Delhi High Court

77,325 judgments

Year:

Malla Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences and Anr v. Union of India and Anr

29 Sep 2015 · G. Rohini; Jayant Nath; V. Kameswar Rao

The Court held that medical colleges must be given a reasonable opportunity to rectify deficiencies and be heard under Section 10-A of the Medical Council Act before renewal permission is denied, and that provisos excluding such opportunity are inconsistent with the statute.

administrative other Significant Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 10-A Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999 Regulation 8(3)(1)

Kailash Chand v. Ganesh

29 Sep 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:8148-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld specific performance of a 2004 agreement to sell immovable property, holding that readiness and willingness include actual preparedness beyond mere mental intent, and allowed additional compensation for delay-related property value rise.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness agreement to sell Delhi Land (Restrictions on Transfer) Act, 1972

Dr. Puran Chand Dharmarth Trust v. Union of India

29 Sep 2015 · Chief Justice; Jayant Nath · 2015:DHC:8147-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the disapproval of a medical college scheme, emphasizing adherence to the statutory schedule and noting the withdrawal of the impugned recommendation by the Central Government.

administrative petition_dismissed Medical College Establishment Medical Council of India Regulation 8(3)(1)(d) Indian Medical Council Act, 1956

Sunil Sikri v. The Management Committee of Guru Harkishan Public School & Ors.

29 Sep 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:8145-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the continuation of disciplinary proceedings against a reinstated teacher, ruling that delay and minority status do not bar enquiry under the Delhi School Education Act and Rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary enquiry delay in enquiry Delhi School Education Act and Rules, 1973 minority unaided school

Susheel Kumar Khanna v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

29 Sep 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:8174-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings pending for over five years without possession or compensation under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act Land Acquisition Act 1894 lapse of acquisition proceedings physical possession

Ajit Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

29 Sep 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:8176-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years from the award date, regardless of physical possession.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act Land Acquisition Act 1894 lapse of acquisition proceedings compensation unpaid

Nitin Garg v. M/S Saraswati Steel & Ors.

29 Sep 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:8183

The Delhi High Court decreed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of outstanding principal and agreed interest on delayed payments against defendants who failed to pay despite repeated demands and legal notice.

civil appeal_allowed recovery of money contractual interest delayed payment pendent lite interest

Anil Kumar & Ors. v. The Management of M/S Richa and Company

29 Sep 2015 · Sunita Gupta · 2015:DHC:8177

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 for illegally terminated workmen, emphasizing just and adequate relief in lieu of reinstatement under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F illegal termination compensation enhancement

Rehabilitation Ministry Employees Co-Operative House Building Society v. Ramjas Yadav & Ors.

29 Sep 2015 · Sunita Gupta · 2015:DHC:8175

The Delhi High Court held that claims for non-payment of wages without dispute as to wage rates cannot be entertained under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act, and the competent authority lacked jurisdiction to decide such claims.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 20(1) jurisdiction no work no pay

Saroj v. Charan Singh and Anr

29 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8144

The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted to a 70-year-old accused in a murder case, emphasizing the need to consider all bail factors and rejecting the petition for cancellation absent material evidence of violation or risk to justice.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail murder Sections 302/34 IPC witness tampering

Anuj Sharma v. Chanchal Verma

29 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8150

The Delhi High Court upheld the maintenance and rental allowance awarded under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, based on the petitioner’s actual income and the respondent’s right to live at the same standard.

family petition_dismissed Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 interim maintenance rental allowance income assessment

Rajkumar Pandey v. Additional Commissioner of Police & Anr.

29 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:8186

The Delhi High Court upheld the Licensing Authority's discretion to reject an arms license application absent specific threat, holding that no legal right exists to such a license based on subjective threat perception and limiting judicial review to arbitrariness.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant arms license Arms Act 1959 licensing authority discretion perception of threat

Ankur Aggarwal v. State

29 Sep 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:8185-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a neighbourly altercation over parking space following an amicable settlement and mutual agreement not to prosecute.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement cross FIRs memorandum of understanding

Ankur Aggarwal v. State

29 Sep 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:8184-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a neighborly altercation over parking space following an amicable settlement between the parties, subject to payment to the Police Welfare Fund.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR cross FIRs amicable settlement memorandum of understanding

Moser Baer India Ltd v. Sanjay Jain & Ors.

29 Sep 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:8180

The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit based on a voluntary settlement reached through mediation and allowed refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

civil appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Court Annexed Mediation Section 16 Court Fees Act Refund of Court Fees

Chirag Stock and Securities Pvt. Limited v. Union of India & Anr.

29 Sep 2015 · J.R. Midha · 2016:DHC:8321

The Delhi High Court issued procedural orders in an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Chirag Stock and Securities Pvt. Limited against Union of India, with no substantive decision recorded in the provided text.

civil other Procedural Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator arbitration petition

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-2) v. Aqua Guard Marketing Pvt. Ltd

28 Sep 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11447-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed income tax appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against Aqua Guard Marketing Pvt. Ltd., relying on a prior ruling to uphold the assessments.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Appeal Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Aqua Guard Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Doctrine of Precedent

SHRI VIMAL JETHA v. M/S PRAVEER CONSTRUCTIONS P. LTD

28 Sep 2015 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2015:DHC:8119

The Delhi High Court decreed a summary suit for recovery of money based on admitted liability under a settlement agreement and dishonored cheques, dismissing the defendant's leave to defend application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC summary suit Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act

Pardeep Kumar Agarwal & Ors. v. State & Ors.

28 Sep 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:8127

The Delhi High Court granted letters of administration to petitioners based on a valid Will executed by the deceased, allowing property succession as per the Will after respondents failed to contest.

property petition_allowed Indian Succession Act Section 278 letters of administration valid Will

Neerja Bhargava v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

28 Sep 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:8118

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. due to inordinate delay and failure to avail the statutory remedy of revision within the prescribed period.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. inherent powers quashing of FIR revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C.