Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Virag Tiwari v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-21 & Others

12 Mar 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:1721-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the PMGK Scheme does not permit credit of advance tax paid prior to the scheme but allowed partial benefit under both the PMGK Scheme and Section 115BBE to avoid undue hardship due to procedural confusion.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojna PMGK Scheme advance tax credit Section 115BBE

Dr. Ravi Prakash v. State & Anr.

12 Mar 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:1722

The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and acquitted the petitioner by compounding the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following a settlement between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 147 compounding of offence

Union of India & Anr. v. Sameer Sachdeva

09 Mar 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:1895

The Delhi High Court held that unilateral curtailment of contract tenure and termination without hearing violate natural justice, awarding reduced damages for wrongful termination after mitigation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant contractual appointment termination natural justice audi alteram partem

Rajeev Mukhiya and Ors. v. Union of India

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1657

The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of Companies to follow established precedent allowing directors of struck-off companies to seek revival under Section 248(2) and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, staying their disqualification pending compliance.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant disqualified directors Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Sameerramkumar Verma v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:8573

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to follow the Harpreet Singh Batra judgment and allowed the petitioner interim relief from director disqualification pending revival steps under the Companies Act and Condonation of Delay Scheme.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant disqualified directors Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

D.D.JOSHI v. RAJEEV MEHRA

09 Mar 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:8572-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue remedy before the Registrar of Cooperative Society.

administrative appeal_dismissed writ petition withdrawal of petition liberty to approach authority Registrar of Cooperative Society

Pankaj Virdi v. Punjab National Bank

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:8571

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking de-sealing of property under SARFAESI Act, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

civil petition_dismissed writ petition mandamus de-sealing property SARFAESI Act

Karanjit Singh Chopra v. Union of India and Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:8569

The Delhi High Court allowed interim relief to a director disqualified due to a struck off company, directing compliance with Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018 as per established precedent.

corporate petition_allowed Significant disqualified directors Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) struck off company

Vijay Singh v. Union of India

09 Mar 2018 · R. T. A. Mittal · 2018:DHC:8548-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing removal of directors' disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, upon compliance with the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018.

corporate petition_allowed Significant Section 164(2)(a) Companies Act 2013 disqualification of directors Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018 filing of statutory returns

Ambika Mittal and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:8546-DB

Delhi High Court allowed directors disqualified under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act to regularize their status under the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018 and directed removal of their names from the disqualified list upon compliance.

corporate petition_allowed Significant Companies Act 2013 Section 164(2) Section 248(1) disqualification of directors

Kannan Gopal Vinod v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

09 Mar 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:8545

The Delhi High Court permitted students to appear in semester examinations subject to an Expert Committee's report and disposed of related petitions as not pressed, allowing limited liberty to challenge the report.

administrative petition_dismissed Expert Committee University examinations Grievances of students Writ petitions

Puneet Gupta & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr

09 Mar 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:8382

The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs registered under various IPC sections following an amicable settlement between neighbors, emphasizing the court's discretion to end criminal proceedings in the interest of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR compromise mediation Sections 147, 148, 149 IPC

Rakesh Tiwari v. Union of India and Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1710

The Delhi High Court stayed the disqualification of a director listed for non-filing of statutory documents, allowing him to regularize his status under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, following the precedent in Harpreet Singh Batra.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant disqualified directors Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Rajendari Devi v. Pramod Kumar Basotia

09 Mar 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:1709

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the property was sold for Rs.5.65 lakhs with possession delivered, dismissing the Plaintiff's suit for possession and emphasizing the need for proper preservation of original documents in Trial Courts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant possession decree sale consideration possession letter registered documents

Jawaharlal Nehru National Youth Centre & Ors. v. Registrar of Societies / DCI & Anr

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1708

The Delhi High Court dismissed review petitions challenging its earlier order in a writ petition concerning the Registrar of Societies, affirming the limited scope of review.

civil petition_dismissed review petition Registrar of Societies jurisdiction finality of orders

Hitender Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1698

The Delhi High Court set aside the CIC order denying RTI information to an OCI cardholder for lack of hearing and directed reconsideration, emphasizing the CIC's duty to apply independent mind and afford natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 OCI cardholder Central Information Commission quasi-judicial function

Tarun Kumar Gaur v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1697

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-maintainability, directing the petitioner to challenge the rejection order before the Central Administrative Tribunal, which has jurisdiction over the service matter.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal policy decision writ petition maintainability

Purshottam Dutt v. Savitri Public School and Anr.

09 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1696

The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging removal from service, directing the petitioner to file an appeal before the Delhi School Tribunal as per statutory mandate.

administrative petition_dismissed Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Section 8(3) removal from service writ petition

Micro Devices Inc. v. Infocom Digital Systems (P) Ltd.

09 Mar 2018 · JAYANT NATH · 2018:DHC:1694

The Delhi High Court held that EPFO dues have statutory priority over secured creditors in winding-up, directing the Official Liquidator to pay EPFO before releasing funds to the bank.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant Employees Provident Fund Act priority of debts secured creditor Official Liquidator

Rajeev Saxena v. The Chief General Manager, Bank of Baroda & Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1693

The Delhi High Court upheld compulsory retirement and related penalties against a bank officer found guilty of serious financial irregularities causing substantial loss, rejecting claims of mere administrative role and disproportionate punishment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant compulsory retirement departmental inquiry financial irregularities bank employee misconduct