Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Dr. Nistha Midha v. Director General of Health Services and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging simultaneous counseling for postgraduate medical seats conducted as per the Medical Council of India notification, holding the petitions not maintainable for failure to challenge the foundational notification or implead the MCI.
Commissioner of Customs (General) v. SAP India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside the CESTAT's remand order and restored appeals to be decided on merits including jurisdiction, clarifying that the Tribunal must independently adjudicate jurisdictional issues without undue influence from related High Court decisions.
Dr. Rajesh J. Aeren v. State & Ors.
The court allowed withdrawal of petitions after charge sheet filing with liberty to challenge framing of charges and permitted correction of a wrongly filed vakalatnama.
Jagdish Arora v. Narender Kapoor
The High Court dismissed the petitions and accompanying applications as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request to withdraw them.
Vodafone India Limited v. Prashant Mahadeorao Buradkar; Vodafone India Limited v. Rajesh Suhas Rele
The Delhi High Court allowed Vodafone India Limited to withdraw its petitions in view of the Cyber Appellate Tribunal's constitution, extending interim protection for four weeks to enable approach to the tribunal.
Aruna Mittal v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a criminal petition following settlement between parties and quashing of the FIR under multiple IPC sections.
Federation of Nehru Place Association v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that Nehru Place is a declared no-hawking and no-vending zone, setting aside the earlier order and directing municipal authorities to enforce this status in line with prior judicial decisions.
Ashok Kumar and Ors v. Lt Governor through Chief Secretary Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation for regularization of Guest Teachers by passing a speaking order within a fixed time while maintaining status quo on their service.
Shahwaiz Ahmed and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that termination of contractual employees without framed Recruitment Rules is unjustified and directed their service to be treated as dispensed upon contract completion, with consideration for regularization under government orders.
Sudha Saxena v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that before reducing pension and recovering excess payments, the pensioner must be given an opportunity of hearing, and recovery cannot proceed without a fresh order after such hearing.
J.R. William Singh v. The Institute of Chartered Accountants
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of an electrician seeking promotion and pay scale benefits as Section Officer, holding that officiation without formal promotion and a valid policy governing pay scales precluded such claims.
New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Mahesh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal, set aside the compensation award, and remanded the matter for recording additional evidence to ensure just compensation for grievous injuries sustained in a motor accident.
Solanki Girish v. UOI and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary punishment imposed on a CISF constable for uniform violation and insubordination, holding the proceedings and penalty lawful and proportionate.
Amolak Singh v. Vinay Narain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an agency agreement without parting possession does not constitute sub-letting under the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing the landlord's eviction petition.
Dr P Samarendra v. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a government notification not published in the Official Gazette in accordance with law cannot be enforced, and directed the Registrar of Cooperative Societies to process the petitioner’s application without insisting on proof of residence.
SUPERON SCHWEISSTECHNIK INDIA LIMITED v. MODI HITECH INDIA LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's commercial suit seeking injunction for passing off of the descriptive abbreviation trademark VAC-PAC, holding that descriptive marks lack exclusive protection absent distinctiveness and that the defendant's use alongside a different primary trademark did not constitute passing off.
Avdesh Gupta v. Satish Sharma & Anr
The High Court restored the trial court's conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the accused failed to rebut the presumption of liability despite the appellate court's erroneous acquittal.
Sh. Ashwani Kumar and Ors. v. M/s Institute of Hotel Management, Catering and Nutrition, Pusa and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an industrial award on grounds of delay and res judicata, holding that the petitioners were employees of a contractor and not the management.
Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited v. Good Media News Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and Rs. 1 crore damages to T-Series against a cable operator for unauthorized broadcasting of copyrighted works without a valid license.
Maya Sharma v. Unique Law Publication House & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction restraining defendants from using the trademark UNIQUE and similar marks for law books, holding that the plaintiff proved prior use and passing off.