Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Vimmi Puri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:2246

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust, holding that the allegations were unsubstantiated and custodial interrogation was unnecessary.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 420 IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Vimmi Puri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:2247

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a criminal case involving alleged fraudulent delivery of jewellery, finding the allegations unsubstantiated and investigation complete.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 420 IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Vimmi Puri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:2252

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a criminal case involving alleged fraudulent jewellery transaction, finding the allegations unsubstantiated and no need for custodial interrogation.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail false implication counterblast Section 420 IPC

Vimmi Puri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:2251

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a criminal case involving alleged fraudulent delivery of jewellery, finding no necessity for custodial interrogation and noting the investigation was complete.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail false implication Section 420 IPC Section 406 IPC

Sanjeev Chugh v. Om Prakash Batra & Anr.

06 Apr 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:2250

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding the landlord's bona fide requirement for commercial premises genuine and no suitable alternative accommodation available.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement eviction

Care Finance Limited v. Central Bank of India

06 Apr 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:2249

The Delhi High Court held that a full and final settlement recorded before a Lok Adalat is binding and precludes recovery of additional amounts beyond the agreed sum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Lok Adalat settlement Sections 91 and 92 Indian Evidence Act full and final settlement equitable mortgage

Dhani Ram v. The State & Anr

06 Apr 2018 · J. R. Midha · 2018:DHC:2248

The Delhi High Court reduced the compensation awarded for simple injuries in a motor accident case, emphasizing the need for evidence-based and proportionate awards.

civil appeal_allowed compensation Claims Tribunal personal injury clavicle fracture

D. K. Chopra v. NCT of Delhi & Ors.

06 Apr 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:2270

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to attend a scheduled hearing with the concerned officer, maintain civility, and mandated the officer to pass a speaking order on the grievance, disposing of the petition accordingly.

administrative petition_dismissed hearing grievance redressal civility speaking order

Dev Chander Sood & Ors. v. H.L. Sud & Ors.

06 Apr 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:2267

The Delhi High Court granted partition of HUF property by sale and distribution of proceeds, declared unauthorized gift deeds null and void, and barred defendants from raising defenses after closure of their right to file a written statement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Undivided Family Partition Gift Deed Written Statement

Inflow Technologies Pvt Ltd v. Gramtech (India) Pvt Ltd

06 Apr 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:2268

The Delhi High Court admitted a winding up petition against a company for non-payment of dues, holding that limitation starts from receipt of invoice and completion certificate, and that the respondent was liable to pay the petitioner.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant winding up petition Companies Act 1956 limitation period Implementation Completion Certificate

Bhagwant Singh Pabla & Ors. v. Current Advertising (P.) Ltd. & Anr.

06 Apr 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:2272

The Delhi High Court allowed eviction of tenants for unauthorized subletting by a third-party company without landlord's prior written consent under Section 14(1)(b) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(b) subletting eviction

Jewels India Hotels Private Limited v. Surender Bajaj and Ors.

06 Apr 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:2271

The Delhi High Court held that property tax dues prior to a sale cleared by the seller and certified by NDMC cannot be recovered from the buyer, affirming the seller's liability for pre-sale dues.

civil appeal_allowed Significant No-Due Certificate property tax dues municipal dues sale of property

Anu Yadav v. Secretary (School Edu. and Literacy) and Ors.

06 Apr 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:2265

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking belated acceptance of NEET 2018 examination fees, holding that incomplete online application submission before the deadline cannot be condoned.

administrative petition_dismissed NEET examination online application process examination fee procedural compliance

Diksha Lamba v. University Grants Commission & Ors.

06 Apr 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:2239

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s M.Phil degree from a recognized Indian university qualified her for the NET certificate despite non-equivalence of her foreign Master’s degree, quashing the cancellation of her NET result.

administrative petition_allowed Significant National Eligibility Test University Grants Commission Association of Indian Universities equivalence of foreign degrees

RADHA KRISHAN & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through Mr.N.K. Upadhyay, Adv. v. BAL BHARTI PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. .....

06 Apr 2018 · HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) · 2018:DHC:2257
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking admission under the EWS category after the prescribed cut-off date, affirming that admissions must be completed by 31st December as per the Delhi RTE Rules, 2011.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant EWS admission Delhi RTE Rules 2011 admission cut-off date draw of lots

Rajpal v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors

06 Apr 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:8583

The Delhi High Court directed authorities to follow due process including hearing and issuance of a speaking order before demolishing a cow shed on ancestral land, staying coercive action pending proceedings.

administrative petition_allowed due process of law show cause notice demolition ancestral land

MRS. MAJEET KAUR v. ESTATE OFFICER ANDORS

06 Apr 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:8582

The Delhi High Court held that recovery of damages for unauthorized occupation of public premises must follow the statutory procedure under the Public Premises Act, and coercive measures like salary stoppage cannot be imposed without due process.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 Section 7 damages recovery unauthorized occupation

Aliasgar Qaizar Bookwala & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Apr 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher, J. · 2018:DHC:8555

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions with liberty, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn and disposing of the related applications.

constitutional petition_allowed writ petition withdrawal leave to withdraw liberty

RADHA KRISHAN & ORS. Petitioner Through Mr.N.K. Upadhyay, Adv. v. BAL BHARTI PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS

06 Apr 2018 · HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI. J (ORAL) · 2018:DHC:8556
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking admission to EWS category seats after the prescribed cut-off date of 31st December 2017, affirming that admissions must be completed within the academic year as per the Delhi RTE Rules, and unfilled reserved seats can be carried forward to the next year.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant EWS/DG category admission Delhi Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011 cut-off date for admission draw of lots

Urmila & Ors v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

06 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:8431

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a quarrel between hawkers and welfare association president following an amicable settlement, emphasizing the court's power to end futile criminal proceedings to secure justice.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR cross FIRs settlement ends of justice