Delhi High Court
33,049 judgments
Mohd Yamin v. Mohd Hasam
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to reject a suit for injunction based on wrongful possession despite absence of a specific declaration prayer, emphasizing that cause of action must be judged on the plaint's averments without evidence at the threshold.
Vinay Dua v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Raj Kumar Agarwal v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that disclosure statements of co-accused require corroboration and mere financial or communication links do not bar bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Ravinder Bhuiyan v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused charged under Section 18 of the NDPS Act involving commercial quantity of narcotics, emphasizing that prolonged incarceration and procedural lapses in recovery justify bail despite statutory restrictions.
Jogi Anil Kumar v. Indian Coast Guard
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the Indian Coast Guard to permit the petitioner to participate in Stage II of recruitment despite procedural lapse in uploading the examination center, emphasizing fairness and non-arbitrariness.
Vikram Yadav v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the Sentence Review Board to reconsider the premature release of a life convict with proper application of mind and adherence to the 2004 policy, emphasizing reformative justice over mechanical rejection.
Pawan Kumar v. Harnarain Dass Charitable Trust
The Delhi High Court dismissed tenants' stay applications against eviction orders, holding that the revisional jurisdiction is limited to supervisory review and that the eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act was lawful and bona fide.
Ramky Infrastructure Limited and ECI Engineering Construction Company Limited (JV) v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that interim reliefs under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act should be sought before the arbitral tribunal once constituted and declined to grant such reliefs at the court stage.
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Bal Mukund and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's criminal leave petition challenging acquittal due to contradictions and lack of corroboration in prosecution evidence and refused to condone delay in filing.
Manoj Saw v. Ramneek Sabarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident appeal by reducing contributory negligence to 10%, upholding functional disability at 17%, and directing 25% addition for future prospects in compensation.
Barun Bhanot v. M/S Annie Imexpo Marketing Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case due to invalid legal demand notice and successful rebuttal of statutory presumption by the accused.
Lovee Narula v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted interim bail on humanitarian grounds to an accused under PMLA to attend to his critically ill mother, subject to stringent conditions to safeguard the trial process.
GMR Power and Urban Infra Limited v. Gajlaxmi Urban Infratech Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted a twelve-month extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing completion of arbitration proceedings at an advanced stage with parties' consent.
Shailender Singh @ Sonu v. State, NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's plea for further extension of interim bail on medical grounds due to fabricated medical documents and directed surrender within a specified period.
KAIROSOFT AI SOLUTIONS LIMITED v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the cause of action arose in Mumbai where BSE issued impugned notices placing petitioners' shares under surveillance.
GMR POCHANPALLI EXPESSWAYS LIMITED v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court allowed a 12-month extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, considering pending appeals and ongoing conciliation.
Reliance Eminent Trading and Commercial Private Limited v. Delhi Development Authority
Summary judgment was refused in a suit for refund of sale consideration for a plot where disputed issues of possession and title required trial and the plaintiff had not offered or established return of possession.
Vedpal Singh Tanwar v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Vedpal Singh Tanwar in a money laundering case linked to illegal mining, holding that the mandatory twin conditions under Section 45 of the PML Act were not satisfied and medical grounds were insufficient for bail.
Hindustan Hydraulics Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award upholding rejection of a machine due to admitted design deviations and held that reasonable contract interpretation by the tribunal and minor errors do not warrant setting aside the award under Section 34.
Bharat Kumar Ahluwalia v. Achla Chaudhary & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that in a partition suit among co-owners, where joint or constructive possession is pleaded without specific averment of ouster, only fixed court fee is payable and the plaint cannot be rejected for deficient court fee.
Talib v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an accused in an armed robbery case, emphasizing parity with a co-accused already on bail and the trial stage with witnesses examined.