Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

M/S Ramco Steels Private Limited v. State Bank of India & Anr.

21 Mar 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1962

The Delhi High Court held that a bank forwarding shipping documents as an agent per principal's instructions is not liable for negligence absent failure to courier documents, and the foreign buyer's payment liability requires proof of receipt of goods.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant agency liability negligence international trade documentary collection

District and Sessions Courts Employees Welfare Association v. District & Sessions Judge (Headquarters)

21 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1967

The Delhi High Court directed the District and Sessions Judge to expeditiously consider and respond to the petitioners' representation regarding filling vacant subordinate staff posts in the Delhi District Courts.

administrative other writ petition vacant posts subordinate staff administrative action

National Insurance Company Limited v. Premwati & Ors.

21 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1979

The Delhi High Court modified motor accident compensation awards reducing future prospects addition to 30%, disallowed loss of love and affection, held insurer liable to pay first despite bounced premium cheque but granted recovery rights against vehicle owner.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance liability bounced cheque future prospects

EAGLE INFRA INDIA LTD v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

21 Mar 2018 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2018:DHC:1964

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting a concessionaire's claim for revenue loss due to non-payment of tolls, holding that the risk of such loss lies with the concessionaire and not the National Highway Authority of India.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Concession Agreement User fee collection National Highways Act, 1956

Onkar Nath Kapoor Through LRS & Ors. v. Jawahar Lal Kapoor Through LRS. & Ors.

21 Mar 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1972

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a partition suit, holding that the property was already partitioned among heirs as per an admitted Will and acted upon by separate possession and mutation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition Will mutation self-acquired property

Saurabh Yadav v. Union of India and Ors.

21 Mar 2018 · Hima Kohli; Pratibha Rani · 2018:DHC:1976-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an independent board for a recruitment candidate declared unfit due to hypertension, emphasizing the right to a fair medical assessment.

administrative petition_allowed medical examination recruitment Central Armed Police Forces hypertension

Rajesh Kumar Jha v. Central Railside Warehouse Company Limited

21 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1970

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of a removal-from-service appeal, emphasizing the need for a speaking order and proper consideration of private sector experience equivalence.

administrative other Significant statutory appeal removal from service speaking order private sector experience

T.P. Singh Punita Kaur v. Director, Directorate of Education and Ors

21 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1971

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent school to pass a reasoned order on the petitioners’ legal notice regarding implementation of 6th Pay Commission recommendations within six weeks, disposing of the writ petitions accordingly.

administrative other 6th Pay Commission implementation legal notice speaking order

T.P. Singh Punita Kaur v. Director, Directorate of Education and Ors

21 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1975

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent school to pass a speaking order on the petitioners' legal notice regarding implementation of 6th Pay Commission recommendations, disposing of the writ petitions with appropriate timelines.

administrative other 6th Pay Commission implementation of pay commission recommendations legal notice speaking order

Janardhan v. The State

21 Mar 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1961-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder based on circumstantial evidence and lack of proof of premeditation, reducing his sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part I IPC Section 106 Indian Evidence Act circumstantial evidence

Suresh @ Pawan v. State

21 Mar 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1965-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of murder and attempt to murder charges due to lack of medical corroboration and investigative lapses but convicted them for causing simple injuries under Section 324 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant ocular evidence medical evidence investigation lapses Section 302 IPC

Virender Kumar Trehan & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Mar 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:1968-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed delayed Section 6 land acquisition notifications issued beyond the permissible period after judicial stay, reaffirming that no fresh one-year period arises post-quashing under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

property petition_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 6 notification quashing of notification statutory limitation period

C EDMONDS ALLEN v. CBI & ANR

21 Mar 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:1963

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the petitioner’s bail cancellation application within six weeks, without commenting on its merits.

criminal appeal_allowed bail cancellation expeditious disposal trial court direction criminal procedure

C EDMONDS ALLEN v. CBI & ANR

21 Mar 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:1966

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the petitioner's protest petition against the CBI's Closure Report without commenting on the merits.

criminal petition_allowed protest petition closure report expeditious disposal trial court direction

National Insurance Company Limited v. Premwati & Ors.

21 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1978

The Delhi High Court held that insurer is not liable to pay compensation when insurance cover is withdrawn due to bounced premium cheque, reduced compensation quantum in line with Supreme Court precedent, and granted insurer recovery rights against vehicle owner.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance liability insurance premium bounced cheque future prospects

Krishan Bidhuri v. Narender Kumar

21 Mar 2018 · Manmohan · 2018:DHC:1969

The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a lawful mediated settlement agreement under Section 89 CPC, awarding recovery and interest due to the defendant's non-compliance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant settlement agreement Section 89 CPC Order 23 Rule 3 CPC mediation

MCD v. Jai Singh

21 Mar 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1973

The Delhi High Court adjourned eviction execution proceedings sine die pending resolution of acquisition challenges, declining to order mesne profits during the pendency.

civil other Significant eviction order execution proceedings acquisition proceedings mesne profits

MCD v. Jai Singh & Ors.

21 Mar 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1974

The Delhi High Court stayed execution of a final eviction order pending resolution of a writ petition challenging acquisition of the disputed property, holding that acquisition proceedings directly affect possession rights under the eviction decree.

civil other Significant eviction order execution proceedings land acquisition stay of execution

CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. FUTURE CAPITAL INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

21 Mar 2018 · C. Hari Shankar · 2020:DHC:3812

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining alienation of the Dreamplex Mall as additional security for outstanding loans, holding that the lender can independently enforce multiple securities pending arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 9 Arbitration Act interim injunction security interest loan agreement

Santosh Tikoo v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors

20 Mar 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sanjit Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:8541-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation not paid within five years, and a subsequent purchaser has locus standi to claim such lapse.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) 2013 Act land acquisition lapse of acquisition proceedings physical possession