Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Jagdish Kumar Koli v. National Bal Bhavan & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed National Bal Bhawan to reconsider the petitioner’s pay scale revision claim under its bye-laws and pass a reasoned order, allowing the petitioner to pursue further remedies thereafter.
Shri Deepak Sharma and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the GNCTD to decide the petitioners' pending representation for grant of allowances to contract Para-Medical Staff by passing a speaking order within a stipulated time.
Jyotsna Mishra v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an impugned order for failure to pass a detailed speaking order on a promotion-related representation and directed fresh consideration in compliance with its earlier directions.
G Raju v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the street vendor’s application on merits and held that absence during survey alone cannot justify rejection.
Shakuntala Devi & Anr v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not tendered to the landowner, even if possession was taken earlier, under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.
Sikandar @ Babu v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld his conviction under Sections 354, 451, and 506(I) IPC for sexual assault and related offences against a minor, relying on consistent victim and complainant testimony despite minor contradictions and absence of medical injuries.
V4 Infrastructure Private Ltd v. Jindal Biochem Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award refunding consideration paid under terminated property sale agreements, holding the termination illegal and affirming limited judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
V4 Infrastructure Private Ltd v. Jindal Biochem Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award refunding consideration with interest after holding the termination of property sale agreements illegal, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
P.P. Sharma v. Chief Justice of Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal from service, holding that procedural fairness was observed in the disciplinary enquiry and non-supply of preliminary enquiry statements or enquiry report prior to dismissal did not vitiate the order.
M/S L.G. ELECTRONICS INDIA (P) LTD v. DINESH KALRA
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award, emphasizing limited judicial interference in arbitration and rejecting the appellant's claims of expanded contract scope and limitation bar.
Vedanta Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-9, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act is mandatorily allowable under Explanation 5 to Section 32(ii), and directed the Tribunal to decide related international transaction issues on merits without remand.
Deepak Kashyap v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for the premeditated murder of his wife, rejecting the claim of sudden fight under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.
Jyoti Gupta v. Kewalsons & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration agreements survive the death of a partner and legal heirs have the right to invoke arbitration clauses in partnership deeds, ordering appointment of an arbitrator to resolve the disputes.
MIDEAST PIPELINE PRODUCTS THROUGH PROPRIETOR MANINDER SINGH v. FERNAS CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for breach of contract, holding that an arbitrator cannot rewrite clear contractual terms by importing implied conditions absent from the agreement.
Dharmender & Anr v. State
The Delhi High Court modified murder convictions to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, reducing sentences based on absence of premeditation and corroborated eyewitness and medical evidence.
Arun Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Arun Kumar and Mahender Singh for robbery and murder under circumstantial evidence, rejecting their claims of alibi and planting of evidence.
Arun Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of two accused for robbery and murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, including recovery of stolen property and weapon, and reliable mobile phone records.
Shiv Giri v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by a street vendor lacking official recognition, holding that protection under the Street Vendors Act requires pre-existing rights evidenced by licence or inclusion in official lists, and directed the petitioner to seek relief from the Town Vending Committee.
SNECMA v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a patent examination request made within the statutory period must be accepted despite initial fee payment irregularities, applying unamended Patent Rules to condone delay in entering the Indian National Phase.
S.P. CONTRACTS PVT. LTD. v. A.N. BUILD WELL PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that petitions against a company under liquidation are not maintainable without Company Court's leave and granted liberty to the petitioner to file claims before the Official Liquidator, extending interim protection over disputed equipment.