Delhi High Court

77,325 judgments

Year:

Rajiv Anhal v. MCD & Anr.

30 Sep 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:8218

The Delhi High Court upheld the removal from service of a cashier after a fair departmental inquiry despite procedural objections, emphasizing practical application of natural justice and proportionality of penalty.

labor petition_dismissed Significant departmental inquiry removal from service natural justice defence assistant

UCO Bank v. Anita & Anr

30 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:8221

The Delhi High Court condoned delay in deposit of decretal amount and varied the decree to reduce interest on mesne profits from 12% to 9% per annum by mutual consent, disposing of the appeal accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed mesne profits interest rate condonation of delay Fixed Deposit Receipt

Rajesh Arora v. Rakesh Malhotra

30 Sep 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:8226

The plaintiff was permitted to withdraw the civil suit after mediation failed and no deposit was made, resulting in dismissal of the suit as withdrawn.

civil appeal_dismissed withdrawal of suit mediation failure dismissal as withdrawn leave to withdraw

Delhi Development Authority v. Corporation Bank & Anr

30 Sep 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:8233-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the DDA's writ petition challenging recovery proceedings and sale of mortgaged property without prior permission, directing status quo in line with the Supreme Court's order and leaving substantive rights open for adjudication in appropriate forums.

civil petition_dismissed Procedural Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 mortgage without permission lease terms Debts Recovery Tribunal

K.R. Chitra v. Supreme Court Legal Services Committee & Anr

30 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:8229

The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee has absolute discretion in empanelling Advocates and is not obliged to communicate reasons for non-selection, dismissing the petition challenging non-empanelment.

administrative petition_dismissed empanelment Supreme Court Legal Services Committee Advocate on Record discretion of client

Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation

30 Sep 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:8231

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking refund of forfeited earnest money and security deposit, holding that disputed factual issues preclude exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed Article 226 writ jurisdiction forfeiture earnest money

TVC SKY SHOP & Anr. v. M/S GTM TELESHOPPING P. LTD and Ors.

30 Sep 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:8225

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' civil suit for default and non-prosecution due to their failure to appear and prosecute the case despite repeated court directions.

civil appeal_dismissed default non-prosecution dismissal of suit plaintiffs' failure to appear

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sea Shell Marketing Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

30 Sep 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:8984

The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of private respondents from prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC due to lack of prima facie evidence of conspiracy with public officials in unauthorized construction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Unauthorized construction Municipal Corporation of Delhi Criminal conspiracy

Prem Chandjain v. Umar Daraz

29 Sep 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:12022

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions concerning possession as not pressed after the respondent-landlord retrieved possession of the premises.

civil appeal_dismissed possession landlord petition dismissed retrieval of possession

PRO COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. VIJAY CONDUCTORS INDIA PVT. LTD.

29 Sep 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11768-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions under Section 68 in the hands of conduit entities, affirming that taxation must be in the hands of the ultimate beneficiaries and entry provider as per binding Settlement Commission and Additional CIT orders.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act Accommodation entries Settlement Commission Conduit entities

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-2) v. M/s Mevron Projects Pvt. Ltd.

29 Sep 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11448-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that an income tax assessment under Section 153C against an entity that ceased to exist due to amalgamation at the time of assessment is invalid and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153C Income Tax Act Amalgamation Assessment validity Non-existent entity

THE HOME LIVING COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS v. THE REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS

29 Sep 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:11409-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Financial Commissioner's order appointing an Administrator and directed appointment of a retired judge as an independent observer to oversee fair elections in a cooperative society.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 Section 39 Administrator appointment Independent observer

Amit v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

29 Sep 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:10699

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of rape and criminal intimidation, emphasizing their cooperation with investigation and prior relationship with the prosecutrix.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC

Inder Singh Alias Indal v. State and Anr.

29 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8151

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 452, 323, and 506(2) IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC despite the offences being non-compoundable.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences settlement

Pawan Kumar Singhal v. Ram Avtar Singhal

29 Sep 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:8179

The Delhi High Court decreed a partition suit based on a voluntary settlement agreement reached through mediation, recording the settlement as a decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed settlement agreement mediation partition suit Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC

Shoppers Stop Ltd v. Shoppers Shop

29 Sep 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:8182

The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark dispute suit based on a voluntary settlement reached through court-annexed mediation and allowed refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

civil appeal_allowed settlement agreement court-annexed mediation trademark dispute Section 16 Court Fees Act

Richa Bharti alias Kajal v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

29 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2015:DHC:8156

The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of accused from Sections 498A and 406 IPC charges due to lack of specific allegations of cruelty and entrustment, emphasizing the need for definite nexus and particulars in dowry harassment cases.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 498A IPC cruelty dowry demand Section 406 IPC

Ankur Sabharwal and Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

29 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8155

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on a genuine settlement between parties, emphasizing the court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes non-compoundable offences

Lakhan and Ors v. State and Anr

29 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8154

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes non-compoundable offences

Aman Mendiratta & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

29 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8163

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR under Section 365 IPC on the basis of a compromise between parties, emphasizing the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 365 IPC