Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Deepak Kumar Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a cheating and forgery case after considering the prolonged custody, stage of trial, and absence of risk of tampering with evidence or witnesses.
Sunil Kumar & Anr. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Ferrero SPA & Ors. v. M.B. Enterprises
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Ferrero SPA, permanently restraining the defendant from selling counterfeit 'NUTELLA' products, declared 'NUTELLA' a well-known trademark, and awarded damages and costs for trademark infringement and passing off.
Waterways Leisure Tourism Private Limited v. Mukesh Prasad Thapliyal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using deceptively similar marks incorporating "Cordelia" in the hospitality sector, affirming the plaintiff's exclusive rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Vinod Bhardwaj
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused for serious charges due to lack of evidence and maintained the conviction with fine for lesser offences, dismissing the State's appeal for enhancement.
Sanjay Kumar Jain v. State (Through A.C.B)
The Delhi High Court acquitted three MCD officials of corruption and cheating charges due to lack of cogent evidence proving conspiracy, loss, or corrupt intent, emphasizing the necessity of valid sanction and reliable proof in public servant prosecution.
Union of India & Ors. v. CDR Maha Ram Yadav
The High Court of Delhi allowed the Union of India to withdraw writ petition W.P.(C) 10895/2025 and disposed of it accordingly.
Nnamdi Ezen eche v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to foreign nationals accused of violence in a detention centre, directing their release on personal bond with conditions and ordered inquiry into withheld CCTV evidence.
Mohd Tazeem v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a procedural order directing utility authorities to inform the court about disconnection of electricity and water supply at a property involved in unauthorized construction, holding that the petitioner lacked locus standi to challenge such an order.
Yesak Angsom Gebrreegizagaber v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case due to lack of direct evidence connecting him to the drug seizure, relying primarily on insufficient CCTV footage and recovery of cash.
Subhan v. State (GNCT) of Delhi; Masoom v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for armed robbery and assault based on credible eyewitness identification, recovery of stolen goods, and medical evidence, dismissing their appeal despite minor inconsistencies and absence of fingerprint matches.
Kiran Pathak v. Phire Ram and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that compensation for land acquired for a wildlife sanctuary should be enhanced annually at a cumulative rate of 12%, dismissing the Union of India's appeal and allowing respondents' cross objections.
Pradip Kumar Singh v. All India Council for Technical Education
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a candidate's recruitment application for failure to submit the required experience certificate in the prescribed format by the closing date, emphasizing strict adherence to eligibility criteria and procedural requirements.
Satya Nisht v. National Testing Agency
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner compensatory grace marks for loss of exam time due to biometric verification interruptions during NEET (UG) 2025, applying the Supreme Court's normalisation formula from Disha Panchal.
Avek Raj & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354(A), 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the Court's power to end criminal proceedings where continuation would be unjust.
Jati Sharma & Others v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and related IPC provisions based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
Kaddu @ Shiva & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under multiple IPC sections based on a bona fide compromise between parties, affirming the Court's power under Section 528 BNSS to end criminal cases where continuation would be unjust.
Amit Jindal v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Vikash Kumar v. Reserve Bank of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the RBI's eligibility criteria restricting Assistant Manager (Protocol and Security) recruitment to ex-servicemen from regular Armed Forces, excluding CAPF personnel, and dismissed the petition challenging this classification as non-arbitrary under Article 14.
Pervez v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted a final two-day extension of interim bail for the petitioner to surrender, considering medical treatment needs and financial arrangements, and disposed of the bail application accordingly.