Delhi High Court
65,510 judgments
Dr. Vidya Sagar Garg v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
The Delhi High Court held that rejection of an Insolvency Professional registration application due to pending criminal proceedings is premature and allowed reconsideration if the discharge application is granted.
M/S RHA ENTERPRISES v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the DGFT to seek timely clarification from the DRI and issue duty credit scrips to the petitioner if no response is received within four weeks, emphasizing expeditious administrative action.
Balvir Singh v. Securities & Exchange Board of India
The Delhi High Court set aside SEBI Recovery Officer's attachment order for non-compliance with mandatory notice requirements under the Income Tax Act, directing issuance of fresh notice and opportunity to the petitioner.
Joginder Kaur & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if neither possession is taken nor compensation is paid or deposited in court, clarifying the meaning of 'paid' compensation.
Inderbir Singh v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of parking site allotment and forfeiture of earnest money due to admitted Benami bids, allowing the petitioner to challenge the cancellation through appropriate legal remedies.
Dhruv Bhasin & Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court as mandated under the 1894 Act, entitling petitioners to compensation under the new law.
Kamal Kant Bansal & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that non-payment of compensation to landowners and failure to deposit it in court leads to lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Shiv Dutt Sharma v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court, even if possession is taken.
Baba Balbir Singh v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld that possession taken by the government under the Land Acquisition Act vests ownership in the government, and the 2007 Act does not protect encroachments on such acquired land.
Rahul Narang v. Harinder Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree for recovery of a dishonoured cheque amount where the underlying commercial agreement was held valid and the drawer failed to prove otherwise.
Ashok Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a man for sexually assaulting a 4-year-old girl, relying on consistent victim testimony and DNA evidence, but modified the sentence to be under Section 376 IPC alone as per POCSO Act provisions.
Sukhjinder Singh v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions directing issuance of passports to persons who had previously sought political asylum, following a binding Division Bench ruling.
Ajay Kumar v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court disposed of three petitions as not pressed after the respondents granted the relief sought by the petitioners.
Through Ms Jamine Damkewala v. Director General of Civil Aviation
The Delhi High Court directed the DGCA to reconsider and revise its Civil Aviation Requirement on cabin crew duty and rest periods in light of amended rules and safety concerns, providing petitioners a hearing before issuing fresh regulations.
ALFA BHOJ LTD. v. MAHIPAL SINGH
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions filed by Alpha Bhoj Ltd. for non-appearance and non-prosecution.
Pramta Kundra v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the third anticipatory bail applications of the petitioners, holding that no new circumstances were shown beyond those already considered by the Court.
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. v. RAM ROOP & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, insurer liability does not extend to unauthorized drivers, disallowed future prospects addition, and modified compensation accordingly.
National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Khushi Ram & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal to reduce non-pecuniary compensation in a motor accident claim, aligning the award with the Supreme Court’s guidelines in National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi.
Ayush Lohia and Anr v. Land Acquisition Collector (South) and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court and possession not taken, and persons interested including power-of-attorney holders have locus standi to seek such declaration.
Pallav Mongia v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Civil Aviation Requirement does not permit overbooking and does not restrict passengers' rights to claim compensation for denied boarding beyond the prescribed immediate relief.