Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Suresh Kumar Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation against adverse administrative orders by passing speaking orders within specified timeframes, ensuring procedural fairness.
Ashok Kumar Choudhury v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Sahitya Akademi to reconsider the withdrawal of first ACP benefits by providing a fair hearing and passing a speaking order, while staying recoveries pending final decision.
Rakesh Kumar Puri v. Union Bank of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent-Bank to reconsider the dismissal of a retired employee in light of Supreme Court precedent prohibiting post-retirement dismissal and emphasizing proportionality of punishment.
Commercial Senior Secondary School v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to consider the petitioner's representation for appointment of a Nominee to initiate disciplinary proceedings and communicate its decision within a stipulated time.
M/S. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. LAKSHMI JUNEJA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld insurer liability without contributory negligence, adjusted compensation quantum in line with evidence and Supreme Court guidelines, and directed payment of revised amounts with interest.
Puja Kumar; Laxmi Rana; Vasudha Srivastava v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the concerned authority to consider and decide the petitioners' pending representations for service regularization by passing a speaking order within a stipulated timeframe.
Getamber Anand & Anr. v. Anil Kumar Saha
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing petitioners to pay ₹110 crores and transfer shares and properties to the respondent, holding that the petitioners breached the MOU and that the award was not void under Section 297 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Union of India & Ors. v. Arun Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitrator appointed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has jurisdiction to adjudicate Counter Claims and cannot terminate arbitration proceedings on such claims without valid reasons.
IHHR Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. v. Ananda Resort
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs to the prior user and registered proprietor of the trademark 'ANANDA' against the defendant's unauthorized use, allowing summary judgment in absence of defense.
Godfrey Phillips India Limited v. P.T.I. Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's review petition challenging the summary dismissal of its commercial suit, holding that no error apparent on the face of the record justified review under CPC and that summary dismissal under Order XIIIA is valid at the admission stage.
Virender Singh Lakra v. Union of India and Ors.
The High Court held that the Revisional Authority cannot enhance a penalty after the Tribunal has set aside the compulsory retirement order and directed a decision on the pending revision petition, quashing the Tribunal's order that failed to address this issue.
Ramesh Chander Pandey v. Employees Provident Fund Organization
The Delhi High Court directed the EPFO to release the petitioner's provident fund dues upon receipt of a duly attested claim form by the bank, rejecting the respondent's refusal based on employer attestation or procedural grounds.
Gautam Mehta v. Bikram Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Controlling Authority's order under the Payment of Gratuity Act, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust the alternative statutory remedy.
Gautam Mehta v. Hardayal Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Controlling Authority's order under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, holding that the petitioner must avail the statutory alternative remedy.
Gautam Mehta v. Jai Kishan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust the alternative statutory remedy provided under the Act.
WANDERLUST TRAVELS PVT LTD v. DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act in a dispute over alleged encroachment and contract performance in an adventure park lease, holding that factual disputes must be resolved by arbitration.
Jaswin Arora v. Harmeet Singh Sood & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified interim injunctions to exclude the front ground floor and basement portions owned by a third party, limiting relief to the rear portions legitimately in dispute.
Narinder Nath Seth & Ors. v. Lata Seth & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to modify a preliminary partition decree based on a conditional family settlement that became null and void due to non-execution of the sale deed within the stipulated time, affirming the finality of the decree.
Vippy Solvex Products Ltd. v. State Trading Corporation Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of damages against State Trading Corporation, holding that under the tripartite contract the plaintiff assumed all shipment obligations and defendant no.1 bore no liability for shipment delays or related claims.
Smt. Huma Qamar and Anr. v. Authorization Committee, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
The Delhi High Court remanded the appeal for re-examination, directing the Appellate Authority to thoroughly assess the genuineness of kidney donation motivated by affection, ensure proper donor evaluation, and pass a reasoned order balancing donor and recipient interests under the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994.