Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Sudesh Rani v. Usha Rani Deceased Through LRs & Ors.
The High Court allowed the petitioner to lead rebuttal evidence on the genuineness of disputed signatures after the Trial Court wrongly refused such opportunity, ensuring fair trial in a suit for specific performance.
Shilpa Gupta v. Ashok Kansal
The High Court held that a trial court cannot prematurely close a plaintiff's right to lead evidence when an application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC is pending and must decide the application before denying evidence.
Amit Kumar v. Kamaljeet Dogra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition challenging an impleadment order.
M/S COSMIC ORANGE INFRAVENTURES PVT. LTD. v. L. SUBRAMAINAM & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that the NCDRC must issue notice to the opposite party before condoning delay and restoring a dismissed consumer complaint to prevent prejudice and uphold natural justice.
Sh Bhagwat Singh v. New India Assurance Company Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court held it lacked jurisdiction under Article 227 to hear a petition when the cause of action arose outside its territory, allowing withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
Mahender v. Pushpender Sharma & Ors.
The High Court upheld the Executing Court’s order directing auction of partitioned property after the Decree-Holder refused the Judgment Debtor’s offer to purchase their share, emphasizing compliance with Supreme Court timelines for execution.
M/S MHJ METALTECHS PRIVATE LIMITED v. CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DELHI SOUTH
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging GST demand orders for fraudulent ITC, directing petitioners to pursue statutory appeals under the CGST Act.
Tarun Kumar Katyal v. Vikas Katyal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court decreed a partition suit in terms of a lawful settlement agreement reached through mediation, confirming the binding effect of such agreements under Order XXXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi III v. M/S Globe Civil Projects Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Service Tax's appeal against a CESTAT order on maintainability grounds, holding that such appeals lie only before the Supreme Court under the Central Excise Act.
Chirag Garg v. Commissioner State Tax, Delhi GST
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte tax demand order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after the petitioner deposited part of the tax and was given an opportunity to file a reply.
Union of India v. M/s Agrawal and Co.
Limitation for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the A&C Act begins only upon receipt of the final award after the correction period, not from provisional communication.
Pandey Traders v. Chauhan Water Supplier
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decree for recovery of ₹34,87,947/- with interest in a commercial dispute involving investment in sand mining projects, holding that defendants failed to prove transfer of funds to a third party at plaintiff's instance.
Kalia Gupta & Ors. v. Guddu Gupta, Trading as M/S Leela Cosmetics
The Delhi High Court dismissed the civil appeal as withdrawn at the appellant's request without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Suresh Yadav v. G.N.C.T of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's dismissal and remanding the disciplinary matter for fresh consideration in light of the petitioner's acquittal in the related criminal case.
Scientific Engineering House Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of the petitioner's bid in a defence procurement tender, emphasizing limited judicial interference in such sensitive contracts, especially where delay has caused vested rights to accrue.
Connect Residuary Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner Delhi Goods and Services Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to non-visibility of the show cause notice on the portal, remanding the matter for fresh hearing while leaving the validity of related notifications to the Supreme Court.
Anita v. Puran Singh
Revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, as affirmed by the Delhi High Court following Supreme Court precedents.
P.C. Agrawal v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of orders refusing FIR registration in a property dispute, holding that the allegations primarily involve civil matters and do not warrant criminal investigation.
Ram Kripal Singh Construction Pvt Ltd v. Indian Oil Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by a contractor seeking to restrain Indian Oil Corporation from completing works at the contractor's risk and cost, holding that the petition was premature, speculative, and involved disputed contractual facts unsuitable for writ relief.
Aman Singh @ Aman Thakur v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Anticipatory bail granted in a sexual offence case involving disputed age and delayed FIR, subject to cooperation with investigation and non-contact with witnesses.