Delhi High Court

80,866 judgments

Year:

Gulab Singh Srivastava v. Safdarjung Hospital

09 Sep 2015 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:7453-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT's order allowing a review petition based on newly discovered documents affecting promotion eligibility.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal review petition finality of order new document

V.K. Kapoor v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

09 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:7491

The Delhi High Court upheld NSIT's decision to charge market rent for accommodation retained beyond one year of Extraordinary Leave, dismissing the petitioner's claims for refund and honorarium.

administrative petition_dismissed Extraordinary Leave House Allotment Rules Market Rent Board of Governors

FAL AVAM SUBZI MANDI MASHAKHOR ASSOCIATION v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI

09 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:7494

The Delhi High Court held that licences for trading agricultural produce within market yards can be limited based on available space and that holding a licence does not confer a right to occupy land, dismissing petitions seeking mandatory grant of licences and protection from eviction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 licensing market yard Ghazipur Subzi Mandi

Puneet Jain & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

09 Sep 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:7492-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial discord following a bona fide settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute mutual consent divorce

Dilip Kumar Goel and Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

09 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2015:DHC:7450

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute settlement

Manjit Kaur & Anr. v. Netra Pal

09 Sep 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:7495

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of leave to defend to tenants in eviction proceedings, holding that bona fide requirement must be an absolute necessity and tenants deserve an opportunity to contest such claims.

property appeal_dismissed bona fide requirement eviction leave to defend landlord-tenant dispute

Ashok Kumar Kharya v. State of NCT of Delhi

09 Sep 2015 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:5795
Cites 1 · Cited by 6

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a supplementary chargesheet filed without prior court permission and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the summoning order against the petitioner accused of criminal breach of trust and cheating in a housing society land fraud case.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant supplementary chargesheet Section 173(8) CrPC fair investigation Article 21 Constitution

Neeraj Yadav v. Subhash Yadav & Ors.

08 Sep 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:7415

The civil suit was dismissed for default and non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and prosecute the case.

civil petition_dismissed default non-prosecution dismissal of suit civil procedure

Sukh Varsha Babbar v. Prem Nath Babbar

08 Sep 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:7405

The Delhi High Court upheld a decree of judicial separation on the ground that false and serious allegations of molestation by the wife and daughter against the husband constituted cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant judicial separation cruelty Hindu Marriage Act false allegations

Darshan Singh & Anr. v. Sat Pal & Anr.

08 Sep 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:7413

The Delhi High Court modified the appellate decree to ensure the respondent's land entitlement including eight shops did not exceed the agreed 33 Bighas and 10 Biswas, affirming the binding nature of compromise and precise land demarcation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compromise land demarcation permanent injunction local commissioner report

Sant Prasad Ojha v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

08 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7412

The Delhi High Court upheld the legality of eviction carried out under a final conviction order under Section 630 of the Companies Act, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the procedure followed and refusal to register an FIR.

criminal petition_dismissed Companies Act 1956 Section 630 Eviction Due process

International Tractors Ltd. v. Punjab Tractors Ltd.

08 Sep 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:7406

The Delhi High Court held that in court-sanctioned amalgamation of companies, the successor company can be substituted under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC in pending suits, and such suits do not abate due to dissolution of the amalgamated company.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amalgamation substitution Order 22 Rule 10 CPC abatement

Ram Singh v. The Management of CPWD

08 Sep 2015 · Gita Mittal; I. S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:7426-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, restoring the Industrial Award directing regularization and payment of back wages to a long-serving daily wager carpenter, holding that Industrial Tribunals have jurisdiction to grant such relief despite non-compliance with recruitment rules under the principles of unfair labour practice.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization industrial dispute daily wager muster roll worker

Sunil Kalra v. Raj Kumar Yadav & Ors.

08 Sep 2015 · Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:7422

The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appellant's appeal for enhancement of compensation in a motor accident claim, affirming the Tribunal's award as just and fair after considering medical expenses and loss of income based on basic pay and allowances.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement medical expenses loss of income

Guddu v. State NCT of Delhi

08 Sep 2015 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2015:DHC:7421

The Delhi High Court acquitted the husband of dowry death charges due to lack of dowry demand evidence but upheld cruelty conviction, while setting aside the sister-in-law's conviction for lack of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC dowry death dowry demand

Shahanwaj Alam v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

08 Sep 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:7425

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping and rape charges, holding that a 17-year-old victim voluntarily accompanied him and was of age of discretion, thus negating offences under Sections 363, 366, and 376 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant kidnapping rape age of consent minor

Sarabjeet Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:7410

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking a last chance to reappear in exams, holding that the petitioner’s grievance was addressed by the institution’s offer of a mercy examination.

other petition_dismissed writ petition mandamus mercy examination incorrect roll number

Ramesh Chawla & Anr v. IDBI Bank Ltd

08 Sep 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:7407-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging DRT and DRAT orders under the SARFAESI Act, affirming the tribunals' authority to regulate repayment and possession proceedings while upholding principles of natural justice.

civil petition_dismissed SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Debts Recovery Tribunal Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal

Rajesh Dhingra v. Central Board of Secondary Education and Anr.

08 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:7408

The Delhi High Court held that CBSE’s notification limiting re-evaluation to ten questions is arbitrary and violative of Article 14, allowing re-evaluation beyond ten questions where gross errors are found.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant re-evaluation CBSE notification Article 14

Kali Charan v. Canara Bank & Ors.

08 Sep 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7399

The Delhi High Court upheld the compulsory retirement penalty on a bank manager for executing a sale deed of mortgaged property without bank permission or clearing dues, rejecting claims of a loan transaction and non-examination of the complainant.

administrative petition_dismissed compulsory retirement mortgaged property sale deed bank permission