Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
The Central Public Information Officer, Central Bureau of Investigation v. Central Information Commission and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings against a CBI officer do not constitute human rights violations under Section 24(1) of the RTI Act, and thus the CBI is not obliged to disclose such information under the Act.
Amarjeet Pandey v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a POCSO case after the child victim voluntarily recanted earlier allegations and implicated another person.
Alok Kumar v. High Court of Delhi
Delhi High Court considered the validity of the age cut-off date for judicial service examination eligibility, emphasizing adherence to Supreme Court directions and fairness to younger candidates.
Alok Kumar v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that age cut-off dates for judicial service examinations must align with the recruitment timeline to avoid unfairly excluding eligible candidates and directed reconsideration of the cut-off date.
Reliance Communications Ltd. v. ATC Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interim order under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, clarifying that such orders are prima facie and interlocutory, allowing parties to raise all objections at final hearing and permitting modification applications to be heard expeditiously.
Satish Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid to the landowner nor deposited in court, and mere deposit in government treasury does not suffice.
M/S. SUPERON SCHWEISSTECHNIK INDIA LIMITED v. M/S. GEETECH INDIA
The Delhi High Court granted an ex-parte injunction and summary decree in favor of the prior user plaintiff against unauthorized use of identical and deceptively similar trademark and trade dress by the defendant who failed to appear or defend.
Lotus Herbals Limited v. The Chief Commissioner of Custom & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and ex parte decree against defendants for trademark infringement of LOTUS mark, accepting defendant's undertaking and permitting confiscation of infringing goods.
Kamal Jindal v. Sushil Kumar Aggarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the subsequent Will dated 12.7.2002 validly revoked the earlier Will and that the appellant failed to prove ownership or maintain the suit after respondent's death.
Harish Kumar v. State; Veerpal v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed revision petitions challenging convictions for theft under Sections 457, 380, and 34 IPC, affirming concurrent findings of guilt based on possession of stolen goods and breaking implements.
Tapan Kumar Deo v. Union of India; Pratap Singh Ahluwalia v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the ACC's discretionary decision to decline appointments of petitioners as DRT Presiding Officers based on adverse Intelligence Bureau reports, holding that Selection Committee recommendations are advisory and reasons need not be communicated.
Tapan Kumar Deo v. Union of India; Pratap Singh Ahluwalia v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the ACC's discretionary decision to decline appointments of petitioners as DRT Presiding Officers based on adverse Intelligence Bureau reports, holding that recommendations are advisory and reasons need not be communicated.
Karan Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that for NDPS Act quantity determination, the entire drug mixture must be considered, denying bail to the petitioner found in possession of commercial quantity of narcotic drugs.
Mohd Irshad Khan v. Union of India
The High Court of Delhi considered Bail Application No. 2140/2017 filed by Mohd Irshad Khan against the Union of India.
Mohd Parvej v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court reserved and delivered judgment on a bail application filed by Mohd Parvej in a criminal matter involving customs authorities.
Karan Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court reserved and delivered judgment on a bail application filed by Karan Sharma in a customs-related criminal matter.
Mohd Parvej & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that for NDPS Act quantity determination, the entire drug mixture must be considered, not just pure drug content, and denied bail to accused found prima facie guilty of possessing commercial quantity of narcotic drugs.
Karan Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the entire mixture's weight of narcotic drugs must be considered for quantity determination under the NDPS Act, upheld the trial court's charge of possession of commercial quantity, and dismissed the petitioner's bail application under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Inder Pal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid to landowners nor deposited in court, rejecting deposit in government treasury as valid payment.
Vikas Chandel v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the SSB to step up the petitioner's pay to the revised scale applicable to direct recruits from 2006, following established precedents on pay parity.