Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Balbir Singh v. B.S.E.S Yamuna Power Ltd. and Anr.

26 Feb 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1392

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of an employee's transfer order in light of his medical condition and dependent's illness, emphasizing that transfer decisions must consider genuine medical grounds and not be arbitrary.

administrative other Significant transfer order medical grounds malafide transfer transfer policy

Ashutosh Vashisth v. Union of India and Ors.

26 Feb 2018 · Hima Kohli; Pratibha Rani · 2018:DHC:1395-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing a fresh thorough medical examination of the candidate at Army R&R Hospital to verify fitness for recruitment after prior medical boards declared him unfit due to hypertension.

administrative petition_allowed medical fitness hypertension BMI medical board

Rakesh Kumar Singh Bisht v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited & Anr

26 Feb 2018 · Hima Kohli; Pratibha Rani · 2018:DHC:1394-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld BSNL's weightage point system for compassionate appointments, dismissing the petitioner's claim as he failed to meet eligibility criteria and emphasizing that compassionate appointment is not a vested right but an exception to provide immediate relief.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment weightage point system BSNL indigency criteria

Preeti Umaro & Ors. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.

26 Feb 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:1409

The Delhi High Court held that admission criteria specified in a university prospectus cannot be altered retrospectively by applying amended UGC regulations, quashing circulars imposing new conditions on students admitted under earlier regulations.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Admission prospectus UGC Regulations 2009 UGC Regulations 2016 Retrospective application

M/S HUMBOLDT WEDAG INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. CIT, CIRCLE-3, KOLKATA

26 Feb 2018 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; A. K. CHAWLA · 2018:DHC:1403-DB

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, the Commissioner must provide all material relied upon, including witness statements, to the assessee before passing a revisional order, and remanded the matter for fresh proceedings with full disclosure.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 263 Income Tax Act revisional jurisdiction natural justice disclosure of material

Abhey Kumar Jain v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

26 Feb 2018 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:1382

The Delhi High Court upheld the imposition of penalty on a contractor for delay in completing road improvement work, rejecting the defense of non-payment due to pending formalities.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contractual delay liquidated damages extension of time quality control

M/S United India Insurance Company Limited v. Jai Parkash Tayal

26 Feb 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:1381

The Delhi High Court held that broad exclusion of genetic disorders in health insurance policies is illegal and discriminatory, upholding the insured's claim despite the insurer's repudiation based on such exclusion.

insurance appeal_dismissed Significant genetic disorders health insurance exclusion clause fundamental right to health

Sunil @ Raghu v. State

26 Feb 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1385-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of murder, kidnapping, and attempted unnatural sex charges due to incomplete circumstantial evidence, unreliable DNA reports, investigative lapses, and violation of fair trial rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence DNA fingerprinting fair trial last seen evidence

State v. Naresh Jain

23 Feb 2018 · S.P. Garg · 2018:DHC:1347

The Delhi High Court granted leave to the State to appeal against the acquittal of Naresh Jain in a counterfeit currency case due to discrepancies in trial evidence, while dismissing leave against co-accused for lack of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant counterfeit currency acquittal leave to appeal Section 489B IPC

S. v. M.K.

23 Feb 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Deepa Sharma · 2018:DHC:1346-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dissolution of marriage on the ground of mental cruelty by the wife, including unsubstantiated allegations and threats of suicide, affirming the Family Court's judgment.

family appeal_dismissed Significant mental cruelty cruelty under Hindu Marriage Act divorce on cruelty grounds unsubstantiated allegations

S K v. V K K & Another

23 Feb 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Deepa Sharma · 2018:DHC:1378-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the son's delayed appeal against a Family Court order directing him to pay maintenance to his elderly parents under Section 125 Cr.P.C. due to non-compliance and lack of merit.

family appeal_dismissed maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. Family Courts Act, 1984 elderly parents

Varun Makkar and Anr. v. Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana and Anr.

23 Feb 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1367

The Delhi High Court allowed relief to directors disqualified due to a struck-off company by directing adherence to procedural remedies under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, following established precedent.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Directors disqualification Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Anirudh Singha v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Feb 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1366

The Delhi High Court stayed the disqualification of a Director pending ROC’s examination of his resignation claim and ordered reactivation of his DIN and DSC to enable continued functioning.

corporate petition_allowed Significant Director disqualification Registrar of Companies Director Identification Number Digital Signature Certificate

Flint Group India Private Limited v. Jagran Prakashan Limited

23 Feb 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1376

The Delhi High Court set aside the order converting a summary suit into an ordinary suit, holding that substituted service under Order V Rule 20 CPC was unnecessary after valid service by affixation under Order XXXVII CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant summary suit Order XXXVII CPC Order V Rule 20 CPC service of summons

Vijay Charlu v. Union of India; Sandesh Chhatwal v. Union of India

23 Feb 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher

Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions directing restoration of struck-off company’s name and stayed directors’ disqualification pending compliance under Companies Act, 2013 and Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Section 164(2)(a) Section 248(2) Director disqualification

Sanjay Kalra v. Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana

23 Feb 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1363

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to seek removal of their struck-off company from the Register under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and stayed their disqualification pending such application, following the precedent set in Sandeep Singh & Anr.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Section 248(2) disqualified directors Registrar of Companies

Manoj Kumar & Anr. v. Registrar of Companies & Ors.

23 Feb 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1364

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing stay of disqualification of Directors pending compliance with Section 248(2) of the Companies Act and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, applying earlier judicial directives.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Section 248(2) disqualified directors Registrar of Companies

Prabha Kumari v. Food Corporation of India

23 Feb 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1354

The Delhi High Court directed the Food Corporation of India to consider the petitioner's representation for appointment from the wait list within a specified time frame, emphasizing procedural fairness in recruitment.

administrative petition_dismissed wait list appointment Assistant Grade-III Food Corporation of India

IFCI Ltd. v. Ceylon Biscuit and Others

23 Feb 2018 · Hima Kohli; Indermeet Kaur · 2018:DHC:1352

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, affirming that a secured creditor retains independent remedies under the SARFAESI Act despite winding up proceedings and that the Official Liquidator's association with asset sale does not preclude such rights.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act secured creditor winding up proceedings Official Liquidator

Narendra Yadav v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

23 Feb 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1357

The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with an ongoing departmental inquiry regarding disputed documents, holding that admissibility and evidentiary issues are to be decided by the Inquiry Officer at the inquiry's conclusion.

administrative petition_dismissed departmental inquiry charge sheet admissibility of documents writ jurisdiction