Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
Directorate General of Foreign Trade v. M/S Masumi Overseas Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that an amendment to a writ petition introducing a new cause of action and challenging a distinct Show Cause Notice issued by a different territorial office is impermissible and must be challenged separately before the appropriate court.
DALMIA CONSUMER CARE PVT. LTD. v. PAHARPUR 3P
The High Court held that share application money may be reflected as unsecured loans under the Companies Act only if validated by proper resolutions, and dismissed the appeal directing the Company Judge to examine the genuineness of such claims.
Microsoft Corporation & Ors. v. Satish Parakh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit based on a joint out-of-court settlement acknowledging plaintiffs' intellectual property rights and payment of litigation expenses, disposing of the suit accordingly.
Meenakshi Gautham v. PK Pradhan & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that failure to implement a court-ordered short-term rural health practitioner course amounts to contempt, directing the government to legally recognize and enable graduates to practice modern medicine to address rural healthcare shortages.
Ashiana Housing Ltd. v. M/S Total Property Solutions
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and punitive damages to Ashiana Housing Ltd. against a defendant for unauthorized use of its registered trademark and passing off in an ex-parte suit.
Mohan Gupta v. B.K. Nagpal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition, upholding eviction on the ground of bona fide requirement by the landlord and estoppel against the tenant disputing ownership after attornment of rent.
Nikhil Vig & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties.
Mahesh Chander Joshi v. Mahkarwati & Another
The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiff's entitlement to possession of properties under a compromise deed and passed decree on admissions under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, rejecting defendants' fraud plea.
FAST BOOKING (I) PVT. LTD. v. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -11(1)
The Delhi High Court held that the ITAT erred in refusing to consider the assessee's cross objections claiming benefits under Section 10A, restoring the cross objections for merits despite them not being raised before the CIT(A).
Commissioner of Income Tax-20 v. Priyanka Singhania
The Delhi High Court held that proceedings under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act cannot be initiated without a search warrant issued in the name of the person concerned, dismissing the Revenue's appeal for lack of such warrant against the respondent.
CIT v. Sanjay Kumar Garg
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's annulment of reassessment orders as barred by limitation, holding that fresh reassessment notices cannot be issued while earlier reassessment proceedings are pending.
Cheminvest Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax-VI
The Delhi High Court held that disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot be made in an assessment year where no exempt income has been earned or received by the assessee.
Delhi State Industrial Development Corporation v. Mohan Construction Company
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award largely but reduced the awarded amount by setting aside certain claims, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ravi Dutt Pathak
The Delhi High Court held that promotion eligibility and disciplinary proceedings must be assessed as of the date of eligibility, and recommendations cannot be kept in sealed cover due to subsequent criminal prosecution, dismissing the Union of India's appeal.
Farida Begum Biswas v. Union of India; Barik Biswas v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging provisional attachment and show cause notice under the PMLA as premature, emphasizing the statutory adjudication and appeal mechanism must be exhausted first.
Farida Begum Biswas v. Union of India; Barik Biswas v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed premature writ petitions challenging show cause notice and provisional attachment under the PMLA, emphasizing the availability of efficacious statutory remedies and the need for judicial restraint.
Mohd. Hasmullah v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging acquittal in an alleged firing case due to material contradictions in prosecution evidence and lack of independent corroboration.
Aman Singh v. Sudesh & Ors.
The court allowed the plaintiff's unopposed application to withdraw the suit following settlement, dismissing the suit as withdrawn under Order XXVIII Rule 1 CPC.
Abhisekh Singla v. Rajesh Singla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw a partition suit concerning property bequeathed by will, dismissing the suit as withdrawn due to questions on maintainability.
Subhash Chander Gupta v. North Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order but directed correction of the medical card and acceptance of subscription at the retirement rate.