Delhi High Court

30,090 judgments

Year:

Kaddu @ Shiva & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

28 Jul 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:6150

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under multiple IPC sections based on a bona fide compromise between parties, affirming the Court's power under Section 528 BNSS to end criminal cases where continuation would be unjust.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS amicable settlement compromise in criminal cases

Amit Jindal v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

28 Jul 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:6151

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC amicable settlement

Vikash Kumar v. Reserve Bank of India

28 Jul 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:6168

The Delhi High Court upheld the RBI's eligibility criteria restricting Assistant Manager (Protocol and Security) recruitment to ex-servicemen from regular Armed Forces, excluding CAPF personnel, and dismissed the petition challenging this classification as non-arbitrary under Article 14.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant eligibility criteria ex-servicemen Central Armed Police Forces Article 14

Pervez v. Directorate of Enforcement

28 Jul 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:6166

The Delhi High Court granted a final two-day extension of interim bail for the petitioner to surrender, considering medical treatment needs and financial arrangements, and disposed of the bail application accordingly.

criminal other interim bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 medical treatment bail extension

Prateek Yadav & Anr. v. LC Nueva AIF & Anr.

28 Jul 2025 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela; Devendra Kumar Upadhya... · 2025:DHC:6186-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the dismissal of a recall application in contempt proceedings, affirming that contempt jurisdiction is limited to determining contempt and not adjudicating merits of underlying disputes.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant contempt jurisdiction novation settlement agreement share purchase agreement

Late J.P. Gupta v. Bosch Limited

28 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:6112-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of abatement of suit against the legal representatives of a deceased sole proprietor, emphasizing a liberal, justice-oriented approach to procedural delays under Order XXII CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant abatement of suit Order XXII CPC substitution of legal representatives condonation of delay

Pushpa @ Baby v. State & Anr.

28 Jul 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:6114
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that non-payment of maintenance constitutes economic abuse under the DV Act and restored maintenance of ₹4,000 per month each to the petitioner and her minor child.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 economic abuse maintenance domestic violence

Veda Vyasa Dav Public School v. Devender Kumar Arya & Anr.

28 Jul 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:6214-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that acceptance of resignation or termination of a private school employee without prior approval of the Director of Education under mandatory statutory provisions is invalid, dismissing the school's appeal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant resignation relieving order Director of Education approval Delhi School Education Rules, 1973

Deepak Kumar Khemka v. Yogesh Kumar Jaiswal & Ors.

28 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6176-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a suit seeking injunction against a trademark application, holding that mere filing without actual use does not constitute a cause of action for infringement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off cause of action Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Union of India & Ors. v. SGT Ravinder (Retd)

28 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6189-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is service-related unless rebutted by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Court on Its Own Motion v. Delhi Cantonment Board

28 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:6204-DB

The Delhi High Court directed coordinated efforts and cost-bearing by the PWD for timely construction of a temporary Bailey Bridge and permanent Foot Over Bridge to ensure soldier and public safety.

administrative other Procedural Foot Over Bridge Bailey Bridge Delhi Cantonment Board Public Works Department

Maharani Bagh Co-Operative House Building and Welfare Society Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:6200-DB

The Delhi High Court directed joint action by PWD and MCD and urged centralization of flood management to address waterlogging in Maharani Bagh caused by ineffective coordination among multiple agencies.

administrative other Significant waterlogging drainage management Public Works Department Municipal Corporation of Delhi

M v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr

28 Jul 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:6139

The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence and the need for reliable corroborative evidence in appeals against acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal rape Section 376 IPC double presumption of innocence

Fateh Singh Chauhan v. Union of India and Ors

25 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:706-DB

The Delhi High Court corrected its earlier order to record the inadvertent omission of the learned CGSC's appearance, treating the correction as a corrigendum.

other other correction of order appearance of counsel clerical error court order

Govinda @ Bhura v. State of NCT of Delhi

25 Jul 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:6574

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence for robbery with a deadly weapon despite non-recovery of the weapon, affirming that victim's credible testimony suffices for conviction under Section 397 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant robbery Section 397 IPC weapon of offence non-recovery of weapon

Smt Shashi v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

25 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6528

The Delhi High Court set aside a No Dispute Award passed without service of notice and remanded the labor dispute for fresh adjudication before the correct tribunal.

labor appeal_allowed Significant No Dispute Award service of notice Industrial Tribunal Labour Court

Madhu v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Jul 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:6357-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a BSF constable for unauthorized absence and failure to respond to official communications, emphasizing strict discipline and proper address for correspondence in armed forces service matters.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Border Security Force Act disciplinary enquiry unauthorized absence overstaying leave

M/S Sakshi Trading Company v. Additional Commissioner, Appeal-I Central Tax, East and Anr

25 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6120-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh inspection and reconsideration of restoration of GST registration after the petitioner submitted relevant documents and complied with statutory requirements for change of address.

administrative other Significant GST registration cancellation restoration change of address

Brand Protectors India Pvt. Ltd. v. Anil Kumar

25 Jul 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6044

The High Court held that under Section 223(1) B.N.S.S., cognizance cannot be taken without prior notice and opportunity to the accused, and pre-summoning evidence cannot be recorded before taking cognizance, thereby upholding procedural safeguards absent in the earlier CrPC regime.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant cognizance pre-summoning evidence Section 223 B.N.S.S. Section 225 B.N.S.S.

Ses Ram v. State of NCT Delhi

25 Jul 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6043
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prolonged trial delay and procedural irregularities, emphasizing the constitutional right to speedy trial over statutory bail restrictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act bail commercial quantity Charas