Vijender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 09 Apr 2025 · 2025:DHC:3041-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul
W.P.(C) 5472/2025
2025:DHC:3041-DB
administrative other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to decide the petitioner’s representation against his transfer within three weeks and stayed the transfer pending such decision due to his son's serious medical condition.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 5472/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 5472/2025 & CM APPL. 24938/2025
VIJENDER SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vivek Sheel, Ms. Deepshikha and Mr. Anshul Mahajan, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Ms. Samiksha, Mr. Ankur Yadav and Mr. Devender Singh, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL)
28.04.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. By this writ petition, the petitioner challenges his transfer to Arunachal Pradesh.

2. The petitioner submits that his son is 100% cerebrally disabled and is undergoing treatment at Medanta Hospital, Gurugram.

3. The petitioner himself belongs to Low Medical Category and has been categorized as SHAPE–A2(L).

4. The petitioner has admittedly addressed the representation to respondents on 9 April 2025. W.P.(C) 5472/2025

5. Mr. Tiwari, learned SPC for the respondents, undertakes, on instructions, that the representation would be decided within a period of three weeks from today and that the transfer would not be implemented till the decision on the representation is conveyed to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, we dispose of this writ petition with directions to the respondents to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner within three weeks and convey its decision to the petitioner forthwith.

7. Till the decision is taken, the respondent would not insist on the petitioner joining at Arunachal Pradesh.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.