Delhi High Court

93,877 judgments

Year:

e55391bc62361e65358331013406a825feee1e9ac25e7629b89f95354e6fe477

24 Feb 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:10972

The Delhi High Court held that disputes regarding street vendors' rights under the Street Vendors Act, 2014 must be resolved by the Town Vending Committee, directing its constitution and functioning, and declined to grant interim injunctions restraining eviction.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 Section 3(3) Town Vending Committee street vendors

M/S. SAGAR RATNA RESTAURANTS PVT. LTD. v. TARSEEM KUMAR

24 Feb 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:1727

The Delhi High Court appointed a fresh Receiver to manage a disputed restaurant business pending arbitration, emphasizing party cooperation and limiting modification of Court orders to the scope permitted by appellate directions.

civil other Significant Receiver appointment Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Commercial lease dispute Confidential information

Surjeet Singh Kalra & Ors. v. Darshan Lal & Anr.

24 Feb 2015 · Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:1733

The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an ex-parte eviction order under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, holding that sufficient cause was shown due to inadvertent non-appearance and timely application after knowledge of the order.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order 9 Rule 13 CPC ex-parte order sufficient cause setting aside ex-parte order

Manjit Singh v. Vani Jain

24 Feb 2015 · Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:1736

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding the landlord's bonafide business requirement genuine and tenant estopped from disputing landlord's title after long rent payment.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction bonafide requirement

Neeraj v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

24 Feb 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:1760-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside murder convictions due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and lack of corroborative evidence, granting the appellants benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC Eyewitness testimony Benefit of doubt

M/S. APEX ENCON PROJECTS PVT. LTD. DELHI v. DIRECTOR GENERAL MARRIED ACCOMMODATION PROJECT

24 Feb 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:1763-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner’s bid for balance work on a cancelled contract, affirming the employer’s contractual right to exclude the original contractor from completing abandoned work.

administrative petition_dismissed contract cancellation balance work tender eligibility contractual conditions

Union of India v. Jai Singh & Anr

24 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1744

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal against the compensation awarded to an injured non-employee by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, holding that the claim was maintainable only before the Claims Tribunal and the quantum was not excessive.

civil appeal_dismissed Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Compensation Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Motor vehicular accident

Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. v. Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd.

24 Feb 2015 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:1721-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the State of Chhattisgarh had no authority to reopen finalized Prospecting Licence applications disposed of by Madhya Pradesh before reorganization, rendering the subsequent grant of licence and mining lease to Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. void and dismissing their appeals.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Prospecting Licence Mining Lease Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 State Reorganization

Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

24 Feb 2015 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:1723-DB

Judgment of the Delhi High Court in LPA 205/2011 involving Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd and Union of India, pronouncing orders on February 24, 2015.

other other Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd Union of India Delhi High Court Letters Patent Appeal

Padmini Hindupur v. Abhijit S Bellur

24 Feb 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:1722

Delhi High Court granted an anti-suit injunction restraining foreign divorce proceedings in Maryland, USA, holding that the plaintiff had not submitted to foreign jurisdiction and that Indian courts have territorial jurisdiction over the matrimonial dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant anti-suit injunction territorial jurisdiction foreign judgment recognition Section 13 CPC

Kusum & Anr. v. Reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd & Ors.

24 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1748

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, holding that compensation must be awarded strictly as per the Second Schedule without requiring proof of negligence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163-A Second Schedule multiplier

Tractel Tirfor India Pvt. Ltd. v. Nehru Place Hotels Ltd and Anr.

24 Feb 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:1724

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding the petitioner liable to refund compensation for deaths of workers during contract performance, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 employee liability compensation

Delhi Development Authority v. Mohd. Sher Nabi Chaman & Ors.

24 Feb 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:1765

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging a consent order disposing of a land dispute suit, affirming the validity of modern demarcation methods and the binding nature of consent orders in land possession cases involving government land.

civil petition_dismissed Significant consent order land demarcation Total Station Method Delhi Development Authority

Commissioner of Police and Ors. v. Ex Const Raj Kumar

24 Feb 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; I.S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:1764-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside the disciplinary dismissal of a constable due to violation of natural justice by non-supply of inquiry report and appellate authority's jurisdictional overreach.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant natural justice inquiry report supply disciplinary authority appellate authority

Naresh Kumar Sodhi & Ors. v. Hari Ram Chaurasia & Anr

24 Feb 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:1761

The Delhi High Court dismissed the regular second appeal in a property possession suit, holding that non-filing of replication does not amount to admission and that disputes over property dimensions are questions of fact not warranting interference in a second appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed regular second appeal Order VI Rule 1 CPC pleadings replication

Radha Krishan v. Union of India & Anr

24 Feb 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:1762

The Delhi High Court held that freedom fighter pension claims must be evaluated on a preponderance of probabilities with a liberal approach, setting aside the rejection of a 97-year-old petitioner and directing grant of pension with interest from the date of application.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme freedom fighter pension standard of proof preponderance of probabilities

R.P. Sharma v. D.K. Kaushik

24 Feb 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:1770

The court dismissed the intervenors' application for impleadment in a suit for specific performance, holding that only contracting parties are necessary and proper parties and third parties with independent claims cannot be impleaded to alter the suit's nature.

civil petition_dismissed Significant specific performance necessary parties Order I Rule 10 CPC Hindu Succession Act

R.K. Saxena v. Union of India

24 Feb 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; I.S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:1769-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging CAT orders denying promotion benefits due to inordinate delay and potential disruption of seniority lists, affirming that delay and laches bar relief in administrative promotion claims.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant promotion seniority delay laches

Pradeep Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

24 Feb 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:1755

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Shailesh Harishchandra Rajadhyaksha & Ors. v. Registrar of Companies & Anr.

24 Feb 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:1754

The High Court declined to quash criminal complaints under the Companies Act at the pre-notice stage, directing petitioners to raise objections before the trial court at framing of Notice under Section 251 CrPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 251 CrPC quashing petition Companies Act 1956