T.P. Singh Punita Kaur v. Director, Directorate of Education and Ors

Delhi High Court · 21 Mar 2018 · 2018:DHC:1975
Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 2723/2018 & 2733/2018
2018:DHC:1975
administrative other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent school to pass a speaking order on the petitioners' legal notice regarding implementation of 6th Pay Commission recommendations, disposing of the writ petitions with appropriate timelines.

Full Text
Translation output
W.Ps.(C) 2723/2018 & 2733/2018 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: March 21, 2018
W.P.(C) 2723/2018
W.P.(C) 2733/2018
T.P. SINGH PUNITA KAUR .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Abhimanuyi Sharma and Ms. Deepali, Advocates
VERSUS
DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ORS.....Respondents
Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitish Singh and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates for respondent No.1 (in W.P.(C) 2723/2018)
Mr. Sujeet K. Mishra, Advocate for respondent
No.1 (in W.P.(C) 2733/2018)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. Petitioners in the above-captioned two petitions seek implementation of orders of 14th February, 2013 and 18th February, 2013 vide which respondent-School has been directed to implement 6th Pay Commission’s Recommendations in terms of order of 11th February, 2009 of respondent-Directorate of Education.

2. Since the subject matter in the above-captioned two petitions is identical, therefore, they are taken up for hearing together and by this common order, they are being disposed of. 2018:DHC:1975 W.Ps.(C) 2723/2018 & 2733/2018

3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that despite legal notice of 4th September, 2017 sent on behalf of petitioner to respondents, there is no compliance of the orders of 14th February, 2013 and 18th February,

2013.

4. Despite service of advance notice, none appears on behalf respondent-School.

5. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of these petitions with direction to respondents to pass a speaking order on petitioners’ Legal Notice of 4th September, 2017 while treating it to be Representations, within a period of six weeks from today, if not already done, and its fate be conveyed to petitioners within a week thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.

6. With aforesaid directions, these petitions are disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for petitioners.

JUDGE MARCH 21, 2018 s