Delhi High Court
31,373 judgments
Jayaditta Palit & Anr. v. Pramod Anand Through His Legal Heir
The Delhi High Court restored a petition dismissed as withdrawn due to inadvertence, directing payment of enhanced costs to reinstate documents taken off record for non-payment.
Rajesh Kumar v. Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Singh
The Delhi High Court refused to interfere with the Trial Court’s order condoning delay in filing written statement in a commercial suit after trial completion, emphasizing the statutory 120-day limit and allowing the petitioner to raise the issue in appeal.
Harish Chander Pandey v. The Jag Jivan Cooperative House Building Society Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s refusal to allow the petitioner to amend pleadings to introduce a belated and fundamentally new claim of society membership and flat allotment, dismissing the petition under Article 227.
Balaji Steel v. Sialkot Shop
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of a vague amendment application to reduce the suit amount, while allowing the petitioner to seek waiver of imposed costs.
Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. v. KRA Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court remanded the arbitral tribunal's order for fresh consideration of a jurisdictional issue concerning the applicability of the MSME Act to a works contract, emphasizing limited but necessary judicial interference under Article 227.
M/S SISLA LABORATORIES v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CGST
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a belated appeal against the rejection of a GST refund application due to non-communication of the order and directed processing of a second refund application with interest.
Hari Nath & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the Court's power under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to promote peace and avoid futile litigation.
Jitender @ Kalla v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed a life convict's writ petition and granted furlough despite a 12-day late surrender, holding that non-wilful delay and a warning do not bar furlough under prison rules aimed at rehabilitation.
Mubina v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that detention and confiscation of gold jewellery worn by a passenger without issuing a proper show cause notice and personal hearing under Section 124 of the Customs Act is illegal, and such jewellery as personal effects must be released.
Rajveer Singh v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal restoring a complaint dismissed for non-appearance due to bona fide error, clarifying that such dismissal is not acquittal and the proper remedy is appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC.
Rahul Shrma & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
Manu Yadav & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary, amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the court's power to promote peace in matrimonial disputes.
Surendra Kumar v. C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court reduced the sentence of a 90-year-old convicted public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act to the period already served, emphasizing mitigating factors including advanced age, health, and prolonged trial delay, while upholding the conviction.
Sh. Rana Mukharjee & Anr. v. The State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process of law.
Raman Chawla and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Sh. Waseem v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings to secure justice.
Geeta Bedi v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principle that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Mustkeen @ Mota v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that active facilitation in the offence and serious evidence on record preclude bail once trial has commenced.
Sajib Qureshi v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 308/34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties, applying the principle that criminal proceedings may be quashed if continuation would be unfair or an abuse of process despite the seriousness of the offence.
Rahul Bisht v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.