Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Bodhisattva Charitable Trust and Ors. v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research

28 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6317-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining appellants from using the mark MAYO, holding that the respondent's prior trademark registrations confer exclusive rights and the appellants' use constitutes infringement and dishonest adoption.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Trademark infringement Trade Marks Act 1999 Interim injunction Passing off

Mohd Amjad Thakur v. Sarah @ Sonia Dhir

28 Jul 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:6133
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of a nearly 10-year delay in challenging a maintenance order, holding that ignorance of law and the marriage's nullity do not justify such delay under the Limitation Act.

family petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay maintenance order Section 125 CrPC Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act

Daksh Bhardwaj v. University of Delhi

28 Jul 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:6383

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking re-election for vacant Central Councillor posts, holding that the J.M. Lyngdoh Committee mandates re-elections only for major posts within two months and that re-elections after the academic session ends are not feasible.

administrative petition_dismissed J.M. Lyngdoh Committee recommendations student union elections Central Councillor vacancy re-election mandate

IIFL Finance Limited v. Lacecraft

28 Jul 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:6403
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the loan dispute.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator scope of judicial scrutiny prima facie arbitration agreement

M/S SHYAM ENTERPRISES v. SUPERINTENDENT, RANGE 136, CGST, MANDOLI DIVISION, EAST DELHI

28 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6177-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to petitioner’s non-compliance, allowing the petitioner to apply afresh for registration.

administrative petition_dismissed GST registration cancellation of registration revocation of cancellation Article 226

Niranjan Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

28 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6212-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld interim relief preventing recruitment pending adjudication by the Central Administrative Tribunal and directed expeditious disposal of the original application.

administrative petition_allowed interim relief Central Administrative Tribunal status quo expeditious adjudication

Ranbir Saran Das v. Sandeep Kumar & Anr.

28 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6243

The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition challenging the dismissal of an application to delete a party.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision jurisdiction interlocutory order Order I Rule 10(2) CPC

SH VEERU & ANR. v. CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE & ANR.

28 Jul 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:6198-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as withdrawn at the request of the petitioner.

other other Procedural writ petition withdrawal disposal High Court of Delhi

Triveni Sales Corporation v. Government of NCT of Delhi

28 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6174-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order for lack of proper notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair opportunity to be heard.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab natural justice

M/S SURYA ROSHNI LIMITED v. M/S SURIYA SUNLITE LED PVT LTD

28 Jul 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:6190-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the dismissal of a trademark infringement suit, decreeing it in terms of the parties' recorded settlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant settlement commercial suit trademark infringement permanent injunction

Ravinder Singh & Ors. v. Directorate General Indo Tibetan Border Police Force & Ors.

28 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6178-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioners' request and cancelled the next hearing date.

other other Procedural writ petition withdrawal disposal High Court of Delhi

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Sgt Ranjeet Kumar Akela

28 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · AIR 1960 SC 1168
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Mritunjay and Sgt PK Yadav, Air Force Legal Cell v. Ex-JWO Bhagwan Yadav

28 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · AIR 1960 SC 1168
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Paul Deepak Rajaratnam & Ors. v. Surgeport Logistics Private Limited & Anr.

28 Jul 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:6137
Cites 1 · Cited by 6

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim arbitral award enforcing non-compete obligations under a subsisting shareholders' agreement, dismissing the appellants' challenge to its validity and termination.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim relief Section 37(2)(b) appeal Shareholders' Agreement

Pankaj Jain v. Parul Jain

28 Jul 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:6077-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of injunction applications under Section 22 of the Hindu Marriage Act, ruling that references to matrimonial proceedings in bona fide legal defence do not constitute prohibited publication.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 22 Hindu Marriage Act in-camera proceedings publication prohibition matrimonial litigation confidentiality

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. v. BAPUNA ALCOBREW PRIVATE LIMITED

28 Jul 2025 · ANIL KSHETARPAL; HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR · 2025:DHC:6080-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the refund of excise duty and import permit fee paid without actual import of liquor, affirming the doctrine of unjust enrichment and maintainability of writ petitions for such refund claims.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant excise duty refund import permit fee Delhi Excise Act 2009 unjust enrichment

Devender Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi

28 Jul 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:6138

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to a police constable accused of corruption, emphasizing the extraordinary nature of anticipatory bail and the need for absolute intolerance towards corruption by public servants.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Prevention of Corruption Act public servant corruption Delhi Police

Vedanta Limited v. Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Ltd

28 Jul 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:6185
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration agreement existed prima facie between Vedanta and Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation based on bid acceptance and conduct, and appointed the respondent's arbitrator to proceed with arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Agreement Section 11(6) Arbitration Act Section 7 Arbitration Act Gas Sales Agreement

Sher Singh Rawat v. State NCT of Delhi

28 Jul 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:6129
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application in a murder case, holding that prima facie evidence including eyewitness and electronic evidence justified denial of bail once trial had commenced.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant regular bail murder Section 302 IPC prima facie evidence

Jarnail Singh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

28 Jul 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6147

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to a petitioner accused of providing forged documents for a U.S. VISA application, holding that absence of prima facie evidence and cooperation with investigation justified bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail forgery visa fraud Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita