Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Keshav Dutt Sharma & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

21 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:4128

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings in the interest of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS 2023 Section 498A IPC amicable settlement

Yogesh Kumar & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

21 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:4129

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable family settlement, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process of law under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC family settlement

Jaspal Singh & Ors. v. The State Gov NCT of Delhi & Anr.

21 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:4132

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS 2023 Section 498A IPC amicable settlement

Pramod Bind & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

21 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:4150

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a bona fide settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing prevention of abuse of process of law.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Munish Grover v. Container Corporation of India Ltd. and Ors.

21 May 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:4219

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a transfer order, holding that transfers in transferable posts are valid absent mala-fides or breach of transfer policy, and personal grievances do not amount to whistleblower complaints.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer order transferable post mala-fides whistleblower protection

Sahib Dayal Goel & Ors. v. Prem Dayal Goel

21 May 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:4231

The Delhi High Court dismissed the partition suit based on intestate succession in presence of a valid Will admitted by heirs, and rejected the claim for movable estate partition for lack of particulars and limitation.

civil petition_dismissed partition suit intestate succession testamentary succession valid Will

National Seeds Corporation Ltd v. Cost To Cost Computers & Anr.

21 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4273

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order appointing a Local Commissioner to measure leased premises to resolve rent and mesne profits disputes despite a decree of possession.

civil petition_dismissed Local Commissioner Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC lease dispute mesne profits

M/S Kanhiya Lal Prakash Kumar v. M/S AJM Housing Pvt. Ltd.

21 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4274

The Delhi High Court held that the landowner is not a necessary party in a landlord-tenant possession suit where the tenant admits tenancy and no relief is sought against the landowner, dismissing the petition for impleadment of DDA.

civil petition_dismissed necessary party Order 1 Rule 10 CPC landlord-tenant relationship possession suit

DELHI TRANSCO LTD v. KEC INTERNATIONAL LTD

21 May 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:4070-DB

Delhi High Court allowed appeal to set aside arbitral award portions based on unauthenticated Chartered Accountant certificates due to lack of evidence, while upholding other claims and arbitration costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 37 Arbitral Award Chartered Accountant Certificates

A v. S

21 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4280

The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to expedite disposal of pending miscellaneous applications with cooperation from both parties.

family other expeditious disposal Family Court miscellaneous applications judicial directions

Mohit Vats @ Tittoo v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

20 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4205

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner accused of dowry death and murder, holding that active conspiracy and attempts to conceal the crime preclude bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail dowry death Section 498A IPC Section 304B IPC

Malkit Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi

20 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4192

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner due to his evasive conduct, non-cooperation in investigation, and prior criminal history in a case involving alleged immigration fraud.

criminal petition_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 482 BNSS Section 419 IPC Section 420 IPC

Honey Tyagi @ Nishant Bhardwaj v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

20 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4195

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application in a gang-related murder case, holding that serious charges and absconding status precluded bail despite co-accused being granted bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed regular bail proclaimed offender conspiracy to murder gang rivalry

Gomati alias Manoj v. State of NCT of Delhi

20 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4169

The Delhi High Court granted parole to a life-convict petitioner, emphasizing parole as a rehabilitative measure and directing consideration of the prisoner’s entire conduct including subsequent compliance despite past parole violations.

criminal petition_allowed Significant parole furlough life imprisonment Delhi Prison Rules

Manjeet v. State NCT of Delhi

20 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4162

The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a life-convict who had previously breached emergency parole, emphasizing the rehabilitative objectives of parole and the need for reasonable discretion in granting it.

criminal petition_allowed Significant parole Section 302 IPC Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 Delhi Prison Rules 2018

Shashi Prabhakar Das v. Union of India

20 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4066-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a CISF probationer on medical grounds, affirming limited judicial interference in expert medical fitness assessments under CISF Rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant probationer termination medical fitness CISF Rules 2001 Dysarthria

Krishma & Ors. v. Mohan & Ors.

20 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4941

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the motor accident compensation award, holding that pain and suffering compensation is not applicable in death cases and affirming inclusion of 40% future prospects and skilled worker wages in the award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation pain and suffering future prospects

M/S SIMBA SHOPPING PVT LTD & ORS. v. AERO CLUB

20 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4939

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's jurisdiction based on an exclusive jurisdiction clause and part cause of action arising in Delhi, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to territorial jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction exclusive jurisdiction clause cause of action Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. April USA Assistance Inc

20 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4296-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award interpreting 'annual audited premium' as standard premium rates and allowed condonation of delay due to Covid, dismissing the appellant's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge contract interpretation annual audited premium

AECOM Intercontinental Holdings UK Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer Ward Int Tax 1(1)(1), Delhi & Ors.

20 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4118-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that cross charges for corporate management services do not constitute fees for technical services under the India-UK DTAA and directed issuance of a 'nil' withholding tax certificate.

tax petition_allowed Significant fees for technical services make available clause India-UK DTAA Section 197 Income Tax Act