Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Shailesh @ Rinku v. State

11 Apr 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:2346-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder and related charges due to significant gaps and inconsistencies in the prosecution's circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the necessity of a complete and unbroken chain of proof for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence chain of circumstances last seen evidence mobile phone CDR

Pratyush Anand Mishra v. Union of India

11 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2356

The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory one-year experience requirement in a Law Officer recruitment advertisement, holding it to be a valid policy prerogative of the employer and dismissed the petition challenging it.

administrative petition_dismissed mandatory experience qualification employer prerogative recruitment advertisement equal opportunity

Vipin Kumar v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd

11 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2364

The Delhi High Court directed HPCL to reconsider the petitioner's performance appraisal representation and pass a reasoned speaking order, emphasizing the need for clarity in administrative decisions.

administrative other performance appraisal speaking order administrative decision representation rejection

SANDISK LLC v. ISHU NARANG

11 Apr 2018 · Manmohan J · 2018:DHC:2355

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of SanDisk LLC against Ishu Narang for trademark infringement, awarding permanent injunction, damages, and delivery up of seized counterfeit goods.

civil appeal_dismissed summary judgment trademark infringement passing off copyright infringement

Sunder Singh Talwar v. Kamal Chand Dugar

11 Apr 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:2352

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on bona fide requirement grounds for the landlord's dependent daughter and daughter-in-law, affirming that a married daughter can be a dependent family member under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement eviction

Binoy Kumar Jha v. Rama Arjun Retail Pvt. Ltd.

11 Apr 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:2354

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's refusal to grant leave to defend a summary suit due to the defendant's frivolous and unsubstantiated defence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant leave to defend Order XXXVII CPC summary suit dishonoured cheque

R. K. Aggarwal & Anr. v. State of Delhi & Ors.

11 Apr 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:2353

The Delhi High Court allowed probate of a registered Will despite technical deficiencies in attestation evidence, applying a holistic approach to prove due execution under the Indian Succession Act.

property petition_allowed Significant probate petition valid Will attesting witnesses Indian Succession Act 1925

WIMPY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED & ANR v. KALVINDER SINGH SANDHU & ORS

11 Apr 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:2366-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the rejection of a review application in execution proceedings, holding that executing courts may conduct forensic inquiries despite prior foreign adjudication and that such orders are not appealable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Execution proceedings Section 151 CPC Review and recall Forensic examination

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SATVEERI & ORS

11 Apr 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:2365

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to reduce compensation by deducting income tax and adjusting non-pecuniary damages, while upholding the personal expenses deduction in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation income tax deduction personal expenses deduction

RATIONAL INTELLECTUAL HOLDINGS LTD. v. MR. SUNNY KARIRA

11 Apr 2018 · Vibhu Bahru · 2018:DHC:2350

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award rejecting a domain name dispute complaint for violation of natural justice, holding that the Arbitral Tribunal erred in relying on suo moto research without giving the petitioner an opportunity to respond.

other appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 18 Domain Name Dispute

Sangeeta Kumari & Anr. v. Shittal Parsad Nekie

11 Apr 2018 · S.P. Garg · 2018:DHC:2349

The Delhi High Court held that non-compliance with a restitution of conjugal rights decree cannot bar a wife's claim for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and directed maintenance to be paid to her.

family appeal_allowed Significant Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance restitution of conjugal rights Section 9 Hindu Marriage Act

Monsanto Technology LLC v. Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd.

11 Apr 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:2348-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed Monsanto's appeal and partly allowed Nuziveedu Seeds' appeal and counterclaim in a seed technology intellectual property dispute, affirming protection of proprietary rights.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant intellectual property seed technology infringement commercial appeal

Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. and Ors. v. Monsanto Technology LLC and Ors.

11 Apr 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:2347-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the patentability of Monsanto's Bt cotton genetic invention under the Patents Act, rejected challenges based on Section 3(j), and directed payment of trait fees by Nuziveedu consistent with local laws, balancing patent rights with plant variety protections.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Bt cotton patentability Section 3(j) Patents Act nucleic acid sequence

Snehlata v. Priti Tandon & Anr.

11 Apr 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:2351

The Delhi High Court rejected a counter claim for partition and declarations over property held benami, holding it barred under the Benami Act, limitation, and improper court fees valuation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 Section 4(1) Benami Act Order VII Rule 11 CPC Limitation Act, 1963 Article 58

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S Prakash Atlanta (JV)

11 Apr 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:2343-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed NHAI's appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that extension of time bars liquidated damages claims and that the award based on accepted industry norms was not liable to interference.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Extension of Time

Manoj & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi

11 Apr 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:2345-DB

The High Court modified Manjeet Singh's conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder and acquitted other accused due to failure to prove common object and participation in the unlawful assembly beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly common object culpable homicide not amounting to murder interested witnesses

Dhannu Dabi v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

11 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2357

The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to consider and decide the petitioner's representation regarding school management and vacant posts within a stipulated time, emphasizing the need for timely administrative action and speaking orders.

administrative other mandamus representation speaking order administrative action

Hari Singh Dulgas v. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

11 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2358

The Delhi High Court held that only serving employees can act as Defence Assistants in departmental inquiries under CDA Rules, but if none are willing, the petitioner must apply to the Inquiry Officer who must pass a reasoned order before proceeding.

administrative other departmental inquiry Defence Assistant Conduct Discipline and Appeal Rules serving employee

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Petroleum Workers Union

11 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2359

The Delhi High Court upheld Industrial Tribunal Awards directing Indian Oil Corporation to regularize contract workmen engaged over decades through successive contractors, holding such contracts to be sham under the contract labour prohibition notification.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant contract labour prohibition regularization of workmen sham contract perennial employment

Heera Lal v. DAV Public School & Ors.

11 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2360

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent school to treat the petitioner's legal notice as a representation and pass a reasoned order within a stipulated time, thereby ensuring the petitioner's right to be heard.

civil other suspension order legal notice representation speaking order