Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
Ishmani and Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on amicable settlement and divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Budh Prakash Alias Bali and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Satish Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287 and 338 IPC based on a settlement between parties, emphasizing the cautious exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in non-compoundable offences.
Saurabh & Anr v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking quashing of FIR under Section 363 IPC involving disputed marriageable age, directing investigation to proceed and denying interim protection.
Babu Ram v. State Govt. NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed registration of FIR and investigation based on CCTV evidence, setting aside lower courts' refusal to order inquiry under Section 156(3) CrPC.
Aatif Khan v. The State Govt of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 482 CrPC based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Subhash Raturi and Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties at the investigation stage, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Rohit and Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 427, 452, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Mohsin and Anr. v. State and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a motor accident FIR under Sections 279/304A/337 IPC and Motor Vehicles Act based on an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences in appropriate cases.
Tahir Hussain v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court maintained the convictions of appellants involved in forged stamp paper trade but modified their sentences and fines based on time served and role in the offence, granting remission accordingly.
Shyam Private Industrial Training Institute v. Directorate General of Employment & Training
The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to consider accreditation applications submitted before the cut-off date subject to conditions, enabling petitioners to admit students in the current academic year.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-15 v. Shri Prem Prakash Garg
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tax department's appeals against the respondent's reassessment for AY 2004-05, holding that protective additions cannot survive once the substantive addition against the primary assessee is annulled on limitation grounds.
Babu Ram v. State Govt. NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing police to register FIR and investigate alleged forcible entry and property damage substantiated by CCTV footage, emphasizing the mandatory duty of police to investigate cognizable offences.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) v. M/S Best IT World (India) Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the defendant from importing devices infringing the plaintiff's standard essential patents, holding that the suit was maintainable and the defendant's refusal to negotiate FRAND licensing was unjustified.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Surinder Singh
The Delhi High Court set aside the Industrial Tribunal's rejection of approval for removal of a workman under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, remanding the matter for fresh consideration of evidence regarding payment of one month's wages.
Manushi Sangathan, Delhi v. Govt. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that public parking facilities must be used exclusively for parking and rejected the Ram Lila Committee's claim to use the Parade Ground surface area for religious festivals, emphasizing adherence to statutory land use plans and reasonable restrictions on religious freedoms.
Ramesh Negi v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that private unaided schools have autonomy in nursery admissions and the PWD Act’s admission rights for children with disabilities are limited to the 25% RTE reservation, dismissing a petition seeking mandamus for admission of an autistic child under the CWSN category.
Adesh Kumar Gupta v. CBI
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and investigation permission granted under section 155 CrPC due to non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements and barred the proceedings as time-barred.
R.L. Kala & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that BRO draughtsmen are not entitled to pay scale parity with other departments under the 5th CPC recommendations absent identical cadre and service conditions, but those promoted to Chief Draughtsman are entitled to higher pay scales and pension benefits.
Arun Chopra v. Shyam Sunder
The Delhi High Court disposed of an execution petition as satisfied upon the Judgment Debtor filing an affidavit in compliance with a court-recorded settlement.