Delhi High Court
34,294 judgments
Raj Kumar v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary orders against the petitioner for misappropriation, holding the petition barred by delay and rejecting the claim for parity in penalty with other officers due to materially different culpability.
Sandeep Dahiya v. Poorna Prajna Public School & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a teacher appointed under the Delhi School Education Act cannot be validly transferred outside Delhi, as it deprives statutory protections, and such transfer orders are liable to be quashed under writ jurisdiction.
Keshav Dutt Sharma & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings in the interest of justice.
Yogesh Kumar & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable family settlement, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process of law under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Jaspal Singh & Ors. v. The State Gov NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Pramod Bind & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a bona fide settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing prevention of abuse of process of law.
Munish Grover v. Container Corporation of India Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a transfer order, holding that transfers in transferable posts are valid absent mala-fides or breach of transfer policy, and personal grievances do not amount to whistleblower complaints.
Sahib Dayal Goel & Ors. v. Prem Dayal Goel
The Delhi High Court dismissed the partition suit based on intestate succession in presence of a valid Will admitted by heirs, and rejected the claim for movable estate partition for lack of particulars and limitation.
National Seeds Corporation Ltd v. Cost To Cost Computers & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order appointing a Local Commissioner to measure leased premises to resolve rent and mesne profits disputes despite a decree of possession.
M/S Kanhiya Lal Prakash Kumar v. M/S AJM Housing Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the landowner is not a necessary party in a landlord-tenant possession suit where the tenant admits tenancy and no relief is sought against the landowner, dismissing the petition for impleadment of DDA.
DELHI TRANSCO LTD v. KEC INTERNATIONAL LTD
Delhi High Court allowed appeal to set aside arbitral award portions based on unauthenticated Chartered Accountant certificates due to lack of evidence, while upholding other claims and arbitration costs.
A v. S
The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to expedite disposal of pending miscellaneous applications with cooperation from both parties.
Mohit Vats @ Tittoo v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner accused of dowry death and murder, holding that active conspiracy and attempts to conceal the crime preclude bail.
Malkit Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner due to his evasive conduct, non-cooperation in investigation, and prior criminal history in a case involving alleged immigration fraud.
Honey Tyagi @ Nishant Bhardwaj v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application in a gang-related murder case, holding that serious charges and absconding status precluded bail despite co-accused being granted bail.
Gomati alias Manoj v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted parole to a life-convict petitioner, emphasizing parole as a rehabilitative measure and directing consideration of the prisoner’s entire conduct including subsequent compliance despite past parole violations.
Manjeet v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a life-convict who had previously breached emergency parole, emphasizing the rehabilitative objectives of parole and the need for reasonable discretion in granting it.
Shashi Prabhakar Das v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a CISF probationer on medical grounds, affirming limited judicial interference in expert medical fitness assessments under CISF Rules.
Krishma & Ors. v. Mohan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the motor accident compensation award, holding that pain and suffering compensation is not applicable in death cases and affirming inclusion of 40% future prospects and skilled worker wages in the award.
M/S SIMBA SHOPPING PVT LTD & ORS. v. AERO CLUB
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's jurisdiction based on an exclusive jurisdiction clause and part cause of action arising in Delhi, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to territorial jurisdiction.