Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. GP Capt T Kumaresan

25 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:6117-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, rejecting the medical board's finding of no service connection as arbitrary.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Rajendra Prasad Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.

25 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6051-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner not holding the post of Assistant Engineer on the date of notification of the Recruitment Rules is not entitled to promotion benefits granted by retrospective seniority fixation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant promotion eligibility seniority fixation Recruitment Rules 2012 Assistant Engineer

Union of India and Ors. v. Shailendra Kumar Sharma Group A

25 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6073-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting pay protection benefits to an employee moving between government services, rejecting the petitioners' reliance on an arbitrary Office Memorandum limiting such benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pay protection Office Memorandum 10.07.1998 Article 14 administrative tribunal

Gagan Malhotra v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

25 Jul 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6205

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a serious sexual offence case after chargesheet filing, finding no risk of flight or witness tampering and noting the investigation was complete.

criminal bail_granted bail Section 483 BNSS Section 439 CrPC sexual offences

DSSSB AND ANR. v. MOHAN LAL CHHEDWAL

25 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6155-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging relief granted for lack of SMS/email intimation to the respondent, emphasizing the absence of direct documentary proof.

administrative petition_dismissed review petition intimation by SMS intimation by email Advertisement No. 04/2017

Utility Forms Private Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

25 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to defective notice on the portal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court ruling.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab Section 168A GST Act

Shri Ram Sharma Proprietor Shri Ram and Company v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr.

25 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6121-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order for failure to effectively communicate Show Cause Notices, emphasizing the requirement of fair notice and opportunity to be heard under natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab natural justice

Salak Chand Proprietor S K Associates v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr.

25 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6122-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order for failure to effectively communicate notices, directing fresh adjudication after providing the petitioner a fair opportunity to be heard.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab natural justice

State v. Rakesh & Anr.

25 Jul 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:6239

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal seeking enhancement of sentence under Sections 394/34 IPC, upholding the Sessions Court's order modifying the sentence to the period already undergone by the accused with consideration of mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 394 IPC Section 34 IPC sentence modification common intention

Union of India v. M/S Garg Builders

25 Jul 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:6257
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by limitation, holding that delay beyond 120 days under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act cannot be condoned and objections to unilateral arbitrator appointment may be raised at execution stage.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation period Condonation of delay

C K Infrastructure Limited v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited

25 Jul 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:6314

The Delhi High Court held that the petition challenging the arbitral award was filed within the limitation period and the delay caused by return for lack of jurisdiction was condoned under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Limitation period Section 14 Limitation Act condonation of delay

Kiran Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6562-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and enhanced sentence of a BSF constable for rape and forgery based on consent vitiated by false promise of marriage and forged death certificate, affirming limited judicial review in GSFC proceedings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape forgery false promise of marriage consent vitiation

Giriraj Singh v. UOI and Ors.; Bhagat Singh v. UOI and Ors.

25 Jul 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:6370-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the penalty imposed on RPF personnel for alleged negligence, holding that judicial interference in disciplinary punishment is warranted when the penalty is strikingly disproportionate and relevant mitigating factors are ignored.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Railway Protection Force Rules disciplinary proceedings quantum of penalty judicial review

Gaurav Kwatra v. State

25 Jul 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:6042

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a robbery case due to insufficient direct evidence and inconclusive circumstantial links connecting him to the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed bail robbery circumstantial evidence telephonic records

Dr Shambhuji v. Manoj Kumar Mann

24 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6088

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh, clarified application under Order XV-A CPC for rent arrears, remitting the matter to the Trial Court for fresh adjudication uninfluenced by prior orders.

civil other Order XV-A CPC rent arrears possession defense restoration

Himani v. Akshay Gupta & Anr.

24 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6089

The High Court directed the trial court to provide the petitioner a copy of the pendrive evidence on payment of costs to enable effective cross-examination in a divorce proceeding.

family other pendrive cross-examination media file trial court

Shree Radhe Vallabh Traders v. Commissioner Central Goods and Service Tax, Delhi East Commissionerate, New Delhi

24 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6032-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for IGST refund due to retrospective cancellation of the petitioner’s GST registration and concealment of material facts.

tax petition_dismissed IGST refund GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation bona fide exporter

Narender v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr

24 Jul 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6800

Bail was denied to the petitioner accused of murder under Section 302 IPC due to the gravity of the offence, substantial evidence, and prior conviction despite prolonged custody and pending forensic reports.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 302 IPC murder judicial custody

Asha Jain v. Sajjan Pasari & Anr.

24 Jul 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:6052-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against vacation of interim injunction in a partition suit, holding that the probate order in favor of Respondent No. 1 is binding and the appellant failed to establish grounds for injunction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant probate order injunction prima facie case balance of convenience

Union of India & Ors. v. WG CDR George Joseph Retd No 28298

24 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent employer's proof to the contrary and limiting writ review to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction