Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Shri Sunil Kumar Chaudhary v. The Director of Education and Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1692

The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings must be initiated by the Disciplinary Committee under Rule 118 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, and directed the Committee to rectify procedural lapses before continuing the inquiry.

administrative other Significant disciplinary proceedings Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 Rule 118 Disciplinary Committee

N. Nagarjuna Rao v. Govt. of NCT Delhi

09 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1691

The Delhi High Court quashed the rejection of ex post facto approval of technical resignation for pension purposes and directed the Directorate of Education to reconsider the matter with a reasoned order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant technical resignation ex post facto approval pension entitlement CCS (Pension) Rules

Ripudaman Lamba and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1701

Delhi High Court directed respondents to follow Sandeep Singh precedent allowing petitioners to take steps under Section 248(2) Companies Act and Condonation of Delay Scheme for a struck off company.

corporate petition_allowed Significant Section 248(2) Companies Act 2013 Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018 striking off company name Director Identification Number (DIN)

Gulab Singh Tanwar & Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1702

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing expeditious disposal of the petitioners' appeal for revival of struck off companies and stayed their disqualification under the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant disqualified directors struck off companies revival of companies Section 252(1) Companies Act 2013

Devang Jayantilal Shah v. Union of India and Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1703

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to apply the Harpreet Singh Batra judgment mutatis mutandis, allowing the petitioner to regularize his disqualification under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, and stayed the operation of the disqualification list against him.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant disqualified directors Section 248(2) Companies Act 2013 Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018 striking off companies

Ajay Kumar Singhal v. Union of India and Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1704

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to regularize his director status under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, staying his disqualification pending compliance.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Director disqualification Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Krishnamoorty Chandru and Anr v. Union of India & Anr

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1700

The court stayed the disqualification of directors of a struck-off company pending their compliance with statutory revival procedures and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, following established precedent.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant disqualified directors Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Surender Singh v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

09 Mar 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1707

The Delhi High Court held that a valid driving licence protects the vehicle owner’s insurance benefits despite alleged forgery, but the owner must bear interest liability for non-cooperation during tribunal proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim driving licence validity insurance policy breach recovery rights

Pushpa Devi v. Puran Singh & Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1706

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for permanent disability in a motor accident claim by applying minimum wages and future prospects for loss of income and increased interest rate to 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation permanent disability loss of income

Association of Medical Biochemists of India v. Medical Council of India

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1699

The Delhi High Court directed the Medical Council of India to consider the petitioner's representation regarding eligibility of certain postgraduate medical professionals to sign laboratory reports and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks.

administrative other Procedural Medical Council of India laboratory reports postgraduate medical qualifications Biochemistry

Sanjay Kumar Chaudhary v. Union of India and Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1705

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to regularize his director status under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, staying his disqualification pending compliance.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant disqualified directors Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Jai Bhagwan v. Rakesh & Anr

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:1683

The Delhi High Court dismissed a suit for specific performance for lack of jurisdiction and improper parties, holding that minors must be impleaded with a guardian appointed and that the suit did not meet the court's pecuniary or commercial jurisdiction requirements.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance Agreement to Sell minors Order XXXII Rule 3(2) CPC

Rakesh Kumar Juneja & Ors. v. Surinder Pal Kaur

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:1687

The Delhi High Court held that a civil suit for cancellation of a final probate order is not maintainable and the proper remedy is revocation under the Indian Succession Act, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit challenging the probate.

civil petition_dismissed Significant probate revocation of probate Indian Succession Act 1925 title dispute

Syndicate Bank v. Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities & Anr

09 Mar 2018 · C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:1686

The Delhi High Court held that the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities lacks jurisdiction to review her own orders or exercise appellate powers over disciplinary authorities under the PWD Act, quashing the impugned review order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities Review jurisdiction Appellate powers

M/s REEBOK INDIA COMPANY v. H. REHANULLA SHARIF

09 Mar 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1685

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's leave to defend application in a commercial suit for recovery of dues under a written settlement agreement, holding that frivolous defences not raising triable issues warrant summary decree with interest and costs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend frivolous defence C-Forms

Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. v. K.B.G. Engineers

09 Mar 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:1684

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the petitioners' challenge to the levy of liquidated damages and confirming the respondent's entitlement to escalation claims and extension of time, holding that the Superintending Engineer's decision was subject to arbitration.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Arbitral Award Superintending Engineer

Sudhir Kumar Windlass v. Union of India and Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1682

The Delhi High Court directed the ROC to consider the petitioner’s complaint of fraudulent directorship and ordered interim activation of his DIN and DSC pending decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Director disqualification Registrar of Companies fraudulent appointment Director Identification Number

Surinder Pal Sharma v. Raj Kumari & Ors.

09 Mar 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1681

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that a duly registered Will attested by two witnesses is valid even if only one attesting witness is examined, setting aside the trial court's partition decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will execution attesting witnesses Indian Succession Act Indian Evidence Act

PHOENIX UDYOG PVT. LTD. v. MAXPURE WATER SYSTEM PVT. LTD.

09 Mar 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1680

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an ex-parte decree for recovery of unpaid goods, holding the suit was within limitation, territorial jurisdiction was established, and ex-parte proceedings were justified due to defendant's non-appearance.

civil appeal_dismissed ex-parte decree limitation territorial jurisdiction buyer-seller dispute

Jaspal Singh v. Mohinder Singh & Anr.

09 Mar 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1679

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant failed to prove the genuineness of a disputed Will, resulting in intestate succession and equal partition of the property among all children.

civil appeal_dismissed Will execution attesting witnesses forensic handwriting expert intestate succession