Sudesh Gulati v. Dr Charanjeet Gandhi & Anr

Delhi High Court · 09 Sep 2015 · 2015:DHC:12004
V.K. Shali
RC.REV. 480/2015
2015:DHC:12004
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed revision petitions challenging eviction proceedings, directing the Rent Controller to decide the eviction petitions expeditiously within one year.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RC.REV. 480/2015 & CM APPL.18883-84/2015
SUDESH GULATI Petitioner
Through: Ms. Anita Sahani, Advocatewith Mr. Shivom Garg, Adv. &
Ms. Seema Saini, Adv.
VERSUS
DR CHARANJEET GANDHI & ANR Respondents
Through:
RC.REV. 483/2015 & CM APPL. 18891-92/2015
SUDESH GULATI ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Anita Sahani,Advocate with Mr. Shivom Garg, Adv. &
Ms. Seema Saini, Adv.
VERSUS
PARVINDER SINGH ..... Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K SHALI
09.09.2015
ORDER

1. After brief submission, the learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly states that she is not pressing the present revision petitions in case a direction is given to the learned Additional Rent Controller (ARC) for expeditious disposal ofthe petition.

2. Having regard to the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, both the petitions are dismissed as not pressed. However, it is expected that the learned ARC shall decide the eviction petitions as 2015:DHC:12004 expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of oneyear.

3. With these directions both the revision petitions stand disposed of.

4. Pending applications also stand disposed of.

5. Copy of the order be given Dasti to the learned counsel for the petitioner. A copy of the order be also sent to the learned ARC for information.

SEPTEMBER 09, 2015 vk C-T V.K. SHALI, J.