Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Nitin Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the jurisdiction of DRI officials as proper officers and allowed the petitioner to challenge the penalty order before CESTAT within an extended limitation period.
M/S Mahalaxmi Jewel Exports & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded the matter to CESTAT for adjudication after the Supreme Court clarified that DRI officers are proper officers competent to issue show cause notices under Section 28 of the Customs Act.
M/S YUKTI EXPORTS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the jurisdiction of DRI officials to issue show cause notices and allowed the petitioner to challenge the order before CESTAT and file a reply to the DGFT notice, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
M/S Mahalaxmi Jewel Exports v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging DRI officials' jurisdiction to issue show cause notices under Section 28 of the Customs Act, following the Supreme Court's Canon-II ruling, and directed service of the adjudication order to enable timely appeal.
M/S Bimal Papers Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the jurisdiction of DRI officers to issue Show Cause Notices under Section 28 of the Customs Act, following the Supreme Court's authoritative review ruling affirming such officers as proper officers.
Rajiv Shewaramani v. Commissioner of Customs (Import) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Customs Show Cause Notice and Order-in-Original, directing the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 128 of the Customs Act within an extended period.
Rajiv Shewaramani v. Commissioner of Customs (Import) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Show Cause Notice and Order-in-Original under the Customs Act, permitting the petitioner to file a statutory appeal with extended limitation.
Suman Singh Virk & Anr. v. Deepika Prashar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition by directing a practical arrangement for the petitioners' access to their portion of a common property floor, emphasizing compliance with court orders and coordination with tenants.
Paresh K Daftary v. Additional Director General
The Delhi High Court, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Canon-II, held that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appeals, dismissing writ petitions challenging jurisdiction.
M/S. RANI ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, ICD, PATPARGANJ & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of DRI officials as 'proper officers' under the Customs Act, following the Supreme Court's authoritative clarification in Canon-II.
Shri Ajay Saini v. Intelligence Officer DRI Headquarters & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the jurisdiction of DRI officials as proper officers under the Customs Act, following the Supreme Court's review decision affirming their authority to issue show cause notices and conduct proceedings.
Shail Singhal v. Additional Director Directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the jurisdiction of DRI officials as proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, following the Supreme Court's authoritative ruling affirming their competence to issue show cause notices.
Commissioner of Customs (Import), ICD, TKD, New Delhi v. Ashok Singhla
The Delhi High Court allowed the Customs Department's appeal, setting aside CESTAT's order and remanding the matter for adjudication in line with the Supreme Court's ruling that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Commissioner of Customs (Import) v. M/s N. V. Distilleries and Breweries Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the Customs Department's appeal, setting aside the CESTAT order and remanding the matter for adjudication in line with the Supreme Court's clarification that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Commissioner of Customs (Import) v. M/S Ajanta Overseas
The Delhi High Court allowed the Customs Department's appeal, setting aside CESTAT's order and remanding the matter for adjudication, following the Supreme Court's clarification that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Arya Suresh v. M/S Venus Industries
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeals setting aside CESTAT orders quashing show cause notices, holding that officers specified under Section 28 of the Customs Act are proper officers competent to issue such notices, and remanded the matters for adjudication on merits.
Municipal Employees Union and Anr v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that while administrative help desks may assist workmen in pending industrial dispute cases, only the Tribunal can adjudicate claims and calculate dues under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Hema Kalwani & Anr. v. Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that cooperative society members cannot be forced to join a balcony extension project or pay for it, and any damage caused must be restored by the society without compromising building stability.
Union of India and Ors. v. Rameshwar Tiwari
The Delhi High Court upheld pension entitlement for an employee confirmed against a permanent post despite initial temporary appointment, restricting arrears payment to three years prior to claim, following binding precedents.
Shivam Iron Store v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST order for fraudulent ITC, holding that the petitioner was supplied relied upon documents and must avail statutory appeal remedies, with no violation of natural justice.