Heera Lal v. DAV Public School & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 11 Apr 2018 · 2018:DHC:2360
Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 3516/2018
2018:DHC:2360
civil other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent school to treat the petitioner's legal notice as a representation and pass a reasoned order within a stipulated time, thereby ensuring the petitioner's right to be heard.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 3516/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: April 11, 2018
W.P.(C) 3516/2018 & C.M. 13863/2018
HEERA LAL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate
VERSUS
DAV PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Ruchika Gupta & Mr. Bhaskar Chhakara, Advocates for respondents No.3 & 4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
(ORAL)
ORDER

1. Quashing of Suspension Order of 12th November, 2014 with consequential relief is sought by petitioner, who claims to have made various Representations followed by a Legal Notice of 26th December, 2017 (Annexure-L) to respondents.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is no response to the legal notice (Annexure –L).

3. Despite service of advance notice, none has appeared on behalf of respondent-School.

4. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition and application with direction to respondent- School to consider Legal Notice of 26th December, 2017 (Annexure-L) as a Representation and to pass a speaking order thereon within a period of 2018:DHC:2360 W.P.(C) 3516/2018 four weeks and its fate be made known to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.

5. With aforesaid directions, this petition and application are disposed of. Dasti.

JUDGE APRIL 11, 2018 r