Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Dr. Devender Pal Singh Tomar v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Mar 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:1869

The Delhi High Court held that retention of original academic documents without an express contractual provision is illegal, and directed their release despite breach of a surety bond.

civil petition_allowed Significant surety bond retention of original documents mandamus short service commission

Puja Buildwell Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Mar 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:1868

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking restoration of possession, holding that the respondents did not interfere with the petitioner’s land and may remove encroachments on forest land after due process.

property petition_dismissed demarcation report possession forest land encroachment

Desh Raj Sharma v. Mohd. Sabir & Ors.

16 Mar 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1887

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition upholding the eviction order where the landlord demonstrated genuine business need and no sufficient alternative accommodation was available.

property appeal_dismissed eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) leave to contest

Subhash Chand v. Amit Kumar & Ors.

16 Mar 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1889

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for pain and suffering and loss of amenities in a motor accident claim and held the insurer liable to pay despite an invalid driving licence, preserving insurer's recovery rights against the owner.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement pain and suffering loss of amenities of life

Rajender Narayan Rastogi & Ors. v. Jagdish Sethi

16 Mar 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1891

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of an eviction petition based on bona fide need, holding that death of a petitioner does not extinguish the need and that additional affidavits can be permitted under Section 151 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 bona fide need eviction petition Section 14(1)(e)

Ram Kishan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

16 Mar 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:1892-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if neither possession is taken nor compensation paid within five years of the award.

property petition_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) of 2013 Act Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act physical possession

Adarsh Sharma v. Balvinder Kumar & Ors.

16 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1894

The Delhi High Court directed allotment of an alternate plot to the petitioner due to the presence of an underground storm water drain beneath the originally allotted plot, emphasizing public safety and equitable payment terms.

property appeal_allowed Significant land allotment storm water drain public safety Delhi Development Authority

Sushmita Mitra v. Parthasarthi Mitra

15 Mar 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:9274-DB

The Delhi High Court recorded a lawful settlement agreement between spouses in a divorce proceeding and disposed of the appeals accordingly.

family appeal_allowed settlement agreement matrimonial dispute divorce by mutual consent demand draft

Damini Wadhwa v. Union of India and Ors

15 Mar 2018 · G. S. Sisjani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:8553-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act where physical possession was taken and compensation paid to recorded owners, dismissing a subsequent purchaser's challenge.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 physical possession compensation payment

Damini Wadhwa v. Union of India and Ors

15 Mar 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:8552-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that acquisition proceedings did not lapse as physical possession was taken and compensation paid to recorded owners, denying locus standi to a subsequent purchaser.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 physical possession compensation payment

CISCO SYSTEMS CAPITAL (INDIA) PVTLTD v. KAPILPURI

15 Mar 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:8410

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw criminal petitions with liberty to raise all pleas before lower courts and granted exemption from personal appearance subject to just exceptions.

criminal appeal_dismissed withdrawal of petition liberty to raise pleas exemption from personal appearance criminal miscellaneous petition

Zile Singh v. Food Corporation of India & Ors.

15 Mar 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:1865-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging the penalty imposed for loss to the Food Corporation of India, affirming the reduction of penalty based on correct loss calculation and rejecting abandoned grounds.

civil appeal_dismissed loss calculation penalty reduction departmental enquiry principles of natural justice

Headquarters Delhi Area Printing Press v. Gopal Singh

15 Mar 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:1864-DB

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, courts can direct payment of minimum wages if higher than last drawn wages, dismissing the employer's appeal against such a direction.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Section 17-B Industrial Disputes Act minimum wages last drawn wages subsistence allowance

Emecon Controls Pvt Ltd v. M/S PSA Nitrogen Limited & Ors.

15 Mar 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:1863

The Delhi High Court dismissed the winding up petition due to a bona fide dispute over debt but held the respondent liable for tax liability arising from non-supply of C-Forms, directing partial payment release and permitting civil remedies.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant winding up petition Companies Act 1956 section 433(e) bona fide dispute

D. S. Singh v. Indian Council of Agricultural Research

15 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1862

The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Council of Agricultural Research to verify the correct location of the Institute and determine the appropriate HRA rate, disposing of the writ petition without deciding on the merits.

administrative other House Rent Allowance Indian Institute of Vegetable Research Indian Council of Agricultural Research HRA rate dispute

Shyam Babu & Ors. v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

15 Mar 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:1860-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider street vendors' claims on merits without rejecting them solely for absence during survey, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative petition_dismissed street vendors Delhi Street Vendors Rules 2017 Town Vending Committee Article 226 Constitution

M/S Technosat Comm (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

15 Mar 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:1861-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of injunction restraining encashment of a Fixed Deposit Receipt as performance security, directing the arbitrator to decide interim relief under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Fixed Deposit Receipt Bank Guarantee Performance Security Section 9 Arbitration Act

Sanjiv Bhatia v. Sanjana Bhatia & Ors.

15 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:1849

The Delhi High Court passed a decree for partition by sale of a Hindu ancestral property among heirs, rejecting delayed defenses and emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines.

civil appeal_dismissed partition suit Hindu Succession Act, 1956 closure of right to file written statement sale of property

ASI/Clerk Devi Ram Tiru v. Union of India

15 Mar 2018 · Hima Kohli; Pratibha Rani · 2018:DHC:1850-DB

The Delhi High Court held that promotees appointed through LDCE must have their pay fixed at par with direct recruits to the same post, quashing orders that fixed their pay lower without due process.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant pay fixation direct recruits promotees Limited Departmental Competitive Examination

Ankur Chhibber v. Union of India

15 Mar 2018 · Hima Kohli; Pratibha Rani · 2018:DHC:1851-DB

The Delhi High Court held that departmental candidates appointed through LDCE are to be treated as direct recruits for pay fixation, entitling them to the entry-level pay scale prescribed under CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, and quashed orders fixing their pay at a lower scale.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Direct recruits Pay fixation CCS Revised Pay Rules 2008