Delhi High Court

93,877 judgments

Year:

Tasleem @ Hattu v. The State (G.N.C.T of Delhi)

26 Feb 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:1848-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for the rape and murder of his minor sister, relying on credible eyewitness testimony and corroborative medical evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder rape sexual assault throttling

Pran Mehra v. Competition Commission of India

26 Feb 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:1850

The Delhi High Court held that proceedings against key-persons under the Competition Act can be initiated without a prior finding against the company and must be adjudicated in a single consolidated process.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Competition Act, 2002 Section 48 Section 27 key-persons liability

Pran Mehra v. Competition Commission of India & Anr.

26 Feb 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:1847

The Delhi High Court held that proceedings against key-persons under the Competition Act can proceed concurrently with those against the company without awaiting a finding of contravention, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the process as premature.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Competition Act, 2002 Section 48 Section 27 key-persons liability

Pran Mehra v. Competition Commission of India & Anr.

26 Feb 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:1846

The Delhi High Court held that proceedings under the Competition Act against key-persons and the company must be conducted together without bifurcation, dismissing the petitioners’ challenge to the premature initiation of proceedings against them.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Competition Act, 2002 Section 48 Section 27 key-person liability

Union of India v. R.C. Bakshi

26 Feb 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; I.S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:1862-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that deemed suspension under CCS (CCA) Rules ends upon acquittal and suspension cannot be extended without a fresh order and pending disciplinary proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant deemed suspension CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 Rule 10(2) Rule 10(5)(b)

Saraswati College of Education & Anr v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr

26 Feb 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:10985

The Delhi High Court held that applications for recognition of teacher education courses must be processed according to statutory procedure and timelines, allowing petitioners to apply afresh for the 2016-17 academic year despite prior rejection.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recognition of teacher education courses National Council for Teacher Education statutory procedure opportunity of hearing

Tahir Hussain v. Central Bureau of Investigation

26 Feb 2015 · Sunita Gupta · 2015:DHC:1859

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant’s applications for suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC, holding that the serious nature of forgery offences outweighs personal hardships during the pendency of appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 389 CrPC suspension of sentence forged non-judicial stamp papers interim suspension

State v. Rajeev Bharti & Anr.

26 Feb 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:1861

The Delhi High Court allowed the State's petition to condone delay and restore the revision petition challenging the discharge of accused, holding that limitation cannot bar revision when clear illegality is shown.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay revision petition Section 397 Cr.P.C. discharge order

Prem v. Arya Samaj Saket

26 Feb 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:1853

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal holding that oral assurances cannot confer permanent rights in immovable property, upheld revocation of license, and imposed costs for false claims and abuse of judicial process.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant licensee possession oral assurance permanent right

Ram Chandra Krishan Chandra v. Sansar Chandra Kapoor

26 Feb 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:1854

The Delhi High Court allowed appeals by recording and enforcing a lawful settlement between landlord and tenant parties under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC, directing possession handover and payment of agreed amounts.

civil appeal_allowed settlement Order 23 Rule 3 CPC landlord-tenant dispute possession

Ram Chandra Krishan Chandra v. Sansar Chandra Kapoor

26 Feb 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:1851

The Delhi High Court recorded and decreed a lawful settlement under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC in landlord-tenant appeals, directing possession handover, payment of use charges, and release of deposited amounts.

civil appeal_allowed Order 23 Rule 3 CPC settlement landlord-tenant dispute possession

National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Smt. Shabana & Ors.

26 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1825

The Delhi High Court reduced motor accident compensation by disallowing future prospects addition for a self-employed deceased, following binding Supreme Court precedent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation future prospects self-employed deceased addition to income

The New India Assurance Company Ltd v. Rukma Devi & Ors.

26 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1819

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal reducing compensation by disallowing future prospects addition without evidence and correcting personal expense deductions, following binding Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant future prospects motor accident compensation loss of dependency deduction for personal expenses

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Suda & Ors.

26 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1820

The Delhi High Court reduced motor accident compensation by deleting unjustified addition for future prospects in absence of evidence, upholding negligence findings and following binding Supreme Court precedent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation future prospects loss of dependency

Kalawati Devi & Ors. v. Anil Kumar & Ors.

26 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1821

The Delhi High Court held that a registered owner who complies with statutory transfer requirements under Section 50 of the Motor Vehicles Act is not liable for compensation, enhanced the claimants' compensation for loss of dependency, and clarified enforcement and recovery rights in composite negligence cases.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 50 Composite negligence Loss of dependency

Kalawati Devi & Ors. v. Anil Kumar & Ors.

26 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1822

The Delhi High Court held that a registered owner who duly informs the registering authority of vehicle transfer is not liable for compensation post-transfer, and in composite negligence cases, claimants may enforce awards against any tortfeasor and insurer, enhancing compensation with future prospects.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 50 composite negligence motor accident compensation

M/S National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Master Ravi Kumar & Ors.

26 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1823

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals by the National Insurance Company, holding that the insurer failed to prove conscious and willful breach of policy terms and thus could not be exonerated from liability or granted recovery rights.

civil appeal_dismissed insurance policy breach conscious and willful breach valid driving license motor accident claim

M/S National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Master Ravi Kumar & Ors.

26 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1814

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals by the National Insurance Company, holding that mere absence of a valid driving license does not absolve the insurer from liability without proof of conscious and willful breach of policy terms.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance policy breach conscious and willful breach valid driving license motor accident claim

General Trading Corporation & Anr v. M/S Vijay Construction & Anr

26 Feb 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:1824

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for non-prosecution due to the plaintiffs' failure to serve summons and prosecute the suit diligently.

civil appeal_dismissed non-prosecution dismissal in default service of summons substituted service

M/S JIWAN INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD v. M/S ANUPAM PRODUCTS LTD. & OTHERS

26 Feb 2015 · Manmohan · 2015:DHC:1858

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to clarify parties and place a new site plan on record, emphasizing a liberal approach to amendments under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC without altering the suit's nature.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 6 Rule 17 CPC amendment of plaint liberal approach to amendment cause of action