Delhi High Court

33,049 judgments

Year:

R.K. Jain v. Suraj Sunar & Ors.

25 Jun 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:5010
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a suit for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that jurisdiction lies where the defendant resides or cause of action arises, not where the plaintiff resides.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction Section 20 CPC cause of action plaintiff residence

Ashwani Kumar v. Union of India

25 Jun 2025 · Manoj Jain; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5021

The Delhi High Court directed a further binding medical examination for a CDS candidate declared unfit due to spinal condition, emphasizing consideration of authoritative medical opinions.

administrative other Significant medical fitness Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra Indian Air Force recruitment Appellate Medical Board

Rasiklal Mohanlal Gangani v. State

23 Jun 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:5003

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 420 IPC against the petitioner, holding that the allegations disclosed no prima facie offence and the dispute was essentially civil in nature.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC Section 482 CrPC inherent jurisdiction quashing of criminal proceedings

Prem Shankar Raju v. State of NCT of Delhi

23 Jun 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:5002
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for rape and penetrative sexual assault of a minor, affirming that consent of a minor is irrelevant and victim’s credible testimony supported by DNA evidence suffices for conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sexual assault minor victim POCSO Act Section 376(2)(i) IPC

Kishan Chand v. Bhagat Ram

23 Jun 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:5001
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the respondent failed to establish unlawful dispossession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Specific Relief Act Section 6 unlawful dispossession Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action

Potanna Chinanna Abulkod v. Union of India

23 Jun 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5354-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner’s representation was disposed of, granting liberty to challenge the decision in accordance with law.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition representation disposal liberty to challenge Director General Border Roads

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. RAJESH

19 Jun 2025 · AMIT MAHAJAN · 2025:DHC:4997

The Delhi High Court partly allowed cross-appeals in a motor accident claim, directing reassessment of victim's income and disability for compensation recalculation, while upholding other awards.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant Motor Accident Claims Tribunal compensation loss of future income functional disability

Manish Garg & Anr. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd & Anr.

19 Jun 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4995

The Delhi High Court allowed additional evidence and held that absence of endorsement on the driver's license does not justify insurer's recovery rights when the vehicle was not carrying hazardous goods and the driver had requisite training.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XLI Rule 27 CPC additional evidence motor accident claim hazardous goods

Sunita Gupta v. State & Anr

19 Jun 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4998
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal under Section 509 IPC, ruling that inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and lack of specific proof of criminal intent warranted benefit of doubt to the accused, while affirming the victim's statutory right to appeal under Section 372 CrPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 509 IPC Section 372 CrPC appeal against acquittal victim's right to appeal

Jagadish Das v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 Jun 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:4999
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to a proclaimed offender accused of misappropriating gold in a serious economic offence, reaffirming that proclaimed persons are ordinarily not entitled to anticipatory bail except in exceptional cases.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 82 Cr.P.C. proclaimed offender economic offences

Shri Ram General Insurance Company Limited v. Hans Raj Yadav

19 Jun 2025 · Amit Mahajan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld most of the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim, rejected contributory negligence for not wearing a helmet, applied the multiplier system for attendant charges, disallowed pension deduction from income, enhanced loss of amenities compensation, and increased interest rate to 9% per annum.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation contributory negligence multiplier system

Pradeep Bailey v. Gilma Daniel

18 Jun 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:4993

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file additional documents belatedly under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC, emphasizing that procedural rules should not obstruct substantive justice when no prejudice is caused.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 7 Rule 14 CPC additional documents leave of court substantive justice

Pradeep Bailey v. Gilma Daniel

18 Jun 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:4992

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file additional documents belatedly under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC, emphasizing that procedural rules should not override substantive justice when no prejudice is caused.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 7 Rule 14 CPC additional documents leave of court substantive justice

State of NCT of Delhi v. Neeraj Kumar @Sunil

17 Jun 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4988
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against bail granted under MCOCA, holding that despite imperfect application of statutory bail conditions, prolonged incarceration and trial delay justified bail under Article 21.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail MCOCA Section 21(4) prolonged incarceration

State of NCT of Delhi v. Satish Kumar Mandal

17 Jun 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4989

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal in a POCSO case due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant POCSO Act Section 378 CrPC leave to appeal acquittal

State NCT of Delhi v. Umesh Sharma

17 Jun 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4991
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal under Section 489C IPC, holding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case due to contradictions and lack of evidence of intent to use counterfeit currency as genuine.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 489C IPC counterfeit currency mens rea leave to appeal

Kuber Boddh v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

17 Jun 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4987
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application under Section 319 CrPC for summoning an additional accused due to lack of strong and cogent evidence, emphasizing the discretionary and stringent nature of such power.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning additional accused discretionary power strong and cogent evidence

State GNCT Delhi v. Shiv Mohan

17 Jun 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4990

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal in a sexual assault case due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and unexplained delay in FIR registration.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 378 CrPC leave to appeal acquittal sexual assault

Chaman Lal v. Union of India

17 Jun 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5283-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to reconsider a transfer order challenged on medical and family grounds by passing a reasoned order, granting interim relief to the petitioner.

administrative other transfer order reasoned order administrative decision medical grounds

Dr Aditi Panwar v. National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences and Ors.

16 Jun 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4986

The Delhi High Court directed NBEMS to convert a vacant OBC reserved DNB Post Diploma seat under All India Quota to unreserved category and allot it to the petitioner to prevent wastage of medical seats.

administrative petition_allowed Significant DNB Post Diploma Counselling OBC reservation All India Quota seat conversion