Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
M/S PANJWANI PACKAGING LTD. & ORS. v. ALLAHABAD BANK
The Delhi High Court held that money wrongly credited by a bank to a customer's account constitutes a recoverable debt under the RDDBFI Act, and the limitation period begins from the date of discovery of the mistake.
UDAY FOUNDATION FOR CONGENITAL DEFECTS AND RARE BLOOD GROUPS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed FSSAI to convert expert-formulated guidelines on nutritious and safe school food into enforceable regulations, while rejecting calls to mandate the term 'junk food', and emphasized administrative enforcement to protect children's health.
Deepak Yadav v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 33 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, restricting transfer of agricultural land to prevent fragmentation below eight standard acres, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge under Articles 14 and 19.
Kishinchand Choithram Daryanani v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed timely decision on the petitioner's land-related applications and held that a writ petition challenging demarcation is not maintainable when an appeal is pending.
Charan Singh Sharma v. Veena Devi & Ors.
The court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw a suit barred by res judicata and permitted pursuing an earlier suit with liberty to seek amendments.
Mr. M.A.Niyazi, Adv. with Ms. Anamika Niyazi, Advocates. v. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION& ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court held that teachers employed on continuous contractual appointments in Army Public School are statutory employees entitled to confirmation after three years, invalidating illegal terminations and overruling attempts to deny regularization.
Reena Jain v. Rishab Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court disposed of the execution petition enforcing a consent decree related to matrimonial arrangements, directing the Judgment Debtor to furnish payment details and allowing the Decree Holder to pursue remedies in pending Family Court proceedings.
Kapil Kumar Ahluwalia v. Arvind Brands & Anr
The Delhi High Court returned the plaint to the plaintiff for presentation before the court having appropriate pecuniary jurisdiction, directing the parties to proceed without delay.
Neraj Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CRPF personnel posted in Jammu & Kashmir are entitled to retain family accommodation in Dwarka for the duration of their posting, quashing penal rent and eviction orders based on an arbitrary four-year retention policy.
Naveen Malhotra v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to transfer cheque bounce complaint cases, holding that once evidence recording under Section 145(2) NI Act has commenced, transfer is not permissible under Supreme Court precedent.
North Delhi Power Ltd v. Sarover Hospital & Anr
Appeals against an order of acquittal in complaint cases are not maintainable without prior grant of special leave to appeal under Section 378 CrPC, and failure to comply mandates dismissal.
Commissioner of Income Tax-VI v. Wellworth Construction Udyog Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order dismissing the Revenue's appeal, ruling that suspicion alone cannot justify additions under Section 68 without concrete evidence disproving the genuineness and creditworthiness of share applicants.
Brahm Dev Gupta v. Container Corporation of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that CONCOR is a railway administration under the Indian Railways Act, 1989, limiting its liability for consignment loss by fire to Rs. 50 per kg, dismissing the plaintiff's claim for full invoice value compensation.
SH V K JAIN v. Delhi Pollution Control Committee
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking retrospective promotions due to delay and failure to comply with procedural requirements for departmental promotion.
CIT v. M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order deleting additions relating to non-refundable deposits and transfer pricing interest adjustments, affirming proper income recognition and relevant benchmarking principles.
North Delhi Power Ltd v. Sarover Hospital & Anr
Appeals against acquittal orders in complaint cases are not maintainable without prior special leave from the High Court under Section 378 CrPC, and failure to comply mandates dismissal of such appeals.
Prithvi Raj v. NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a bona fide settlement between parties, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Neeraj Beniwal & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR but granted interim bail to the petitioners subject to bail bonds and sureties during ongoing investigation.
Rajesh Kumar v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Ors.
The High Court declined to quash a criminal complaint under Section 138 NI Act prematurely, directing the petitioner to raise all objections before the trial court at the framing of Notice stage under Section 251 Cr.P.C.
Pankaj Rajput @ Bunty & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 307, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC.