Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action partition suit

Ashish Dubey v. Sara Carriere Dubey

08 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2465-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to structure a visitation schedule during school breaks, emphasizing the children's welfare and preferences with equitable expense sharing.

family appeal_allowed child custody visitation rights family court welfare of the child

Satish Kumar v. Attar Singh and Ors.

08 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2498

The High Court upheld the summary dismissal of an Objection Petition resisting eviction execution due to lack of credible evidence of tenancy, dismissing the petition challenging the eviction decree.

civil petition_dismissed Objection Petition Order XXI Rule 58 CPC Delhi Rent Control Act Eviction decree

Seema Malhotra v. Rakesh Nagpal

08 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2497

The Delhi High Court granted a limited two-month extension to the judgment debtor to vacate the property in execution proceedings, subject to strict conditions and warning of contempt for non-compliance.

civil other execution proceedings warrant of possession vacant possession extension of time

Nizam Sheikh v. Alimuddin

08 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2496
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court set aside arrest warrants issued without following mandatory procedural safeguards under Section 51 and Order XXI Rules 37 and 40 CPC, emphasizing strict adherence to protect the judgment-debtor's fundamental right to personal liberty.

civil appeal_allowed Significant civil imprisonment execution of decree Section 51 CPC Order XXI Rule 37 CPC

Devender Kumar v. M/S Nexus Life Science India Pvt Ltd

08 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2494

The Delhi High Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration of setting aside an ex-parte order, directing exclusion of the Covid-19 period from limitation as per Supreme Court guidelines.

civil remanded Significant ex-parte order setting aside ex-parte limitation period Covid-19 pandemic

Munni Devi v. Tele Wood

08 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2493

The High Court allowed the petition to disregard rebuttal evidence and directed the Trial Court to proceed expeditiously with final arguments to avoid delay.

civil petition_allowed Order XVIII Rule 3 CPC Section 151 CPC rebuttal evidence trial court discretion

Yogeshwar Dayal v. The Vishnu Urban Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd & Anr

08 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2471-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Cooperative Tribunal to expeditiously hear the petitioner’s stay application without setting aside the dismissal of his application to summon records from other arbitration cases.

civil petition_dismissed Delhi Cooperative Tribunal surety liability arbitration award Article 226

Sunil Tomar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr

08 Apr 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:2460

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR registered under IPC and Arms Act based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, applying the principles of abuse of process and interest of justice under Section 528 BNSS, 2023.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS 2023 amicable settlement domestic dispute

Priyanka v. Saurabh Chhabra

08 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2417-DB

Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act against a procedural interlocutory order directing hearing sequence is not maintainable and is dismissed.

family appeal_dismissed Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19 appeal interlocutory order procedural order

Broadcasting Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Apr 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:2405

The Delhi High Court upheld TDSAT's modification of interim orders allowing an MSO to offer a broadcaster's channels on an a-la-carte basis, holding that broadcasters cannot demand bouquet inclusion under the Interconnection Regulations, 2017.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Interconnection Regulations, 2017 Channel Placement Agreement Logical Channel Number (LCN) Bouquet of channels

State v. Manish Yadav

08 Apr 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:2424

The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused in a sexual assault case due to lack of prima facie evidence, inordinate delay in FIR, and inconsistencies in prosecution material.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant prima facie case framing of charge sexual assault delay in FIR

MS S v. State and Others

08 Apr 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:2421

The Delhi High Court set aside the Sessions Court's discharge of the accused in a sexual assault case, holding that at the charge framing stage, the court must not conduct a mini trial and must frame charges if a prima facie case exists based on the prosecutrix's statement and medical evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant charge framing discharge of accused Section 164 CrPC statement sexual assault

Wikimedia Foundation Inc v. ANI Media Private Limited & Ors.

08 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2469-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction directing Wikimedia to remove defamatory content against ANI on Wikipedia within 36 hours, clarifying intermediary liability and safe harbour obligations under the IT Act and Rules.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant intermediary liability defamation Information Technology Act, 2000 IT Rules, 2021

Union of India v. Jasbir Singh

08 Apr 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:2404

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging an arbitral award awarding compensation and interest to the contractor for delays and additional expenses, upholding the award under limited judicial review.

civil petition_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Arbitral award Delay in contract completion