Tinku Babu & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 21 May 2025 · 2025:DHC:4199-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul
W.P.(C) 6928/2025
2025:DHC:4199-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court directed the Appellate Authority to decide the petitioners' pending appeals with a reasoned order within four weeks, dismissing the writ petition without prejudice to further challenge.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 6928/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 6928/2025 & CM APPL. 31378/2025
TINKU BABU & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Rhea Verma and Ms. Kavita Chaturwedi, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Vinay Yadav, SPC
WITH
Mr. Servesh P. Srivastva, GP, Mr. Ansh Kalra, Ms. Kamna Behrani and
Mr. Divyanshu Sinha, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL)
21.05.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. Against the orders of dismissal of the petitioners, it is an acknowledged position that the appeals filed by the petitioners are pending before the Appellate Authority.

2. We dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Appellate Authority to consider the averments in the present writ petition along with the contentions in the appeals filed before it by the petitioners against their orders of dismissal and pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within a period four weeks from today. W.P.(C) 6928/2025

3. The decision, as and when taken, would be communicated to the petitioners.

4. Needless to say, the petitioners’ rights to challenge the decision, if adverse to them, shall stand reserved.

5. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. MAY 21, 2025 Click here to check corrigendum, if any