Delhi High Court

30,090 judgments

Year:

Anmol Chhuneja v. State of NCT Delhi

25 Jul 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:6078

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354(D) IPC for stalking after the petitioner tendered an apology accepted by the complainant, emphasizing the court's power to quash proceedings upon amicable settlement.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 354(D) IPC stalking amicable settlement

Ajay Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi

25 Jul 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:6092
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a husband accused of dowry harassment and dowry death, emphasizing the gravity of the allegations and the prima facie evidence including video call and parents’ testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC

Hukam Singh Meena v. Union of India & Anr.

25 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6136-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging appointments for non-impleadment of affected candidates, allowing the petitioner to file afresh with proper parties.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition appointment eligibility criteria impleadment

Suman Devi and Anr v. Rakesh Kumar Sharma

25 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6149-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an interlocutory injunction restraining former employees from using a deceptively similar trademark, affirming the territorial jurisdiction of courts over online business presence and the exclusive rights of registered trademark proprietors.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Deceptive similarity Territorial jurisdiction

Union of India v. GP Capt T Kumaresan

25 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:6117-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, rejecting the medical board's finding of no service connection as arbitrary.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Rajendra Prasad Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.

25 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6051-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner not holding the post of Assistant Engineer on the date of notification of the Recruitment Rules is not entitled to promotion benefits granted by retrospective seniority fixation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant promotion eligibility seniority fixation Recruitment Rules 2012 Assistant Engineer

Union of India and Ors. v. Shailendra Kumar Sharma Group A

25 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6073-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting pay protection benefits to an employee moving between government services, rejecting the petitioners' reliance on an arbitrary Office Memorandum limiting such benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pay protection Office Memorandum 10.07.1998 Article 14 administrative tribunal

Gagan Malhotra v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

25 Jul 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6205

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a serious sexual offence case after chargesheet filing, finding no risk of flight or witness tampering and noting the investigation was complete.

criminal bail_granted bail Section 483 BNSS Section 439 CrPC sexual offences

DSSSB AND ANR. v. MOHAN LAL CHHEDWAL

25 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6155-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging relief granted for lack of SMS/email intimation to the respondent, emphasizing the absence of direct documentary proof.

administrative petition_dismissed review petition intimation by SMS intimation by email Advertisement No. 04/2017

Utility Forms Private Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

25 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to defective notice on the portal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court ruling.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab Section 168A GST Act

Shri Ram Sharma Proprietor Shri Ram and Company v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr.

25 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6121-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order for failure to effectively communicate Show Cause Notices, emphasizing the requirement of fair notice and opportunity to be heard under natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab natural justice

Salak Chand Proprietor S K Associates v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr.

25 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6122-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order for failure to effectively communicate notices, directing fresh adjudication after providing the petitioner a fair opportunity to be heard.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab natural justice

State v. Rakesh & Anr.

25 Jul 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:6239

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal seeking enhancement of sentence under Sections 394/34 IPC, upholding the Sessions Court's order modifying the sentence to the period already undergone by the accused with consideration of mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 394 IPC Section 34 IPC sentence modification common intention

Union of India v. M/S Garg Builders

25 Jul 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:6257
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by limitation, holding that delay beyond 120 days under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act cannot be condoned and objections to unilateral arbitrator appointment may be raised at execution stage.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation period Condonation of delay

C K Infrastructure Limited v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited

25 Jul 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:6314

The Delhi High Court held that the petition challenging the arbitral award was filed within the limitation period and the delay caused by return for lack of jurisdiction was condoned under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Limitation period Section 14 Limitation Act condonation of delay

Kiran Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6562-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and enhanced sentence of a BSF constable for rape and forgery based on consent vitiated by false promise of marriage and forged death certificate, affirming limited judicial review in GSFC proceedings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape forgery false promise of marriage consent vitiation

Giriraj Singh v. UOI and Ors.; Bhagat Singh v. UOI and Ors.

25 Jul 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:6370-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the penalty imposed on RPF personnel for alleged negligence, holding that judicial interference in disciplinary punishment is warranted when the penalty is strikingly disproportionate and relevant mitigating factors are ignored.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Railway Protection Force Rules disciplinary proceedings quantum of penalty judicial review

Gaurav Kwatra v. State

25 Jul 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:6042

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a robbery case due to insufficient direct evidence and inconclusive circumstantial links connecting him to the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed bail robbery circumstantial evidence telephonic records

Dr Shambhuji v. Manoj Kumar Mann

24 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6088

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh, clarified application under Order XV-A CPC for rent arrears, remitting the matter to the Trial Court for fresh adjudication uninfluenced by prior orders.

civil other Order XV-A CPC rent arrears possession defense restoration

Himani v. Akshay Gupta & Anr.

24 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6089

The High Court directed the trial court to provide the petitioner a copy of the pendrive evidence on payment of costs to enable effective cross-examination in a divorce proceeding.

family other pendrive cross-examination media file trial court