Pramta Kundra v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

i-
$~39«fe40 •-
* IN THE HIGH GOURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 265/2018; . > ^ . \
;/ • PRAMTA KUNDRA ^ , . - ; . '
. , • , . , .....Petitioner;
Represented by: Mr. D.K. Ahuja, Adv. rf-
• ,' .

• , THE STATE (ipVT OF NGT OF DELHI !
. , : - ' ' ' , ' ' . -"... Respondent
^ . Represented by: ; Ms. MeenaksHi Chauhan, APP
• ^ ' with SI Rajesh Kumar PS Kotla
.. Mubarak Pur, . , - ' -
BAIL:^PLN! 272/2018. ,/ " ' ^
RICKYKUNDRA , '
; Represented by:

, THE STATE GOVT OF NGT OF DELHI
, Represented by: '
'GORAM:". ' y , V,; '
HON'BLE MS. JUSTIGE MUKTA
% 02.02.2018
Crl.M.A. 2024/2018 in BAIL APPLN. 265/2018 , Crl.M.A. 2053/2018 in BAIL APPLN. 272/2018
BAIL APPLNs. 265/2018 & 272/2018
Petitioner
Respondent page 1 of2
2018:DHC:8196
-BAIL APPLN. 265/2018 and BAIL APPLN. 272/2018
This is the third anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioners.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the change in circumstance is the status report dated 27^^ November, 2017 of SHO PS Kotla Mubarak Pur.
The status report dated 27'*^ November, 2017 was duly considered by this
Court while passing the order dated 29^^ November, 2017 where after the anticipatory bail appHcations were dismissed. This cannot be the new circumstance.
' Petitions are accordingly dismissed.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
FEBRUARY 02, 2018
'ga'
BAILAPPLNs. 265/2018 iSc 272/2018 page 2 of2
2018:DHC:8196