Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
Indian Railway Finance Corporation Ltd. v. Yatender Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld reinstatement and back wages for a worker found to be directly employed despite sham contracts but set aside directions for regularization absent proof of available posts and eligibility.
Indian Railway Finance Corporation Ltd. v. Yatender Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld reinstatement and back wages for employees found to be directly employed by IRFC despite sham contracts with agents, but set aside directions for their regularization in line with Supreme Court precedents.
Babu Lal v. Mukesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the landlord's revision petition, holding that leave to defend must be granted when the tenant raises triable issues regarding bona fide requirement and alternate accommodation in eviction proceedings.
Haider Ali v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, holding that mere presence without shared common intention is insufficient for joint liability.
Lokesh Goyal & Ors. v. Saksham Goyal
The Delhi High Court disposed of two civil suits concerning property disputes on the basis of a mutually agreed and binding Settlement Agreement reached through mediation.
B.S. Oberoi v. P.S. Oberoi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application to challenge a sale deed after limitation expired, holding that such amendment does not introduce a new cause of action and is necessary for effective adjudication.
Mohd Rozwan and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR under Section 308 IPC based on compromise between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Dhani Ram @ Raju @ Bhedia v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the police externment order against the petitioner for lack of credible material and failure to consider relevant factors, emphasizing the need to balance police powers with individual rights.
Kesari Nandan Kaushik LR v. Shri Sirikishan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate decrees recognizing the plaintiff's ownership and landlord-tenant relationship, entitling him to possession and mesne profits against the defendant.
Kesari Nandan Kaushik LR v. Sirikishan & Ors.
The High Court upheld the appellate court's finding that the plaintiff was the owner and landlord of the suit property, established an oral tenancy, and granted possession and mesne profits against the defendant whose ownership claim was unproven.
J.K. Mittal v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that threat perception and grant of police security is an executive function not subject to judicial direction unless arbitrary, and directed the police to assess the petitioner's threat within one month with interim protection.
Glossy Color & Paints Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Mona Aggarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using the deceptively similar "6004" mark and label infringing plaintiffs' registered "1001" trademark and label, recognizing passing off and trademark infringement.
DTC v. Mohar Singh
The Delhi High Court set aside the Labour Court's reinstatement order holding that the respondent failed to prove continuous service of 240 days required for retrenchment protections under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act and that the delay and superannuation rendered the relief infructuous.
Klen & Marshalls Manufacturers and Exporters Ltd. v. Power Grid Corporation India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a party can invoke a performance guarantee independently of liquidated damages under contract terms, and limited judicial interference with arbitral awards to cases of patent illegality.
Inderjeet v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a constable’s appointment by SSB on medical grounds without a formal enquiry, holding that termination based on medical disqualification is not stigmatic and does not require enquiry.
Rajeev Saumitra v. Neetu Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw a suit with liberty to file a fresh suit due to technical defects, clarifying the scope of Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC regarding withdrawal and fresh filing.
Sumit v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the husband accused under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC upon an amicable matrimonial settlement and compliance with monetary terms.
Dan Bahadur & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
A.K Singhal v. Sanjeev Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition and refused condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and upheld the trial court's dismissal of the eviction petition on merits.
SHOW WORLD EVENTS v. JAGRAN SOLUTIONS
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a valid arbitration agreement between the parties.