Delhi High Court

80,866 judgments

Year:

Gaurav Enterprises v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

09 Sep 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7458

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to deposit the required amount belatedly and set aside dismissal of the appeal in default, directing the appeal to be decided on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 deposit order appeal dismissal financial difficulty

M/S. Shresth International v. NCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Sep 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:7459-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award reinstating a workman terminated illegally, clarifying that employer-employee relationship can be presumed when credible evidence is unrebutted and that writ petitions cannot be dismissed solely for non-compliance under Section 17-B of the ID Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant employer-employee relationship illegal termination Section 114(g) Indian Evidence Act Section 17-B Industrial Disputes Act

Siddharth Yadav v. Shri Ram College of Commerce and Anr.

09 Sep 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:7444

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of a student’s election candidature due to insufficient attendance, holding that attendance records are presumed accurate absent any patent error.

constitutional petition_dismissed attendance records student union election judicial review co-curricular activities

Ashok Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

09 Sep 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:7445

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the petitioner for rash and negligent driving causing death, relying on credible eyewitness evidence and the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

criminal appeal_dismissed rash and negligent driving Section 279 IPC Section 304A IPC vehicular accident

Ishak Khan v. Hazrat Ali & Ors.

09 Sep 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:7446

The High Court held that a Magistrate can order registration of an FIR under Section 156(3) CrPC if prima facie cognizable offences are made out, and a revisional court cannot set aside such order merely on rival versions or existence of counter FIRs.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 156(3) CrPC FIR registration criminal complaint cheating

Show World Events v. Jagran Solutions

09 Sep 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:7465

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a valid arbitration agreement between the parties.

other petition_allowed arbitration agreement Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator Consultant Agreement

Residents Welfare Association v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:7488

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging government policy on telecom tower installation, holding that courts cannot interfere with executive policy decisions absent manifest illegality.

administrative petition_dismissed telecom towers policy decision Inter-Ministerial Committee report Standing Committee on Information Technology

Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. Klen & Marshalls Manufacturers and Exporters Ltd.

09 Sep 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:7439-DB

Judgment in appeal FAO(OS) 460/2011 between Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. and Klen & Marshalls Manufacturers and Exporters Ltd. pronounced by Delhi High Court on 09.09.2015.

other other Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Klen & Marshalls Manufacturers and Exporters Ltd. FAO(OS) 460/2011 Delhi High Court

Inder Mohan Arora v. Pawan Kumar Jain

09 Sep 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:7475

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of the petitioner's application to dismiss the plaint for undervaluation, holding that the suit was properly valued at double the earnest money and the court had pecuniary jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Order VII Rule 11 CPC valuation of suit pecuniary jurisdiction earnest money

Rajnish B. Bhatia v. CBI & Ors.

09 Sep 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:7442

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s order for joint trial of two connected question paper leakage cases under Section 219 CrPC, holding that offences committed within twelve months and arising from the same transaction may be tried together without causing prejudice.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant joint trial Section 219 CrPC same transaction question paper leakage

Netrapal v. NCB; Vir Chand Rai v. NCB

09 Sep 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:7441

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for trafficking ganja, holding that procedural compliance under the NDPS Act was met and recovery from the vehicle established possession despite minor procedural lapses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act search and seizure secret information possession of contraband

Sudesh Gulati v. Dr Charanjeet Gandhi & Anr

09 Sep 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:12004

The Delhi High Court dismissed revision petitions challenging eviction proceedings, directing the Rent Controller to decide the eviction petitions expeditiously within one year.

civil appeal_dismissed eviction petition Additional Rent Controller expeditious disposal revision petition

Santosh @ Mota v. State (NCT of Delhi)

09 Sep 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:11961

The Delhi High Court held that a wrapped shaving blade does not qualify as a deadly weapon and modified the appellants' conviction from Section 397 IPC to Section 392 IPC, ordering their release based on time already served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 397 IPC Section 392 IPC deadly weapon use of weapon

Ramadhaar Shah v. State of Delhi; Radhey Shyam Sahni v. State of Delhi

09 Sep 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:11960

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 18(b) of the NDPS Act but modified sentences considering mitigating factors and procedural irregularities.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 18(b) illegal possession sentence modification

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Keihinpanalfa Ltd.

09 Sep 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11433-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld proportionate Transfer Pricing Adjustments and recognized the Assessee's entitlement to royalty payments, dismissing Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Transfer Pricing Adjustment Arm's Length Price Profit Level Indicator Contract Manufacturer

Rakesh v. State of NCT of Delhi

09 Sep 2015 · S. P. Garg · 2015:DHC:10685

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a case involving simple injuries and an amicable settlement, subject to personal bonds and cooperation with investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail amicable settlement simple injuries cross-FIR quashing

Vinnu Goel v. Assotech Ltd

09 Sep 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:7464

The Delhi High Court appointed a substitute arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and directed a 120-day mediation period before arbitration proceedings commence.

civil appeal_allowed Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator substitute arbitrator arbitration agreement

PTC India Limited v. Lanco Power Limited

09 Sep 2015 · Najmi Waziri · 2015:DHC:7496

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that the petitioner waived jurisdictional objections by withdrawing its challenge and participating in arbitration under the Electricity Act, 2003 framework.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration Section 16 Arbitration Act Section 34 Arbitration Act Electricity Act 2003

SHOW WORLD EVENTS v. JAGRAN SOLUTIONS

09 Sep 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:7466

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a valid arbitration agreement between the parties.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 arbitration agreement appointment of arbitrator

Avinash Sharma alias Bholu and Ors v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors

09 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7449

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR under Section 308 IPC on settlement between parties, emphasizing the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences Section 308 IPC