Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Mahender Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under matrimonial offences based on amicable mediated settlements, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Mohd Azeemullah & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 448, 468, 471, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Monu @ Rajeev v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs under Sections 323/324 and 326/34 IPC on the basis of a genuine compromise between related parties, applying the principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC.
Jayant Kumar Trehan v. HDFC Bank Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for mesne profits filed after a decree for possession is maintainable and not barred under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC, dismissing the defendant's application to reject the plaint.
Monu @ Rajeev v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under Sections 323/324 and 326/34 IPC based on a compromise between parties, applying the principles under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice in non-heinous offences.
Kamal Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 337 IPC on the ground of accidental injury and amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Baiju Kumar Yadav v. Anupam Soni & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Section 381 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles governing the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sube Singh Janghu v. Registrar General, Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court quashed the disciplinary penalty imposed on a court employee for missing records, holding that systemic failures and overburdened conditions absolved him of personal liability.
Rukhsana v. Nawab Ali & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed pre-arrest bail granted on a settlement due to non-compliance and allowed the accused to apply afresh for bail on merits with conditions.
Vinod Thakur v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420 and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Jagdish Khurana v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 337 IPC on the ground of accidental injury and full compensation to the complainant, applying the principles of compromise and inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Union of India v. Daya Nand
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing the grant of financial upgradations under the ACP scheme to an employee absorbed after medical de-categorization, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition.
Meenu Upadhyay v. Kanwar Pal Singh
The Delhi High Court held that a decree under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC can be granted only on clear and unequivocal admissions, and dismissed the plaintiff's application where the defendant disputed the admission as made under undue pressure.
Shanta Duneja v. MCD and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that while covering a courtyard in DDA flats may be permitted, using the terrace formed above it in a manner infringing on a neighbour's privacy is impermissible and directed restoration of the original condition.
Meera Dhingra v. Deepak Kapoor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enforced a settlement agreement transferring ownership of disputed properties upon payment, ordered direct release of settlement funds, and declared the defendant as absolute owner.
Shiv Industries v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's second appeal, upholding concurrent findings that failure of the proprietor to testify and lack of evidence on staleness justified dismissal of the suit seeking injunction against recovery of electricity theft charges.
Rajesh Kumar v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Ors.
The High Court declined to quash proceedings under Section 138 NI Act prematurely, directing the petitioner to raise all pleas before the trial court at the framing of Notice stage under Section 251 CrPC.
Rajesh Kumar v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court refused to quash a Section 138 NI Act complaint before framing of Notice under Section 251 CrPC, directing the trial court to decide jurisdictional and other pleas at that stage.
Transport Corporation of India Ltd v. Reserve Bank of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court condoned a 111-day delay in filing a written statement due to pendency of an Order VII Rule 11 application and document collation difficulties, imposing costs to deter delay.
Ankur Drugs & Pharma Ltd. & Anr. v. S.E. Investment Limited
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration proceedings against a guarantor of a loan availed by a sick company are stayed under Section 22 SICA unless BIFR consents, overruling the arbitrator's order allowing continuation.