Full Text
Translation output
$-43 & 44 (common order)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RC.REV. 398/2015 & CM APPL.13941/2015
PREM CHANDJAIN (NOW DECEASED) Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.D. Ansari, Advocate with Mr. I. Ahmed, Advocate
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RC.REV. 398/2015 & CM APPL.13941/2015
PREM CHANDJAIN (NOW DECEASED) Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.D. Ansari, Advocate with Mr. I. Ahmed, Advocate
VERSUS
UMAR DARAZ & ORS Respondent
Through: •Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Advocate
Through: •Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Advocate
RC.REV. 402/2015 & CM APPL.14023-14024/2015
PREM CHAND (NOW DECEASED) THROUH HIS LRS VIJAY
KUMAR & ORS Petitioners
Through: Mr. S.D. Ansari, Advocate with Mr. I. Ahmed, Advocate
PREM CHAND (NOW DECEASED) THROUH HIS LRS VIJAY
KUMAR & ORS Petitioners
Through: Mr. S.D. Ansari, Advocate with Mr. I. Ahmed, Advocate
VERSUS
UMAR DARAZ& ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Advocate
Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
29.09.2015
29.09.2015
ORDER
1. After briefsubmission,,the learned counsel for the petitioner does not press his petition as the possession ofthe premises has already been retrieved bythe respondent-landlord.
2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, both the petitions are dismissed as not pressed.
3. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 vk V.K. SHALI, J